People have the right to say what they want. If they are not being violent or violating anyone's' rights, they should be able to. There would also be abuse over what defines "hate" speech and politicians would use it as an excuse to censor opposing viewpoints. Insults would be considered "hate" speech. A ban would not be practical, would be abused, and violate freedom.
People have the right to say whatever they want. I am ethnically Jewish, but I would support the right of neo-nazi's to march and protest, just as I support the right of the westboro baptist church to protest, even if I was homosexual. If people get stirred up by hate speech and commit violent acts, that is their fault and they are solely held responsible for that.
It is unpopular speech that needs the most protection.
Even if you hate somebody's opinion, even if it's stupid, they should have the right to express it. It is only fair. By banning hate speech, you are encouraging the government to make further restrictions to hate speech, perhaps banning speech against the government etc. Hate speech is part of free speech, and should be legal.
Whats next? Pff. Wuss liberals, Are people who dont/do believe in god now hate speech? Just because the opinions unpopular. Its their right, get over it crybabies. People can call me anything they want, kids nowadays just need to grow a pair. "an unpopular view is still a view". -my brain
Banning hate speech actually will probably swell the problem. Look at Europe, even with their laws banning hate speech, there is still more overt intolerance in the continent. At the same time, I don't think it should be encouraged. Hate speech should be allowed but should be strongly stigmatized and discouraged.
People need to learn to accept whatever language people use. Also, in the modern world people get offended way to easily. No one should ever get in trouble for making a politically incorrect joke. The problem is that the liberals teach people to be sensitive to everything and get offended by anything.
You may have actually never read it, but you use it to defend almost everything... The 1st Amendment. The most quoted, but least read, statement in the world.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
It does not say you have to right to never be offended. It says the Government can not make laws prohibiting free speech.
It already is, as long as it doesn't provoke violent reactions. That's why the American Nazi Party is a thing. They marched through a Jewish community with signs. And it was deemed totally legal. But protest IS part of their first amendment rights as long as it's peaceful. We cannot take away their rights unless we make an amendment to the first one.
People cannot say whatever they want. If a jewish person is walking down the block and a someone yells an obscenity out at him, it hurts. If a gay person is taunted at work or at school, it hurts. Yes, people have the right to protest against laws and other various social issues, but it is wrong to protest against the existence of jews or gays. No person should be forced to endure the fact that there is a whole protest against his being.
Yes, if victims of hate speech react violently to a protest their it is wrong and they should be held responsible, but think about how they feel. Imagine being told that your race/religion/family is evil or a disease or just doesn't have the right to exist; its a slap in the face. Hopefully you wouldn't have a violent reaction but many people don't have that self-control. At least understand why a victim of hate speech might get violent.
Until you actually are standing in the victims shoes don't say "I wouldn't mind." Many people end up harming or even killing themselves because they had enough of taunts and insults from other people. Words Hurt.
Hate speech is a form of violence, and is as damaging to people (in a different way) as physical assault, which is of course illegal. Hate speech in public violates a personal right that is more important than the right to say what you want in public: namely, the right to go out in public without fear of violence or discriminatory behavior. Hate speech is not just any speech that *could* offend people, it is speech that is known to be offensive and harmful to people of a certain race, sexual orientation or gender. That said, I agree with several of the people who voted YES that the definition of hate speech needs to be clear to avoid the slippery slope.
If hate speeches are legalized then where does it end and why are people filled with so much hate. I do think people should be able to express distaste for something but within reason. I also dont think people are civilized enough for that kind of expression with all the abuse, bullying, and cruelty we have already.