Amazon.com Widgets

Should Hillary Clinton be more honest about her Wall Street campaign donors?

  • Let's Get Honest

    Hillary Clinton should be more honest about her Wall Street campaign donors because she lacks transparency. The American people do not trust Mrs. Clinton and she needs to let the public know who her major contributors are. Her reputation has never been worse. During her time as first lady it was actually better.

  • I know politics is synonymous with lying but that doesn't make it right

    Honesty, is key. People don't like being lied to, especially if their future (potentially) lies in your hands. Your dishonesty will be remembered and referenced, people are not so easy to forget these things. If you can't be honest about things, like say, people who are donating to you, others will be very suspicious about why you didn't make that bit of information public and that can hurt you in the long run. If you're honest about your donors, at the very least, nobody can say you were trying to hide who your donors were and how much they're giving you, attempting to do so only makes you look bad and not all publicity is good publicity.

  • I think campaigns should be transparent.

    I think transparency is important in a campaign, and Hillary Clinton should be more honest about her Wall Street campaign donors. It is important to know what promises she has already made them if she becomes president. I would expect all presidential campaigns to be as transparent as possible, so voters can make the most educated decision.

  • Hillary Clinton has been honest about Wall Street donors.

    Hillary Clinton has been honest about Wall Street donors. Just because Mrs. Clinton has Wall Street donors as a part of the super pac does not subject those donors or Mrs. Clinton to any extra review over and above what other candidates are subjected. Mrs. Clinton has provided all the information required by law.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.