It is true that Isa Gambar was not the actual head of state on the Brussels trip, but why restrict international travel to just the leaders in actual power? They don't speak for all of the country. Given that the whole world is connected through the Internet now, it is impossible to pretend that only the actual head of state has a voice for his country. Isa Gambar has influence too, so it makes sense to let him travel internationally too.
No, Isa Gambar should not have been sent to Brussels, because that was a move that was intended to make a political statement. He is not the head of state and currently thinks that he should be the head of state, but for now he is not. He should have tried to work in his country and not move to Brussels, but he did.
No, Isa Gambar should not have been sent to Brussels, because that was a move that was intended to make a political statement. Gambar is not the head of state. He thinks that he should be the head of state, but for now he is not. He should have worked for change in his own country and not made the trip.
Isa Gambar should not have been sent to Brussels.At this point he had little or no say in the government.In this type of situation a person like Gambar does nothing but add fire to a volatile situation.It would have been better if he had just let other people handle the situation.
Isa Gambar had no business going to Brussels on a recent trip by Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev. The trip was for the head of state, which is Aliyev. Gambar has no place or say in the current government at this point. Aliyev went there to talk to NATO leaders regarding Baku's role in Afghanistan.