A man should be able to have time with his kid. What is wrong with the people who say that he shouldn't? It is as much his child as it is the mother's. While a paternity leave shouldn't be as long as a maternity leave, there should be one. A man wants to spend time with his new baby boy or girl and the child should get a chance to learn who her father is.
They should have time to help their wife to get better and take care of the baby. It's hard for one women who has gone threw labor to take care of a child by herself. A man should be available to let the woman have time off from taking care of a child.
After birth the mother needs someone to tend to her. In most cases the woman has family, but that is not true in every event. The woman needs to have the emotional and physical support of their spouse. Post-partum depression can be very stressful for a mother, therefore need someone to tend to the newborn's needs when she cannot.
Men should be able to get paternity leave, not because of the "bonding time" with the child but because of many other reasons. When i had my big baby, i couldn't sit down comfortably for 3 months because of how bad i was stretched. Also, many mothers get very stressed out with their first born, and even worse if they have multiple children at once. Whether the woman can physically do it is not the point here, the point is the significant other helping out so the mother could have rest.
Men have the responsibility to take care of their children just as much as women do. Just because they aren't the ones carrying the child or giving birth it does not mean that they should have less of a hand in raising it. Paternity leave is necessary. Fathers need to be with their children, too.
This shouldn't be about traditional roles, recovery of the woman's body, or bonding. The intention of a maternity leave (or paternity leave, for that matter) is that the parent will be able to care for the baby's physical needs. Many women/men work at a place where maternity/paternity leave is not available; if this is the case, their spouse, regardless of gender, should be able to take leave. If childcare leave is available to both parents, they should divide it between the two of them.
Why is it that men are still seen as the breadwinners and women as caretakers? No woman wants to raise her kid alone, and no woman should be faced with this. Also, forget about the parents. What about that little person that just got to this world? He/she needs a father figure just as much as a mother.
Dads should have the right to be there for their wives or girlfriends when they are expecting. Of course, men don't need as long of a paternity leave as women, but the guy who got that girl pregnant should be there to help her and take care of her at least a couple of weeks before and after the baby is expected.
Some employers discriminate against young women as they are worried they'll have a baby. Now men are equally risky, so the employers will have to come up with ways to cover people when they leave instead of discriminating against women. I undertand it can be difficult for small businesses to cover paternal leave, but that's not an excuse for gender discrimination. As far as I'm aware this kind of system works in other places in Europe, so why not give it a chance here? In a lot of situations it might even be good for the employer as the woman/man who takes leave won't take a full year, they'll split the time with their partner.
You shouldn't be able to answer this question until you have had a child and went though the process of bringing a baby home. I have had a baby who means the world to me but I went though hours and hours of labor too and ended up with a C-section. Yes the women deserve time off but anyone that woke up night after night or like me slept in a kitchen chair with your feet propped in another because your staples pulled so bad you could not get out of bed on your on. My husband helped as much as he could however the two days he had off we were in the hospital and when we came home he went back to work which left me taking care of my precious baby all day and night and yes I loved it, however it would have been a big help with my husband there. Some say dads don't deserve time off because they didn't just have the baby but how does the mom have anytime off when taking care of a newborn is a full time job recovering from having a baby requires sleep lack of sleep can lead to depression and postpartum depression is not something to take lightly. Plus just because dads don't physically have the baby they do mentally and need time to bond with there child too.
Men do nothing to deserve paternity leave. It is the woman who carry around the baby inside her for 9 months. They are the ones to have to be careful with what they eat, or what they do. The women are the ones gaining weight, and putting more pressure on their back when they fetus starts to grow bigger inside them. Men are to provide for the family. Meaning while the girl is resting, regaining her stability, and caring for the child the man should be bringing home money for her and their child.
What does his vagina need to recover from? And what kind of a woman is so dependent on her husband/boyfriend that she needs him taking care of her after doing something as natural as giving birth. A hundred years ago women used to plow the fields, squat, have a baby then go do the wash by hand. When did we get so soft? And what job is it that the father is at for so many hours that he cant come home and cook dinner/clean/feed new baby all in the same day? He doesn't need time off he needs to work harder at home when he finishes his work day.
No, because the father's body did absolutely nothing to make the baby. The father's body doesn't need to recuperate at home nor does the father have his hormones out of whack. If men get paternity leave just to "bond" with the baby then women should get 2 maternity leaves one to recover from giving birth and pregnancy and the other maternity leave to "bond" with the baby.
Leave off from work should be dedicated only to the mother. This time off allows her to mentally and physically heal after giving birth. Additionally, the mother can nurse the baby and acquire the sleep that is needed to bounce back.
The father of the baby should continue to work and support his family. Taking time off, especially without pay, would cause a financial burden.
If the father believes that he won't get the same "bonding" time with the baby, come home at a decent time, spend time with your family in the evenings, and on the weekends.
As a society, we have become to believe we are entitled equal rights, yet I don't see the father giving birth to children, or women making the same wages as men. This is not an equal rights time, it's a time of what is best for the child. Having the father home at this time doesn't help the mother out.
The only time I could see Paternity Leave being an option was if there were complications in the birth and the mother was unable to take care of the baby herself.
Men should stay at work.....My Father wasn't home with me to bond, why should Fathers get it now?? I'm just as close to my Father even if he wasn't home during the day.
This Politically correct world is making me sick. I'm a woman and didn't have any kids, I don't even think women should get a year off. I think if you want kids that badly, and like I hear so many Mothers say how much they love their kids, then stay home full time with them. People say they can't afford it. They can't afford it only because they want all the material things in life, which is not always the most important thing.
you have to relize yes the women did it all but relize your husbands gonna be home and doing everything cleaning cooking do it all while you relax sleep do what you need to do so idk why you are saying no if theres a positive side to you women and a good husband would help around the house while you rest
Not to get into too hypothetical of an argument, but if companies were forced to give paternity leave to men and women, for months at a time, it would seriously injure the economy and all businesses. This opportunity cost is greater than the necessity for men to be at home with the mother taking care of the baby; on a equal rights standpoint, women are more than able to take care of the baby and themselves. Men can always see and interact with their children after work and on the weekends, there is simply no need to pay two people for months at a time so that they can raise their children.. If a couple wanted some time off with their new child then they should have saved. Its not the burden of the business to fund both of them.
I feel like the way that society is today that some fathers are not able to take off work, just because many jobs don't offer it. But if they have a good job which they have to have for this to be even considered, then yes. They probably were not home much when the child was conceived.
Neither parent should be entitled to paid leave just for having a child. The world is GROSSLY over-populated! If YOU chose to have a child, why should your employer have to pay for it. Just to be civil, understanding, and just, both parents should be able take unpaid leave at their option for a reasonable amount of time (say 12 wks). If you're too poor to take a few months off unpaid, you probably aren't in the appropriate financial situation to even have a child. Simply put - having a child is a very selfish thing to do. If YOU chose to, that's your problem - not your employers or mine or anyone else's.
Men should not be offered paternity leave because legally, granting or declining paternity leave is classified as discrimination. If men should be granted any kind of leave is should be parental leave. BUT the request for parental leave should not be granted because the male in the household should stay at work and still help support the finances. A man's stress during the pregnancy is the woman and once the woman conceives the child, his recuperation has already started. It is illegal and also very lazy for the male to do this.