Amazon.com Widgets
  • F f f

    F f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f y f f f f f f f f f

  • F f f

    F f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f y f f f f f f f f f

  • F f f

    F f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f y f f f f f f f f f

  • F f f

    F f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f y f f f f f f f f f

  • F f f

    F f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f y f f f f f f f f f

  • F f f

    F f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f y f f f f f f f f f

  • F f f

    F f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f y f f f f f f f f f

  • F f f

    F f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f y f f f f f f f f f

  • Countries should prohibit the production of nuclear power.

    Every nuclear power reactor makes massive amounts of radioactive waste, which can cause cancer. People who worked as part of the clean up crew after the Chernobyl accident in April of 1986 had an increased risk of getting leukemia. Also, out of the 6.5 million people that lived in the contaminated areas around Chernobyl, children and adolescents exposed to radiation had an increased risk of developing thyroid cancer.

  • Please stop using this terrible thing

    These things can cause mass destruction and cause global health problems! We can use wint turbines or Water generators powered by the flow of water down a stream or lake, etc. I think this also pollutes lots of things too like water perhaps. Anyway a we should just stop using nuclear power plants!

  • No, We Are Not Ready For That

    Maybe in time we can completely convert to using things like solar, hydroelectric, wind, geothermal, even hydrogen but that's not now. Nuclear power can be safe if it is used very carefully. Safety standards should vigorously monitored and enforced. The potential risks in terms of hurricanes and earthquakes and other potential disasters should also be considered and the plant secured firmly against a meltdown even in the worst case scenario.
    For now we should be making new nuclear power plants not dismantling the ones we already have. What anti-nuclear activists never consider is that when a nuclear plant isn't built typically they will build a coal plant. A nuclear plant is clean as long as there is never a meltdown. A coal plant is dirty no matter what and can lead to people getting diseases from its pollutants. It's simply unacceptable to expose innocent people to pollutants against their will. Coal should be banned, not nuclear.

  • Any power is harmful

    The amount of power that is used by humans is unatural. There is not a single method to make power that does not effect the enviornment. Nuclear power is the steadiest source of power that exist at this point. Until a method of creating power matches nuclear power that does not effect the enviornment as much, nuclear is our best bet

  • Nuclear power is an important part of the national electrical grid.

    It is not technically feasible to replace the electricity that nuclear power supplies with another source at this time. Solar power is expensive and is a very small percentage of the national power supply of electricity. Wind power shows more promise but cannot generate electricity on calm days. You need a steady supply of power, and nuclear power fills that demand right now.

    Posted by: ddeathnote
  • It's good though

    Bcd it's bad j j m mm m m m m m m m m m m m m m m mm m m m m m m m m mm m mm m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m

  • Nuclear Power is Cleanest

    From what I've seen, nuclear power is our best bet for a power source. While it's dangerous, it is the most efficient. Over time we should stop using it, but only when other clean energy sources are sufficient for our planet's needs. Until then, let's use this tool we've got.

  • Aren't they all unsafe

    Fossil fuel is hard to get out and that is our main source of energy and its dangerous to get it. When we get we are hurting the environment why isn't anyone questioning them but no this one is way more danger and yes you might say we are using fossil fuel cause we have no alternative what happens when we run out of fossil fuel the what?? Instead of dismissing it lets try to figure out a way to make it safe and less hazardous to the world.

  • Any other alternatives?

    Unless you're going to try to argue with me on this with solar and wind energy as our savior for energy, you better think twice about dropping the use of nuclear energy. It's not as dangerous as some people advocate about it. I'm all for it, unless we can come up with more alternatives besides solar and wind energy.

  • We do need it

    Its 20 percent of the usa power its the safest energy in world hey man sup sj s sjs j jdwhn d che cn c ejhech c c chehceh v v v vv vv v vv v vv v v v v v v v v v v v vv

  • They can kill life and animals including people and we need animals and people to

    We need to stop power plats because , they can lead to disater and death and people and also poulit the airand people should not alow them because they can also kill what everybody loves mother nature and it life souce it the best thing that cna happen to the owrld

  • Risks versus Rewards; Nuclear Power Benefits

    The key argument for stopping nuclear power is because people have seen and heard about the disasters at Three-Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima. Many are afraid of nuclear meltdowns and the risks that come with nuclear power. There have only been around 12,000 people who have died of nuclear disasters. Around 33,000 people died of car accidents ALONE in 2012. So why have we not stopped driving cars? Not only so, but 4,000 people die of coal-generated power for every one person of nuclear power.
    Three-Mile Island nuclear meltdown was successfully contained because the safety measures were followed. Chernobyl happened because the crew did not follow the safety measure. Fukushima meltdown was due to the earthquake and the tsunami. The plan at Fukushima was designed to withstand earthquakes and tsunamis, but to have both hit at the same time was not what the plant was designed to hold against. Any other source of energy production wouldn't have been able to withstand those natural disasters either. In the U.S., the government has already spent money on hallowing out Yucca Mountain, which provides a safe storage for the nuclear waste.
    Nuclear power is needed as a main energy source. But just because we have nuclear energy doesn't mean we should stop other alternative sources of energy. We need every type of clean and renewable energy we can get to progress in this world.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.