Amazon.com Widgets

Should Obama be impeached for the Boston bombings?

  • info wars. com

    The government has been covering every evidence there is. The brothers were part of the drill. They were easily blamed because of where they are from. There is a peace of the book bag found and not part of the brothers. It was the same as the police already there. There was a drill two hours before. Also one of the brothers visited the white house in 2009.

  • Obama should not be impeached for the Boston bombings.

    Obama did not tell this "men" to go to Boston and set bombs to kill people. To even think of impeaching him is crazy. He is responsible for bringing Bin Laden to justice. He was responsible to capturing Hussein. He has nothing to do with the bombing except that he is not lying down and taking it.

  • This makes no sense.

    This is an absurd question that is based on a conspiracy theory with little to no backing behind it. Of course, if Obama was in some way responsible for the bombings, it would be right to impeach him. But we have no reason to believe that he is in any way responsible.

  • Enough conspiracy theories.

    I think what he questioner was trying to ask was, ‘should Obama be investigated for Terrorism’.

    It’s also preposterous notion that President Obama would have anything to do with a terrorist attack that killed American citizens. There is no legal case against the President, nor is there any evidence to build such a case.

  • No reason to!

    POTUS will be remembered for killing Ben Laden, enacting health care, and functioning civilly in spite of Republican envy and foolishness. Republicans want him out for being reelected,smarter than they are and black. He is to be commended for his plan to let Latinos born here stay--as other immigrants have done, some of them being their parents probably. While this is a great country to be in, the continuing presence of racism is accented by Trump, Rove, McConnell, Ryan, Riebus, Graham & son, MCain, Palin, Bachman and the list goes on. Still the man perseveres and in so doing, proves that he is the right man for the job. People like these participated in killing Jesus--and he rose. So will Obama be remembered well in history.

  • No, but yet he failed to protect our citizens.

    What the hell is this question to be asked by some dumb pitiful human? Even though I am as well, but we all humans are becoming blind or stupid, perhaps both. We are supposed to be smart to know that. We are angered at his failures and we are angered at the Tsarnaev family. Gdub Bush failed to protect our citizens at all times, so do every previous presidents before the two. The commander-in-chief does not care about the citizens, but care about greed, selfishness and the family of his/her own. I do care about my family too while I want to have other people to grow spines instead of being cowards to keep our mouths shut and do what we're told by the congress. We need a government indeed, but we neither want corruption nor wanting too much politics. We shall deter with courage, not whine and moan with protesting. I suppose people may agree with me, but those who oppose don't simply get that humanity does fail at all times. There are no winners, we tie at everything. We are on our own to stop what we're doing and think first before we gone into paranoia. Semper fidelis.

  • Obama should not be impeached for the Boston bombings.

    Obama did not tell this "men" to go to Boston and set bombs to kill people. To even think of impeaching him is crazy. He is responsible for bringing Bin Laden to justice. He was responsible to capturing Hussein. He has nothing to do with the bombing except that he is not lying down and taking it.

  • This makes no sense.

    This is an absurd question that is based on a conspiracy theory with little to no backing behind it. Of course, if Obama was in some way responsible for the bombings, it would be right to impeach him. But we have no reason to believe that he is in any way responsible.

  • not at all!

    I do not like obama and i do not like his policies. But if he had nothing to do with the bombings, then why should he get punished for it? That would be like sending me to jail because some stranger shot somebody else. If obama had something to do with it then, yes, he should be impeached, but as far as we know obama had nothing to do with the bombings so he should not be punished for the mindless actions of somebody else.

  • NO! This is unthinkable!

    Is it Obama's fault that Djohar Tsarnaev is a criminally insane psychopath?No! Death for Tsarnaev, political career for Obama! How can Obama be blamed for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev exploding? Tsarnaev is criminally insane, needs help, and is a complete jackass. Obama is making all the right decisions. Go Obama! It is unthinkable that someone would blame Obama for this!

  • Of course not.

    What a stupid question. Should FDR have been impeached for Pearl Harbor? Should George W. be impeached for 9/11? Whatever your answer to these questions, it doesn't matter. They weren't, so there is no precedent for it. What a terrible system of government we would live in if this became an actual question.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
MassiveDump says2013-04-27T15:27:15.597
Who even made this question?
Anonymous says2013-05-27T22:43:16.957
I know. It's just Baraka Obama failed to protect the citizens while he's in the bubble full of his bodyguards. Yes, he did announce that Osama Bin Laden is dead, but he did not kill him. The members of the DEVGRU did kill Osama. I guess our citizens are both blind and stupid. This is the reason why humanity has fallen. We all live in this mess and there's nothing we can do, but to get the politicians out of office, so we can control the country our way in an unbiased bull session.