Adfvk df asdfjhsdfj sdf sdf asdf sdf sad fsd sd s sd sd fsds ds f sdf sdfsdf sdf sf sd sd sd sd sd fsd fsd sdf sdf sdf sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd s dd d d d d d d d
The Use Of Drugs In Sports Is Not Unfair; It Promotes Equality.
In terms of sports, the perception that everyone has the same chance at winning is totally ridiculous. The playing field in’t level, it has never been. Athletes in developed communities have a greater advantage over athletes in less developed communities because they have more funding, sports institutions, and easy access to health care. Is that fair?
And let’s not forget that there are some people who are born with genetic advantages. Take for instance Euro Mantra, a Finish skier and a multiple Olympic champion. In 1960-1972 Winter Olympics, Mantra won seven medals in total, making him one of the best in the field of skiing. But later, scientists found he had a gene mutation – that he naturally had more red blood cells than others, which measured at up to 65 percent above the average. Imagine that? Mantra’s niece and nephew, Elli and Perot, have also found to have gene mutation, which gave them an advantage to win in relays at Olympics.
The ability to perform well in competition is connected with the ability of the body to deliver oxygen to muscles. As we know, oxygen is carried by red bloods cells. Therefore, the more red blood cells the body has, the more oxygen is delivered to muscles. This in turn, improves an athlete’s performance.
Well, there are various legal ways in order to improve your red blood cell count, such as undergoing blood transfusion and surgery, exercising, eating iron-rich food, and taking vitamins and iron-rich supplements. But all these sometimes produce low results and sometimes don’t work well, so athletes turn to other options, such as doping, to increase their red blood cell production easily. But as well all know, doping is illegal. Lawmakers and sports organizers make doping illegal because they think it makes the playing field uneven. But some athletes have high red blood cells by luck. Some competitors can afford to buy training equipment. Is that fair? Of course, it is not. Therefore, it is nonsensical to say that using drugs in sports is unfair. By allowing athletes to take pads, we’re giving all athletes an equal playing field.
They should be legal because it would make the game a whole lot better. It would be fun to watch because there would be more home runs and that might make people come to the games more and increase income. Also it would be more far to the people that don't have as much power or are not as good as others.
Performance enhancing drugs are banned as they increase the athlete’s playing ability, which is not accurate. However, athletes are allowed to consume bananas and isotonic drinks, which also serve to increase their playing ability. If that is the case, why aren’t bananas and isotonic drinks classified as performance enhancing drugs and therefore banned?
If performance enhancing drugs were allowed, not only would the playing field be levelled, it would be at a higher level, A huge part of watching sports is witnessing the very peak of human athletic ability, and legalizing performance enhancing drugs would help athletes climb even higher. Steroids and doping will help pitchers to throw harder, home runs to go further, cyclists to charge for longer and sprinters to test the very limits of human speed.
This should be the business of private companies to decide for themselves. That the public doesn't respect steroid use is enough incentive for them to continue to ban performance-enhancing drugs. But if someone wants to create leagues with other rules that should be fine. In fact what would likely happen is different leagues would have various different rules. In that way sports leagues would in addition to entertainment functions perform laboratory functions as over time we'll be able to see the effects that drugs have on athletes. If the problem ever gets too bad then maybe it's time to ban them again or if not that then to impose certain new restrictions but that's how public policy is supposed to work. Instead of just assuming an answer to be right from the outset we should experiment and see what happens and then adjust for what happens.
Kills you and can make you diekills you and can make you diekills you and can make you diekills you and can make you diekills you and can make you diekills you and can make you diekills you and can make you diekills you and can make you diekills you and can make you diekills you and can make you die
Drugs should only be used to cure illness or alleviate pain. Using drugs to gain a competitive advantage would be a form of cheating, and run the risk of damaging the bodies of the athletes. Sport should be an activity for fun, but not at the expense of someone's health.
For many male high school athletes, pro athletes are major influences. They are the role models. They choose the jersey numbers of their favorite professional players. They emulate their training regimens. They emulate their style of play. And they are influenced by their drug use. When a professional athlete admits to using steroids, the message young athletes hear is not always the one that is intended. Young athletes often believe that steroid use by their role models gives them permission to use. That it is simply part of what one must do to become an elite athlete.
I think we are most impressed watching sports when exceptionally talented people emerge. They seem to have been gifted physically and or mentally to a level beyond what has been seen previously, which makes them stand out from everyone else.
It's incredible for us to see and we marvel in the atheletes talent and skill.
If PEDs were allowed there would be hundreds of people smashing records every week. Ordinary atheletes would be acheiving things way beyond their natural abilities rendering new highs as fake as the chemicals used to reach them.
These drugs are used to make you better but it hurts your body all your doing is cheating your self if you want to get better do it by practicing harder and pushing your self to be the player you want to be without performance enhancing drugs.No matter the problem you should never use performance enhancing drugs.
I do not think that performance enhancing drugs should be allowed. They are not natural. They make game play unfair. Also they are not good for people so this kind of drug use should not be encouraged or permitted. I think that things are much better when people work hard themselves to be good at something.
PED's are cheating. They do not create fair competition. Healthy competition should be just that, since PED"s can have severe side effects. Athletes should be able to rely on their skill and training when they compete and not on PED's. They should be able to compete against others who are held to the same standards.
Performance enhancing drugs should stay out of sports. I want to see natural people compete in these sports and maintain what integrity they can. Not to mention the fact that performance enhancing drugs being legal would cause a biological arms race in the game which would hurt players of the sports.
Performance enhancing drugs shouldn't be allowed in professional sports today. Virtually all sports have banned them, but players continue to try and cheat the system. These drugs aren't safe for athletes and make a given sport less genuine. Without a doubt, players should rely upon their own skills and talents - nothing else.
No, I do not believe performance enhancing drugs should be allowed. It is not fair to those that are naturally talented or work hard to remain in shape for another to come in and take the spotlight because they have decided to take the easy route. It is also not fair to those that have great talent, but choose not to partake in the drugs. Hard work is becoming an endangered species in this country.