Amazon.com Widgets
  • It's time to break the gender stereotype.

    It teaches kids the difference between the male and female reproductive system in a way that's shame-free and clear. When people think of "porn", they are only viewing it in a very one-sided way as the male and female genitalia is still a very taboo topic in any society. Furthermore, words don't describe everything - how does one know whether the teacher is saying the truth without seeing it in action?

  • Educational uses only

    Porn would be a good tool for health class because is teaches kids how to have sex correctly. And also who cares anyway all schools are required to show a birth video any way so why not teach kids how babies are made if for some dumb reason they don't

  • Yes Yes Yes

    What better way to lean about the human body.What better way to lean about the human body.What better way to lean about the human body.What better way to lean about the human body.What better way to lean about the human body.What better way to lean about the human body.What better way to lean about the human body.

  • Are you insane, porn in a classroom

    This would be absolutely inappropriate, sex is already a joke for kids what kind of damage would this do? Kids would grow expectations. Though I do agree sex education needs to be upgraded, this is no way to do it. The schools need to show kids the basics but not porn.

  • Never should it ever

    Pornography is bad, hands down. Unless, of course, you think looking at pictures of people with little or no clothing on is good. Using that kind of pictures to teach children would not be good. Besides that, it is the parents responsibility to teach their children about sex, not the school's.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.