Amazon.com Widgets
  • No responses have been submitted.
  • It should be a personal decision, as long as the actors undergo STD testing.

    I think people who watch porn probably don't want to see condoms worn as part of the sex act and it would probably hurt their business. The porn stars themselves that want to wear protection should be able to, but they should not have it forced on them. However, for them to protect themselves they should undergo STD testing and potentially use other forms of birth control.

  • Mandatory Protection in the Adult Entertainment Industry

    We here in America tout the ideology that a person should do whatever feels good to them at any given time and that consenting adults should decide amongst themselves what is best for their own well-being. This same concept should be applied to the Adult Entertainment Industry. In my opinion, if you desire to be in that place and do that kind of work, you should be willing to deal with the possible consequences. It's up to the individual to try your best to protect yourself. If there is concern of STDs in that situation,as there should be, there are many available jobs that don't put a person in that kind of danger to their health and well-being.

  • No, porn stars should not be required to wear condoms.

    No, porn stars should not be required to wear condoms. Porn stars are tested for STDS, and if there is no STD risk, there should be no reason to have to wear a condom. Viewers would rather see bare sex, and that is the bottom line. Requiring condoms would also be an infringement on the industry.

  • No, this should be a choice

    Pornography is a highly lucrative industry, and it is this way because of different factors. The companies that own pornography businesses must decide whether or not it should be required to wear condoms. This should not be regulated, because this is part of the business sector and porn coompanies may lose business.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.