Should reforestation be a central component of strategies to combat global warming?
Trees and grasslands are the most efficient of using solar energy to sequester the CO2 among any means without second pollution and energy consumption.
As estimated, all the net increase of trees and grasses in weight would be close to the fossil fuel human consumed. If increasing trees and grassland by 10% globally, we can reverse the accumulation of co2 in air and hold the enough water in continent soils to stop the ocean arising.
Posted by: AnonymousReforestation should be the key component to solve the global warming!
These days, a lot of trees are getting cut off. According to my research, between year of 2000 to 2010, 16 million hectares which is as big as one Costa Rica had a deforestation. And, that is really bad. Also, yellow dusts from China's dessert is covering the sky that you are barely able to see a building over one hundred meters from you. So, I think if we keep planting more and more trees, those trees will be very helpful to our life. Then, absolutely, our quality of life will increase. Another reason is because trees absorb Co2, and give us oxygen. Then, we will be able to breathe in more air which are much cleaner than before.
Posted by: AnonymousYes, simply because...
It is the easiest and simplest way to combat Global warming, due to the tree's CO2 consumption, it is also one that can be done the quickest as we could easily do it now, instead of having to wait years to reduce our CO2 emissions, so we could prevent damage being done, and restore the balance of our emissions vs the trees consumption.
Posted by: AnonymousYes, because reforestation is a great way to reduce the effects of global warming.
Since trees take in carbon, they reduce the amount of carbon in the atmosphere that causes global warming. In addition to this, planting trees provides a cooling effect in an urban environment, because trees absorb less heat than pavement. And, increasing the number of trees in the Amazon rainforest increases the efficiency and synergy of that rainforest.
Posted by: CooperativePrinceYes, reforestation should be a central component of strategies to combat global warming, due to trees' effects on our CO2 levels.
Yes, reforestation should be a central component of strategies to combat global warming, for a couple of reasons. First, deforestation causes global warming because, when a tree is chopped down, it releases CO2. Second, trees soak in CO2, so it is not in the atmosphere. Plus, planting trees provides a cooling effect for urban areas.
Posted by: SecondNoel50Vegetated areas absorb the green-house gas carbon dioxide so reforestation would be a good step in combating global warming.
It would be silly to think that reforestation without curbing our emissions of green-house gases would solve everything but it would certainly be a step in the right direction. Heavily vegetated areas absorb atmospheric carbon dioxide, one of the major greenhouse gases. Emissions will have to be curbed along with this strategy though.
Posted by: 54IInfernoI agree that reforestation should be an central part in combating global warning, the more we do to save our global environment the better our environment will get.
I do agree fully that repairing the natural resources to the key to turning around the global economy. We cannot let our natural resources deplete. We can not recreate natural in a true way and while all of the improvements in technology are very good we need to preserve nature. Reforestation should become a main part in us trying to return our planet back to normal.
Posted by: C0ImEIiteReforestation should be used to combat global warming because man is tearing down forests at an unnatural rate.
It is a natural process for trees to die and others to come up but man is destroying the forests at an unnatural rate and thereby upsetting natural processes and a delicate, earth balance. Trees are very necessary to support our oxygen levels and combat CO2 in the atmosphere. Deforestation changes those levels and endangers us all.
Posted by: Nik0InteriorYes, reforestation should be an actual law, because natural habitats need to be maintained as well.
Reforestation is not only a good tool to use to combat global warming, it should also be used as a tool to maintain natural habitats. Anytime we take anything from the earth, we should feel obligated to put something back. If we were to continue to keep taking from the earth without replanting, we will face serious problems in the future. We must always remember that plant life is one of the best sources for the creation of oxygen.
Posted by: SlipArnalReforestation is a way to combat several problems at once.
By coming together with a plan for reforestation we can address multiple concerns besides carbon monoxide levels. These are Erosion, pollution and global poverty. Erosion is a big problem in many places, one that has gone unnoticed for a long time. Up to three cubic feet of top soil are lost world wide every year. Soil that could be supporting farming or an ecosystem. While most people don't think of plants when they think of pollution control, this is very much the case. Trees take in and store certain toxins, removing them from the soil and keeping them in the dead parts of their structures. Poverty is a bit trickier, but with careful planning can be done. Instead of contracting to the lowest bidder, money can be spent to encourage arboriculture with in the countries most in need of industry.
Posted by: R0II4IcyIt is an easy and simple way to make a difference.
It is the easiest and simplest way to combat Global warming. This is due to the a trees CO2 consumption. This can also be done the quickest and we could easily do it now instead of having to wait years to reduce our CO2 emissions. This would prevent damage being done, and restore the balance of our emissions verse the trees consumption.
Posted by: AnonymousReforestation could help a lot of other issues beyond global warming, as well, and there are no drawbacks.
Reforestation has no drawbacks, which is why it would be such a good choice for combating global warming. It would improve the quality of life of everyone, since trees produce oxygen, and everyone needs that. It would also help combat global warming, since forests are vital to weather patterns all around the world.
Posted by: R04chGrovAs deforestation is a known cause of at least 25% of the global warming problem, stopping it and focusing on reforestation to compensate for the deforestation that already has occurred is vital.
Deforestation has been increasing and now it is estimated to be causing 25% of the increase of man made greenhouse gases or co2. Trees take in co2 and store it. When they are cut down, they release the co2 into the environment. Planting trees would help to recapture some of the co2 that would otherwise just stay in the environment and add to the global warming. Reforestation does help the problem to be a little smaller but it is not a perfect solution to it... It would be better if the trees were not cut down and if there were other things that were done by corporations to reduce global warming in addition to the reforestation...It is a strong component but not a central component to the whole global warming program.
Posted by: SportyHartReforestation should be a central component to combat global warming as it would be an effective solution.
Reforestation should be a central component to combat global warming as it would be an effective solution. It wouldn't solve everything itself, but it would be very helpful. Reforestation would help create oxygen that has been depleted. The loss of trees and the oxygen they provide has had a huge impact on the environment so any attempt to fix it would help.
Posted by: H0bi3InvaderReforestation should be a major part of combating global warming, because deforestation is one of the causes of global warming.
Global warming has many causes. Our excessive use of fossil fuels, our use of aerosol sprays, our overpopulation and, yes, deforestation have all contributed to this problem. Deforestation has taken place primarily so that we can use what was once forest land to grow food crops for our constantly expanding population. Has it not occurred to anyone that, at some point, this fragile little rock we call "Earth" will no longer be able to sustain our masses? Deforestation is occurring in the American plain states. Agri-business likes huge areas of flat land unencumbered by the poplars, ashes, and other native trees that once held the soil in place, and provided eco-systems to the hundreds of living creatures that were native to the area. Deforestation is happening at a terrifying rate in the Amazon, where the cut-and-burn method of farming is slowly eating chunks of the Amazon forests that have taken centuries to develop. We happily chew our way through the steaks produced by the cattle farms that have replaced the forests. Those are the same forests that provide us with the very air we breath. Apparently, we have made our choice. We have chosen mindless consumption over the caring preservation of our world.
Posted by: CI3IikeIt would be a great idea because trees provide oxygen and plants are the base of life.
If we decided to plant more trees after tearing down a lot for homes and buildings, then we could reestablish the foundation for which we need oxygen and clean air. Trees provide us with better air quality and lung function because they rid of particles and provide fresh air to all of mankind
Posted by: waffletimeAny effort to help the earth re-balance itself and remain healthy will help prevent natural disasters.
Reforestation helps give back to nature, which, in turn, helps the earth regain a natural balance. When things fall out of balance too much, bad things happen: natural disasters, atmospheric problems and animal extinction. This would have numerous benefits, not only to prevent bad things from happening, but to allow good things to happen.
Posted by: Iewie2cuteReforestation should be a central component of combating global warming to reduce the CO2 emissions.
If reforestation is the prime objective, the increase in numbers of trees will result in more plant processing of the excess CO2 gases in the atmosphere that are contributing to global warming. As a result, this will create a better balance with oxygen and help to reduce the overall greenhouse effect.
Posted by: SoWinifI believe that a critical component of combating global warming is natural methods, such as reforestation.
All organisms on the Earth have a symbiotic relationship with trees. The reason for this is that trees absorb carbon dioxide and produce oxygen. Studies have shown that planting trees may help offset the increased carbon dioxide emissions. CO2 has been shown to be a contributor to global warming. Trees may provide a mitigating factor for global warming.
Posted by: TerrificAldoReforestation is key to combating global warming, because we need the forests to protect the earth's surface.
The more trees we take down, the less photosynthesis takes place. By recreating the forests that have been mowed down for years for lumber, we can provide ways for decreasing the amount of carbon dioxide that rises into our atmosphere, slowly destroying our ozone, as well as replenish depleting resources. Trees also suck other pollutants out of the air, therefore creating a more healthier environment for us to live in. Most importantly though, the trees help decrease carbon dioxide releases into our atmosphere.
Posted by: LeticiaRReforesting areas that have been deforested is good for the health of the climate and should be done.
Forests are often referred to as the "lungs" of the earth because they clean carbon dioxide gases from the atmosphere and store them in their makeup thereby reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Also, in places where forests used to exist replanting trees that have been killed will increase the health of the ecosystem.
Posted by: Wynn354Yes reforestation should be a central component of strategies to combat global warming as we need to plant back all the trees that we have uprooted
Yes reforestation should be a central component of strategies to combat global warming. Today deforestation is the single biggest cause of global warming and if we quickly replant trees in large numbers we will be able to improve the situation. We need to learn how to how to make compost, plant trees, identify biodegradable garbage, recycling etc and undo the damage we have caused due to deforestation..
Posted by: WittyRud
I don't believe reforestation is necessary to combat global warming.
In order for me to think that we need reforestation to combat global warming, I would have to first believe that global warming existed. I remember years ago when we were supposed to be afraid of a coming ice age. Global warming is a myth created by people that want to use it for political purposes. There are cycles of cooling and warming, and if it's really warming then it's just a cycle and not man that is causing it.
Posted by: GaudyTory37natural rest?
when the earth does a natural rest, it freezes its self. kills off 90 percent of everything and starts fresh. grows new trees, new animals organisms you name it. reforestation its going to do jack all if we dont reinvent how to build a home or building. it isnt going to change out paper usage unless we commercialize hemp. the problem isnt should we do it, its how do we change our economic structure to allow it?
Posted by: nemisis07I believe reforestation should not be a part of combating global warming, as plants that fail in a changed environment will also fail if replanting is attempted.
As actual warming does happen, the micro-climates will change. Species of plants will not be able to occupy those areas which they once inhabited. However, those species, if properly managed, will be able to migrate to micro-climates, which will foster their growth. The management is essential if climate change moves too far and too fast for natural reseeding to take place.
Posted by: P03tPoIdI don't believe reforestation is necessary to combat global warming.
In order for me to think that we need reforestation to combat global warming, I would have to first believe that global warming existed. I remember years ago when we were supposed to be afraid of a coming ice age. Global warming is a myth created by people that want to use it for political purposes. There are cycles of cooling and warming, and if it's really warming then it's just a cycle and not man that is causing it.
Posted by: AnonymousWhile I believe that we should focus on reforestation, I do not agree that global warming is an issue.
Reforestation is important to the environment and the ecosystem on which we rely for our daily lives but I do not believe it will affect global warming. While global warming may be occurring at a minimal amount, I do not believe it is as much of a factor as the media would have us believe. I study meteorology and climatology and what we call global warming is simply a cycle that the earth goes through, has gone through before, and will continue to go though as long as it continues to exist.
Posted by: WeaverEmmi