It is unfair that other organizations have to pay taxes and religious organizations don't. Religion should have nothing to do with the government so they should be taxed just as every other organization is taxed.
If we do not tax religious institutions then we have combined church and state. If the religious institution wishes to donate their money to charity, which it should, then they should be able write off these contributions, just as everyone else is able to do.
Yes, I think that religious institutions should pay taxes. I do not see any reason why they shouldn't. They bring in money just like many other institutions, so I think that they should be required to give back to the government, as well. I think that these potential taxes could help the country a great deal.
Do you realize how many churches there are in the U.S but more specifically do you see how nice these churches are compared with the surrounding buildings. If we put a tax on churches and other religious institutions, the U.S government will have ahuge influx of money into its economy, which they could be spent on things like infrastructure, education and science.
Members of religious organizations have the same right to vote for a representative who shares their common ideology as all other voters. Religious leaders have spoken out at political rallies and have made political officials aware of their stance on certain topics. With that right to be represented, comes the responsibility of paying taxes. The Constitutional requirement for the separation of church and state will in no way be infringed if all citizens of the United States, including those within religious organizations, be taxed.
Taxing the great religions, by which I mean, Christianity, Buddhism, Islam and to a lesser extent Hinduism should only be the first of many steps in the criminal prosecution of these diabolical organizations. Their property should immediately be confiscated by the state just as was done by England's King Henry VIII in 16th century England.
So the prevailing trend has been to support a businesses legal right to enact company and employee policies which adhere to a specific set of religious beliefs. That means, employees who work at those companies, whether they share those beliefs or not, are subject to those employee rules, benefits limitations and consumers are being marketed to based on religious beliefs. Sounds a lot like evangelism. Now we can say that employees, if they don't like it, can just get another job, but IMHO this sets businesses up to be pseudo religious organizations who pay taxes, attract employees who are also "followers" and cater to believers. Now...I'm okay with this as a trend, but it makes me think that the non-profit religious organizations and private businesses are sounding more alike, and the lines are blurring.
It is unfair that high ranking officials in large religions are making tons of money by exploiting people's faith. It would be more fair for religious organizations to be given tax exemptions as a privilege because they gave back to their community by doing charitable work. Taxing them won't destroy them, If they are taxed fairly it would help many people from getting exploited.
Religious exemption rewards pandering, coercion, forced tithing, and many political purposes to strengthen the underground economy that has become religion in the 21st Century.
Freedom from religion is the only fair way for States, and the Government to stay out of religious politics of competing groups designed for self perpetuating power through group cohesion. Religions are the worst peer pressure groups around, and should not be rewarded with tax exemption that allows all manner of disgused activities and relationships, whether criminal, or not.
Religious ingenuity is the worst thing ever to happen to the human race to separate peoples, and prevent harmony and unity - all in the name of godly reverence. Free God from human flaws, and free humans to be managed by governments invented for the purpose of managing disparate peoples!
The idea behind not taxing religion is to keep it out of politics. This while a good idea and thought but doesn't work this is shown in how all most all if not all presidential candidates (especially Republicans) make a huge deal out of their religion mostly christen. Not only that but most churches or temples or other places of worship talk about different aspects of politics. This shows that the church is already in politics and therefore if it is included it should be included fully this means taxes to make a profit for the state. My prior point aside there is also the idea of thinking of a church as a business. Before the point is risen yes churches could be counted as charities but they are not a non profit as in the priests or other holy people make a living off of it and while they should no be taxed as much as a fully for profit they still should be taxed with a tax break to even the playing field. And finally I come to my point on the profits from these taxes. It is known that while the amount does differ source to source it is consistently a large number even for government. This could allow the county to have a surplus lowering our debt and making us more independent. There is also the point of it is not a un-heard of un-tried idea it happened many times before in history one example being at the beginning of the Tang dynasty in china Buddhism started to become taxed and it went well the religion obviously didn't die in fact it brought in new followers and persisted not only in the world but in the same area strongly till the rise of communism in china. These points and more add to the point that the church should be taxed vote pro.
As a non believer who pays tax, why should I contribute to religion, they own business, they employ followers who still claim unemployment, they encourage purchases from each other's business (tax free) keeping the money in their community, enough is enough, Mormons, brethren, Scientology for petes sake, the behaviour of the Catholic Church is reprehensible, child care and educational scams, seriously when are we going to wake up, being a good person to the living is more important than glorifying the dead. Pissed of at society stupidly and gullible behaviour and laws.
It is a public good for everyone to be able to freely organize to exercise their religious persuasion (or not, if they so chose), so all institutions established for the exercise thereof, like other non-profit for-public-good groups, should be exempt from taxes. Tax-exemption exists also to protect minority religious groups from state interference - back in the day it was to protect groups like the Quakers, now it serves to protect, say, Muslim groups from an audit assault. Furthermore, religious groups very often provide public charitable services. Like other non-profit groups, they can raise money and hire staff, but may not be organized for the purpose of the financial benefit of private interests, like a business. Non-profits also may not participate in partisan politics and lobbying. I agree that some particular churches should lose their tax-exempt status due to their political and capitalistic engagements, but it is unreasonable to say that all should - unreasonable and dangerous. Tax-exemption protects religious freedom and the separation of church and state.
The governed would then give consent to the government to dictate what is to be presented to the people. And they would have no say in matters of personal belief, how they should conduct there religious events. When you have to pay in order to exist as a freedom, you will slip slide away into other areas such as non profit club for children eg. Soccer, girl guides, cub scouts, ect. Then there is non profit organizations for adults, anyone meeting, spending money of their own to establish anything non profit base, would have to pay a tax to exsist. The problem here is in the fact that the people who support a religous institution with their means, aready pay income tax, and tax for everything they use. Thats like you supporting your mom or dad or children and on top of your income tax and property tax, we will also tax you on your supporting anything more than yourself. This is a road I don't wont to go down.
The separation of church and state is a critical component of the freedoms that this country is supposed to uphold. If religious institutions are taxed, then it would destroy one of the core ideals this nation was founded upon and so it is unjustifiable, even if the income is attractive. The founding fathers wanted a federal republic, not a theocracy. If we're to keep religion out of our government, then we cannot be using them as revenue.
Churches aren't like a business or organisation where they make money from what they do. They are a group of human beings who decide they want to pool their own resources to have somewhere to worship their God.
These are people who have jobs and families and usually get taxed for those reasons. So taxing a Church would mean taxing all the people involved in it twice over.
As it is many churches haven't been able to keep up with the exorbitant expenses of keeping a Church, and it is illegal to run a church service anywhere else. There are people out there who will think this is a good thing and this is probably why they want to tax Churches in the first place. But when a Church dies it doesn't just affect them, it affects the community that surrounds them.
As it is many churches are struggling to find the funds they need to properly maintain themselves. On top of that many of them run programs to provide free or heavily discounted childcare and counselling where the Government doesn't provide it. These programs are expensive ones, and the people in the church take money out of their own pockets to cover them. If anything, Governments should be providing subsidies and maybe even funds to Churches.
The argument that Churches should have no say in terms of Government policy if they want to get tax exemption is also ill founded. If an individual who happens to participate in a Church decides to get involved in politics that's their affair.
The policy in most countries is to allow people to vote once they are a certain age, regardless of whether they have a job and pay taxes or not. They are a citizen of the country they live in so they should have a say.
Democracy is founded on the notion that the people who participate in it will all have different ideas about how things should be run. To say "These people have an idea about the world that I find primitive and frightening." isn't sufficient cause to prevent them from participating, or attempt to dictate how they vote.
Despite what people think Churches aren't some secret society like the Freemasons where they are given tacit preference. They are human beings capable of thought and reason who have living expenses to pay just like everyone else.
Yes I agree that some religious organization really seek profit. But is that all of them seek profit? Many of them made use of their profit in public, for example mental support etc. This will be unfair to those organization which not really seek profit. I suggest the government can tax those religious organization which seek profit but not the one which not really seek profit.
The key reason churches are not taxed is that taxing them would present the possibility of government forcing a church 'out of business' with excessive taxes. As it is currently structured, this has no shot of happening - a Christian/Muslim/Jewish community can't prevent a new church of a different religion by taxing it out of business.
If they do, then they should pay taxes. However, most churches spend what they need to on building maintenance and use the rest for various charitable causes. Why should they pay for the government's wasteful spending with money that they could use to help people far more effectively than the government does?