Amazon.com Widgets
  • Yes no kid should starve

    Yes schools should provide food because the parents might not be able to afford food because of medical issues or financial issues so to every one who says no don't think of it as the parents being irresponsible think of it as maybe something bad happened like they were robbed or they had to take care of a medical problem or they may have lost there job & put your self in those kids shoes how would you feel if some one said this how would you feel if you didn't get food at home or school so you had to starve just think about it

  • Yes no kid should starve

    Yes schools should provide food because the parents might not be able to afford food because of medical issues or financial issues so to every one who says no don't think of it as the parents being irresponsible think of it as maybe something bad happened like they were robbed or they had to take care of a medical problem or they may have lost there job & put your self in those kids shoes how would you feel if some one said this how would you feel if you didn't get food at home or school so you had to starve just think about it

  • Yes no kid should starve

    Yes schools should provide food because the parents might not be able to afford food because of medical issues or financial issues so to every one who says no don't think of it as the parents being irresponsible think of it as maybe something bad happened like they were robbed or they had to take care of a medical problem or they may have lost there job & put your self in those kids shoes how would you feel if some one said this how would you feel if you didn't get food at home or school so you had to starve just think about it

  • Yes no kid should starve

    Yes schools should provide food because the parents might not be able to afford food because of medical issues or financial issues so to every one who says no don't think of it as the parents being irresponsible think of it as maybe something bad happened like they were robbed or they had to take care of a medical problem or they may have lost there job & put your self in those kids shoes how would you feel if some one said this how would you feel if you didn't get food at home or school so you had to starve just think about it

  • Yes, they should.

    Schools should provide lunches for all children whether they are rich or poor. No child should have to go without eating because of difficulties in their life, and if we have it in our power to provide them with food than we should do so. It would be wrong not to.

  • No. Schools should not provide lunches to ANY child

    It is the responsibility of parents, not the school. To feed the children. If you can't afford it, then you should have thought about that before having kids. Once you have them, they are your responsibility. You need to feed and provide for your children even if it means you having to skip a meal or 2, work 80 hrs a day.

  • No, school should not provide lunches for every child

    Kids that have parents that can afford good food should not be subjected to eating lunchroom food. Schools should only provide food to kids that can't afford lunch. Those kids get what they deserve. Parents that can't afford school lunches are bad parents. There kids are bad kids because of poor parenting. Don't punish all the kids for the action of a few.

  • No, school should not provide lunches for every child.

    Kids that have parents that can afford good food should not be subjected to eating lunchroom food. Schools should only provide food to kids that can't afford lunch. Those kids get what they deserve. Parents that can't afford school lunches are bad parents. There kids are bad kids because of poor parenting. Don't punish all the kids for the action of a few.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.