Amazon.com Widgets
  • Yes, it makes more sense than other alternatives.

    Yes, scientists should test products on animals, because that is more humane than other options. The first option is to simply not develop the products. This is not a good solution because scientists develop drugs that help a lot of people. Scientists should not test on humans, because that would cause humans to suffer the harm that they are trying to prevent. Animal testing is best.

  • Its better than humans

    Humans could die from non tested products . I mean who cares if its one little rat , or a blue bellied lizard there are many of those animals . What else would they test their products on ? People that could die from those products . So thats what i think

  • Yes, scientist should because...

    If we don't test on animals what will we test on? Humans? No!
    If you have enough cold blood in you to hear a human scream of fear, please do it. Do it and then see what you have become.
    Animal testing shouldn't be banned because I bet you don't know how many products you use have been tested by animal testing. Your make-up, your shampoo. Really half of the stuff you use is by animal testing.
    And scientists use mostly over populated animals anyway, its not like they are using animals that are endangered like the Siberian tiger.
    They are mostly using rats (Which will most likely to be eaten by snakes) and rabbits.
    Really, the pictures that are on the internet of animal testing are only the bad projects gone wrong. And I bet that rarely happens.
    I'm not saying, "Yea! Lets take a bunch of animals and kill them!" Because that isn't what they are doing. They are creating medicine for everyone around the world.
    Did you know every 5 seconds a child dies in Africa from malaria. Well scientists are starting to create a cure for it by using animal testing.
    So pick. A rat, or a child.

  • They're not going to test humans before observing the effects on animals

    Animal testing is out of necessity. Drugs and medical supplies won't go through human trials without animal testing of some kind. Rats, mice, pigs and monkeys are, anatomically, very similar to humans. So, the results in some cases will be similar. The bleeding-heart tree huggers on the other side that scream and cry "animal rights" and "no living creature would have to suffer" have a very narrow-minded view on this subject. No one is going to run testing trials on murderers and rapists, because that violates their human rights. That's what the Nazis did in World War II. Like it or not, that is the reality. Further more, think about the success of animal testing. Vaccinations for viruses, deadly diseases and antidotes for poisons, none of that would exist without animal testing. Think about the Ibuprofen, Asthma inhalers and other drugs you have in your medicine cabinets. That would not be there without animal testing. So before you throw a hissy fit about what horrible person I am, do some research on the drugs and multivitamins you take everyday.

  • You could die test on animals

    Your relative bought a untested item then they use it. A couple days later they get sick after that comes the worst step death. Think about it you wouldn't want your relative to die. Humans are way more important then animals. Scientists should use products and different drugs on animals.

  • Better animals than humans.

    Scientists should test products on animals. It is better for them to test on animals than humans in case something were to go wrong. I would prefer to have a blind monkey from using the wrong eye liner than to have a blind person because the company was not allowed to test.

  • Humans Over Animals

    Lots of people are against animal testing. But really, if you think about it, who would you choose to live, a little girl or a rat. If you are human, you would choose the girl. If animal testing were not done, she could have died. If it was tested on the rat and it died, who cares? Thousands of rats and mice are killed at farms and in houses, so what's the difference? People should open up their minds a little bit more and try to find the positive things about animal testing.

  • Yes animals should be tested

    Animals should be tested on for medical reasons and for human resources, besides 95% of animals they test on are rats and mice. Theyre gonna die anyway I bet if you saw a mouse in your garage you would put traps to kill it predators will eat them so why do you care

  • Please Challenge Me!

    Anyone who opposes this opinion, i would love to debate it with you, and love to here what you have to say, because the points you are making are not making any sense to me in the slightest. Please challenge me i would love to here your personal side of this argument.

  • I agree but...

    Animal tests are good and bad they rarely kill them i bet. They are good because they can save lives. I don't think we have to it this way but what other chose do we have. If we don't test on animals then how would we find cures. I don't totally agree with animal testing but what else should we do.

  • HE** NO people

    You should not test on animals,Scientists Should Not Test Products on Animals, Animal testing should be banned, Product Testing on Animals a Bad Idea

    Without a doubt, scientists and companies shouldn't test products on animals for any reason. We use lab rates and monkeys on a regular basis, but such uses aren't necessarily ethical. Any product that poses a potential threat to an animal shouldn't be tested on that animal, even in the name of science.

  • HE** NO people

    You should not test on animals,Scientists Should Not Test Products on Animals, Animal testing should be banned, Product Testing on Animals a Bad Idea

    Without a doubt, scientists and companies shouldn't test products on animals for any reason. We use lab rates and monkeys on a regular basis, but such uses aren't necessarily ethical. Any product that poses a potential threat to an animal shouldn't be tested on that animal, even in the name of science.

  • No no no

    Animal testing is imperative for humanity. Being that nobody is about to allow testing on humans for potentially dangerous drugs, I believe that animal test is very important for the quality of our life. I think that animal testing allows us to push the boundaries of medicine in order to save the lives of humans around us.

  • No animals are like people

    I hate the fact that animals are used and sometimes are killed I pain. Also, when animals are used for testing they most likely are scared are shocked when they have medicine put into there system and when the animals die the scientist just throws the animal into a lime pit and I think that's mean because they just don't care!!!

  • No animals should not be used for reasearch

    They should test products on people who murdered families, products should not be tested on the poor little a poor little helpless animal like a rat or a rabbit. Products can sometimes be dangerous like they could cause a burning sensation also they could loose lot of skin by all of the products.

  • No,scientists should not test products on animals.

    No,scientists should not test products on animals.There's really no way for scientists to know how much sufferring an animal goes through so it really could amount to torture without any human really being aware of it.The safer way to go would be just to find other ways to test products in other ways so no living creature would have to suffer.

  • Product Testing on Animals a Bad Idea

    Without a doubt, scientists and companies shouldn't test products on animals for any reason. We use lab rates and monkeys on a regular basis, but such uses aren't necessarily ethical. Any product that poses a potential threat to an animal shouldn't be tested on that animal, even in the name of science.

  • Animals deserve to live!!!

    Almost all animals tested are killed. Animals deserve to live like humans. They are living things. We need to treat them with respect, just like we would like to be respected. I am completely against animal testing. Many animals die annually due to animal testing. We need to stop animal testing!!!

  • Scientists should not test products on animals.

    Although there are some cases where scientists should test medicines on animals, they should not test frivolous products on animals. If these products are necessary for human survival, their testing on animals can be justified. But animals should not be used to test cosmetic products because it violates laws of animal rights.

  • Scientists Should Not Test Products on Animals

    No, scientists should not test products on animals. Animals have the capacity to suffer and therefore have the right not to suffer needlessly. Many products that are tested on animals do cause needless suffering and harm. This is an affront to the animals' right to not suffer needlessly and thus scientists should not test products on animals.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.