Amazon.com Widgets
  • It is wrong

    Gay people could wipe out the entire race. If everyone was gay we would soon have a huge drop in population. I may sound selfish but gay people could ruin the population. It's also very very wrong and not the type of things I would want my kids around.

  • Teachers should be fired for being gay.

    They will be poisoning the minds of our children! I would not like my son/daughter to being taught that gay is okay. It's not! And I will pull them out if they keep the job! That is my opinion! And plus, how do you know that the teacher is not teaching the kids to be gay and flirting with them?! That is why!

  • If you don't hire them you will not have to fire them.

    The classroom is an extension of the household, many parents are relying on this extension to provide guidance in all walks of life. Would you fire a pedophile? A rapist? A satanist? Etc NO! Because you wont hire them. Everybody knows that its an extension of the home, why are you ignoring it? The problem is that people are living in shadows and not in the light and therefore present themselves as being "good" while their not. The process of hiring then is the question not the firing.

  • All teachers need to keep their sex lives out of schools.

    I think I speak for (almost) everyone when I say that teachers should not be espousing their sex lives in the classroom. And at that, a teacher talking adamantly about their sexual orientation, straight or not, leaves an impression on students that parents may not want.

    Here's the thing to remember: The teachers are not just employed by the school; they are employed by the parents; the US Taxpayer. If the teacher is doing their job poorly, or putting down an agenda to force on kids, or even discussing their personal lives instead of using the time that children are held to educate them, then they are not doing their job. If someone is not doing their job, they must be reprimanded.

    That being said:

    HOMOSEXUALITY IS A SEXUAL ORIENTATION. Let's underline sexual, shall we? There we go. All teachers need to keep their sex lives out of schools and not use it as an example when educating our children.

  • Yes I believe they should.

    Yes, Yes. I know. "It shouldnt matter if we have a male or female teacher, or black, white, Asian etc. Why should it matter who he or she likes? How does that effect the kids? Teachers dont have to share their personal lives. Also, I thought gay meant happy--the correct term is homosexual."

    But you must understand that, children follow the example of adults and older generations. And if you truly believe that you are creating "good moral citizens" by permitting "gays" then you are wrong. Sure, gays mean no "harm" to your children, but the way they act could effect your children morally and physically. You don't realize that you are taking away their innocence, and slowly twisting it into something that is not right. Disgusting!

  • Get them help instead, but do not give them a position to teach that this is normal

    Humans just are not created to function this way, why would it ever have to be accepted as the norm? No thanks, but I will teach my kids what is normal. When and Why would we need to be forced to accept this. No one really does, the more these people whine, the more others take notice how messed up the are! Ever wonder, just look at the parades when they feel they need to advertise.

  • Parents should choose

    They should have to announce this to all parents. Then allow the parent to chose if they want there child to attend the class or chose anothe teacher. Personally I would protect my child and say no. Gays, addicts, alcoholics, mentally ill should not access children at this critical age.

  • Yes they should be fired

    It's not normal, it's indoctrinates young minds and makes it look like it's ok to be gay which it isn't. Half of these iniquitous gay teachers are probably flirting with the pupils and flaunting their disgusting lifestyle. A teachers sex life shouldn't be discussed at all far less a gay sex life. Gay is a choice. If you were born with one leg you would be given a prosthetic leg it's the same with gay. If your gay go and get your head checked out.1

  • Subversion Perversion Machiavelli

    Being gay is learned, not innate.

    Its a form of perversion that should not be manifested in teachers.

    500 years Machiavelli stated that a "ruler", i.e. "ruling class", ought to feminize its male subjects as to neuter any kind of rebellion, the idea being that "men" are and have always traditionally been, the challengers and contenders of legitimate power.

    Feminism is just another way to control the male population. The elites have done everything to weaken their male subjects because of the following aphorisms; "A house divided, cannot stand" and because "Behind every good man, stands a good woman." Women are now the single most destructive force to families. They've been groomed to "self" destruct and initiate divorce. Women no longer listen to men, they listen to the jingling voices of their corporate masters who isolate them from men, men who in most instances of divorce, no longer have the "power" to raise their own children.

    Without political or economical backing, the LGBT would not exist. Why then would the cause of the LGBT, who represent between 1 and 2 percent of the population be over represented in the media and in government?

    Sure looks like a red herring to me or is it both that and a subterfuge?Because as we know, Corporations and the Government never do anything for free.

    What "interest" would these metaphysical entities have in not only tolerating, but promoting the LGBT.

    The LGBT only became a powerful lobby during the past five years. They sprang out of nowhere before the last presidential election.

    Now, the LGBT is a cause celebre. Soon, children as young as 9 will be taken by Childcare Services, from "abusive" parents who won't agree with "gender reassignment".

    This will happen and it'll all be normal because we'll have been exposed to teacher who'll gloat and publicly announce in front of their students, that being gay is 100 percent "normal", when the opposite would be true.

    To "impressionable" students, these very same teachers would appear to be "singular" and "cool". It would encourage plenty of students to "come out of the closet", a closet that seems to be getting bigger and bigger as more and more people are coming out as "gay". Its the nouveau cool thing to do. Its the nouveau "male bravado".

    Being gay is a perversion. Much like murder, its a spectrum, one that can be indulged on different levels, yet murder is unacceptable in our society. During WW2, Governments on all sides, made murders and rapists out of common citizens. It was normalized, so much so that regular people "heartily" laughed at General Patton's televised retelling of his genocidal deeds.

    As insane as it may sound to us, rape and murder was de rigueur in that time. Just because it was fashionable at the time, it doesn't negate the fact that "War is crime". Tolstoy.

    During the Romantic Era, in droves "lovelorn" men were committing suicide, in "fashion" with that time. Monkey see Monkey do.

  • Subversion Perversion Machiavelli

    Being gay is learned, not innate.

    Its a form of perversion that should not be manifested in teachers.

    500 years Machiavelli stated that a "ruler", i.e. "ruling class", ought to feminize its male subjects as to neuter any kind of rebellion, the idea being that "men" are and have always traditionally been, the challengers and contenders of legitimate power.

    Feminism is just another way to control the male population. The elites have done everything to weaken their male subjects because of the following aphorisms; "A house divided, cannot stand" and because "Behind every good man, stands a good woman." Women are now the single most destructive force to families. They've been groomed to "self" destruct and initiate divorce. Women no longer listen to men, they listen to the jingling voices of their corporate masters who isolate them from men, men who in most instances of divorce, no longer have the "power" to raise their own children.

    Without political or economical backing, the LGBT would not exist. Why then would the cause of the LGBT, who represent between 1 and 2 percent of the population be over represented in the media and in government?

    Sure looks like a red herring to me or is it both that and a subterfuge?Because as we know, Corporations and the Government never do anything for free.

    What "interest" would these metaphysical entities have in not only tolerating, but promoting the LGBT.

    The LGBT only became a powerful lobby during the past five years. They sprang out of nowhere before the last presidential election.

    Now, the LGBT is a cause celebre. Soon, children as young as 9 will be taken by Childcare Services, from "abusive" parents who won't agree with "gender reassignment".

    This will happen and it'll all be normal because we'll have been exposed to teacher who'll gloat and publicly announce in front of their students, that being gay is 100 percent "normal", when the opposite would be true.

    To "impressionable" students, these very same teachers would appear to be "singular" and "cool". It would encourage plenty of students to "come out of the closet", a closet that seems to be getting bigger and bigger as more and more people are coming out as "gay". Its the nouveau cool thing to do. Its the nouveau "male bravado".

    Being gay is a perversion. Much like murder, its a spectrum, one that can be indulged on different levels, yet murder is unacceptable in our society. During WW2, Governments on all sides, made murders and rapists out of common citizens. It was normalized, so much so that regular people "heartily" laughed at General Patton's televised retelling of his genocidal deeds.

    As insane as it may sound to us, rape and murder was de rigueur in that time. Just because it was fashionable at the time, it doesn't negate the fact that "War is crime". Tolstoy.

    During the Romantic Era, in droves "lovelorn" men were committing suicide, in "fashion" with that time. Monkey see Monkey do.

    Posted by: byob
  • Do they choose it?

    You cant choose to be gay... Why then would something you cant control influence your ability to work? Should they all work as hairdressers or garbage men because they don't share the same interests as you do? Should they become outcasts and shunned out because of their sexual orientation? They shouldn't. Period.

  • Not at all

    My Favorite teacher is a lesbian. It really doesn't matter what your sexuality is. At all. America needs to get over our christian nation pride and realize we're being oppressive morons. Its cruel to stop people from living their lives just based on who they like, and it bugs me that that could even be an option.

  • Why would it matter

    A teachers sexual life should not be the business of any of their students nor the department of education. Teachers are there to teach, how can their sexual preference have any bearing on that? I mean if the teacher was spending their time talking to the kids about sexuality instead of teaching they should be fired but that's no different from a teacher who spends their time talking about anything that isn't relevant instead of teaching.

  • Freedom of Expression!

    Teachers are american citizens too! They have every right to be gay as much as everybody else and there is no problem with it! It doesnt affect schooling for children so what does it matter! There's also the first amendment which is freedom of expression! Its in the constitution! Americans are in a free country!

  • The Word Is NO

    A Teacher That Is Committed To Helping Students Learn And Prepare For Life Through Studies Is Not Thinking Of Their Own Sexual Exploits Etc..They Are Thinking About The Well Being Of The Student. I Personally Experienced A Teacher Named Mr. Stacy Whom Was A 7th Grade Teacher That Was Married, Had Children And Had An Affair With A Student In The 7th Grade. He Was Caught Picking Her Up In The Kmart Parking Lot On A Friday Night After She Told Her Parents She Was Staying With A Friend. Just Because Someone Is GAY Doesn't Make Them A Threat To A Student, It's The Individual And That Is The Basis Of My Vote!

  • No, a teacher should not be fired for being gay.

    That is pure discrimination. The sexual orientation of a person has nothing to do with their ability to teach. A teacher does not push his sexuality on their students, and if they do, then, and only then should they be dismissed. I had plenty of teachers whom were gay when I was in high school. They were the best listeners and definitely fun teaching the classes.

  • It would be regression.

    Yes, regression. If we fire teachers for being gay it would be the same type of discrimination we were dealing with in the Civil Rights-era. Anyone who says otherwise is ignorant, because discrimination = discrimination. After all of the supposed 'advancements' our society had made on the issue why would we regress back to the ways of ignorance solely based on someone's sexuality, which by all means is a private matter. Heterosexual teachers do not make their sexuality explicit to students, so why would homosexual teachers? Think about it.

  • It is discrimination.

    It is unequal treatment based on sex, religion, place of birth , race or any other arbitrary characteristic. The teacher is not heterosexual she/he may like the same sex however that doesn't mean they are child molesters and are going to try something on a child. That also doesn't indicate they are going to try to be more than pals with someone that is of the same sex simply because of that fact ergo firing a teacher on account of their gender preference in a mate is discrimination and is under the law ILLEGAL. No American citizen should be discriminated by their preference in a mate!

  • No, teachers should not be fired for being gay.

    Teachers should not be fired for being gay, because sexual orientation should be a non-issue. There is never a situation in class or anywhere relating to school where a teacher's personal life should be discussed in detail. The teacher's merit is based on ability to teach, demonstrate appropriate behavior in front of students, and inspire success. Appropriate behavior may be open to interpretation and subject to discussion if the teacher chooses to share personal information through social media or in the classroom. Discussing anything else other than teaching qualifications distracts from education and pulls us into a debate that is not relevant to our student's academic futures.

  • No, a teacher should not be fired for being gay.

    That is pure discrimination. The sexual orientation of a person has nothing to do with their ability to teach. A teacher does not push his sexuality on their students, and if they do, then, and only then should they be dismissed. I had plenty of teachers whom were gay when I was in high school. They were the best listeners and definitely fun teaching the classes.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.