The Second Amendment (Amendment II) was adopted in 1791 and it is not suitable for the modern society anymore. We need to ban guns and make our society safer. Too many people are killed by guns each year. We cannot ignore this problem any longer.
Violence is out of control. Guns are a major cause. They all should be banned – the sooner the better.
We are in a everchanging world. So why be afraid of change if it is aready happening all around you. Some amendments are just not up to par with todays society. It still says that African Americans are 3/5 of a human that is riduculous and needs to be changed.
Some of the amendments were created 200 years ago and our society has changed. These amendments are carefully enacted and should not be changed without a huge overwhelming majority.
Many things have changed since the Constitution was written and its contents should reflect these changes for the benefit of all citizens. Time
changes everything and the Constitution should keep up with the times.
The only thing that doesn't change is the change itself. Therefore, the change is inevitable and needed. How can a society catch up with others unless it does not internalize the change in itself in the globalized world? By keeping unchanged articles that protect some social values, all other articles can be revised and changed over time.
Many amendments were made under the circumstances of the time period of which they were made. One example is the third amendment, which allows people to decide whether or not soldiers stay in their homes. This amendment was made during the revolutionary war, when soldiers would take over people’s homes for living quarters, because states had their own militias, and the U.S. didn’t have an established army with bases across the country like it does now. Not many American soldiers are trying to take over our homes nowadays. Another outdated amendment is the 12th amendment, which is the amendment that establishes the electoral college. This was made because they only wanted educated people voting. In today’s society however, people know more about politics and have a more clear understanding of who and what they’re voting on. Candidates just use this outdated amendment to manipulate the voting system. And changing the constitution doesn’t “take our freedoms away”. Even now, amendments can be ratified and repealed, changing them. One example is the 18th amendment which banned all sales of alcohol. When it was found to be a bad idea, they created the 21st amendment, which repealed the 18th amendment. The document itself was an experimental document, made for a society over 200 years ago, for a government style that had not yet been known. Even Thomas Jefferson himself believed the constitution should be changed every 19 years, to be able to stay with the times. Almost all countries that have constitutions change them, or revise them after certain time periods. And simply adding amendments, articles, clauses, sections, etc just turns the constitution into a confusing and contradicting document. Contrary to some others’ opinions there is something wrong with it.
When the constitution was created it had a set of rights, these rights were the base of what we should have. For instance the freedom of speech is a right that should be given but now that we have it's being exploited to show and do things that nearly everyone deems bad.
As an American I have the fundamental right to be able to go for a walk down the street, go to Church, my job and even the movies without the fear of being shot. We are no longer a civilized society, times have changed and we must change with them.
The past is the past and the future is the future. We no longer live in the past and there are big changes and laws that have been made wich have nothing to do with the constitution amendments we have now. This is my evidence on why we have to change this.
We have never changed it and if we did then is would be more helpful but if we leave it the same like it was, all those amendments were from back then and things are different now. And this is my evidence of why we should change this issue occurring.
The corrupt goverment is trying to take our 2nd amendment right away so we are defenceless. Less people die when there are more guns around so why should we ban them. Feinstein wants to ban assault rifles even though it wasn't used in the newtown shooting! There is a video of it being recieved from Lanza's car! The goverment wants to change the constitution to take our rights away! They set up these mass shootings just to take guns away. And they are getting away with it. The constutution is our last defence from tyrannical goverment and thats why it shouldn't be changed!
Everyone is saying "change, change!" Why change it if there is nothing wrong with it. The Constitution includes everything. If you don't agree, read the 10th amendment. The Constitution in no way says that African Americans are 3/5 human. I completely agree with "LimpingChauncey64." This idea gives the government the chance to take away our precious freedoms. Imagine an hourglass. Our freedoms are the sand. The small hole that allow the sand to fall is the government and we are the top half of the glass. Over time our freedoms are taken away from us. Sadly, this hourglass cannot be flipped over once more. When our freedoms are gone..they are gone
Once we allow any of the Amendments to be tampered with in any way, we lose our Constitutional rights. It will give the government the options to remove, change or alter, any Amendments they deem necessary for the protection of national security. Americans do not understand how many rights we lost to the Homeland Security Act.
The founding fathers set America on the right track, and now corrupt people are trying to adjust the Constitution to suit their needs and ideas. The founding fathers knew this would happen, this was the whole point behind writing the Constitution. The Constitution should not be tampered with. Who is to say that the Constitution should change?
I think that the constitution should not be changed beacuse it hasent been since it was written and i think thats amazing! i mean it has taken us from horses and buggys to the technology we have today. also i think that it would be very hard to change and leave it with the qualities it has today.
Guns will always be available....Even if they are made illegal. But if they are illegal then no one can buy guns, an example of this being bad would be that no fathers can buy a gun to protect his family in case of a criminal with a black market gun raping and robbing him.
We swear an oath to protect the constitution from enemies foreign and domestic. Yes, that means that the day could come where it is your duty to take up arms against our own government. Sounds crazy? Give up your rights and there is nothing to stand between freedom and tyranny. Couldn't happen here? I hope your right. Our government has the duty to serve us not the other way around. That is why the founders of this Great country worded the constitution and its amendments in the manner that they did. Their biggest fear was the Government getting too powerful and subjugating it's citizens!
I have a right to keep a gun in my house. Guns don't kill people, people kill people. It's not the guns fault that somebody took it and used it for badness. That's like banning all dogs because they bite and kill people and other dogs. Ever think that's because the people train them that way? The constitution has worked for so long. Why change what works?
There is no point to change the amendments to our Constitution. Keep what has kept our country together since our Founding Fathers wrote such an inspiring document. In order to keep up with "the times" why not update and add new amendments? Why does updating mean having to wipe out the original rights listed. If we changed the original amendments this would only limit our rights even more. Corruption is behind amending the Constitution...Plain and simple. Don't do it!
Theres nothing wrong with the guns, its just the people that are buying them. Mabet if it was a little bit harder to obtain them and mabey implement some backround checks then we would have less shootings. We wouldnt have to change the amendments fir this but just add more.