Amazon.com Widgets
  • Indians don't know how to manage country

    If you look at the development that India made on its own, the development is done more in things like corruption and reservation. We show that India is great, but its all fake. We still carry all the rotten thoughts, specifically people in villages and politicians. Simon, come back again.

  • British are great rulers

    India would not be divided between Pakistan and Bangladesh. It would be a superpower. Population would be under control. A true democracy with accountability. A mere 300 thousand British administered the whole of India and kept control over 350 million Indians. This shows excellent management styles. Almost everything that is in existence was made by the British raj. India needs a joint parliamentary representation that is based on British values since what they left behind was a legal, political and social system that works for everyone. Let the british back and India will flourish again.

  • Dictatorship would develop India

    British rule was India's golden period. Once we started following western culture, we can't stop. So British rule is the best to eradicate corruption, may be poverty and laziness, intolerance, irresponsibility among us. I think dictatorship is the only way to get India out of this worst situation. May India Develop.

  • Dictatorship would develop India

    British rule was India's golden period. Once we started following western culture, we can't stop. So British rule is the best to eradicate corruption, may be poverty and laziness, intolerance, irresponsibility among us. I think dictatorship is the only way to get India out of this worst situation. May India Develop.

  • Yes the British rule should be there

    British rule or British policy should have been here in India. They always did a good job of keeping the quality stuff in India. Indians now talk about people not having jobs but during British times, Indians did have a job, so what if they were doing anything? At least the jobs were not distinguished as positive or
    Negative.

  • Britain or Germany to take India

    The official British rule in India was equivalent to an old persons lifetime 1858-1947. 1947 I suppose a lot of your parents were born then or very young at that time. But this time Britain or Germany because the Germans know how to run a successful country, should treat the native Indians with respect rather than take take. Let's face it, yes India does have a growing economy and they have successful wildlife conservation. But the problem with India is population control, there needs to be rule of one child per couple. But most of their cities towns etc are well....Shit holes except places like Chandigarh, Chennai, Shimla , Bangalore, Hyderabad and a lesser extent Kolkata. Crime, Health, Population and Polutions are the key issues in India.

  • British would prove more honest in accomplishing tasks than local ministers

    New arrangement and world order is being looked upon. The present affair of our ministers is taking us nowhere. Ample waste of public money and development of Swiss banks. New laws can be framed giving Indians equal rights to British citizens. Live as brothers together.
    Hongkong was better under British.

  • Aye, India should be part of the United Kingdom Of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.

    India should become part of The United Kingdom again. The Indian populous would be represented in their own Parliament and England's parliament. Additionally they wouldn't deal with protests and such in a violent manner. Especially since India would be represented.
    Also it would be beneficial for both, through India getting infrastructure built and industry, and the UK would benefit also.
    I conclude that India should be part of the UK (British 'Empire')

  • Aye, India should be part of the United Kingdom Of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.

    India should become part of The United Kingdom again. The Indian populous would be represented in their own Parliament and England's parliament. Additionally they wouldn't deal with protests and such in a violent manner. Especially since India would be represented.
    Also it would be beneficial for both, through India getting infrastructure built and industry, and the UK would benefit also.
    I conclude that India should be part of the UK (British 'Empire')

  • Yes British should Rule India Again.

    India was way better under British Rule. And I never believed that British were actually cruel and Indians were godly peace loving creatures. There was no such this called India nor there were creatures called Indians before British came to India and united all the little ass kingdoms that were fighting among each other.

  • No British shouldn't rule again.

    Before the British came to India ,it was the richest country in the world.After the Britishers came to India they took all the raw material from India .And when the Britishers went back to their country,India was poor and industrial backward . India had 50 percentage of raw materials before the Britishers came to India and it had decreased to 25 percentage.

  • No British shouldn't rule again.

    Before the British came to India ,it was the richest country in the world.After the Britishers came to India they took all the raw material from India .And when the Britishers went back to their country,India was poor and industrial backward . India had 50 percentage of raw materials before the Britishers came to India and it had decreased to 25 percentage.

  • No way, never

    India had all the natural resources it needed to catch up technologically eventually. Evolution even in nature is convergent, over time every resourceful land would grow and evolve.

    China is a perfect example to show what a non-European country can do without being pushed around by a bunch of white supremacists.

  • No, The British should not rule India again.

    No, I don't think the British should rule India again. India freed itself from British rule and it should stay their way. Since India has gained it's independence, Improved health care and increased food production has improved the Indian people’s lives. India has also became the world's largest democracy since independence.

  • We are Indians we are independent

    If British ruled India we would have died out of scarcity. British will rule over Indians,they would separate each states into countries to make us unhappy and begin wars between each states,each relatives etc..India would have lost its diversity...No happiness will befall India a heavenly country.We are Indians and we are not dependent...

  • We are Indians we are independent

    If British ruled India we would have died out of scarcity. British will rule over Indians,they would separate each states into countries to make us unhappy and begin wars between each states,each relatives etc..India would have lost its diversity...No happiness will befall India a heavenly country.We are Indians and we are not dependent...

  • We are Indians we are independent

    If British ruled India we would have died out of scarcity. British will rule over Indians,they would separate each states into countries to make us unhappy and begin wars between each states,each relatives etc..India would have lost its diversity...No happiness will befall India a heavenly country.We are Indians and we are not dependent...

  • We are Indians we are independent

    If British ruled India we would have died out of scarcity. British will rule over Indians,they would separate each states into countries to make us unhappy and begin wars between each states,each relatives etc..India would have lost its diversity...No happiness will befall India a heavenly country.We are Indians and we are not dependent...

  • We are Indians we are independent

    If British ruled India we would have died out of scarcity. British will rule over Indians,they would separate each states into countries to make us unhappy and begin wars between each states,each relatives etc..India would have lost its diversity...No happiness will befall India a heavenly country.We are Indians and we are not dependent...

  • We are Indians we are independent

    If British ruled India we would have died out of scarcity. British will rule over Indians,they would separate each states into countries to make us unhappy and begin wars between each states,each relatives etc..India would have lost its diversity...No happiness will befall India a heavenly country.We are Indians and we are not dependent...


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
Agnostic2911 says2014-01-24T07:27:40.167
Can the British rule themselves considering the current day scenario and the time is not too far where you will have a small India and a Pak state within Britain, they can rule that.