Yes, the consumption of endangered species should be outlawed. Endangered species need to be protected from all dangers. Killing an endangered species for any reason should be outlawed. An endangered species should automatically be a protected species, no questions asked. They fact that they are not always protected is ludicrous.
Yes, the consumption of endangered species should be outlawed. An endangered species by definition is a species that is seriously at risk of extinction. Therefore, these endangered species should be just as protected from consumption as they are from poaching and hunting in order to prevent the extinction of the species.
Many believe that the consumption of endangered species is wrong because it will lead to the animals becoming extinct. However, consuming popular foods creates a market for raising them. Consuming endangered species would motivate entrepreneurs to raise these animals, thus ensuring that they never become extinct. Therefore, the best way to help an endangered specie is to eat them, so that the market will supply more of the animal.
While many think that death penalty is a reasonable punishment for serious crimes, being an effective deterrent and reduce costs on prison. However, this raises many issues, in particular whether it is a violation of human rights. Even criminals how far beyond redemption he/ she is, still deserves the basic human rights, based on the notion of equality for all human beings. Moreover, this also removes the act of wrongly taking an innocent life away if the case of a person being falsely charged were to happen. In many developed countries such as Sweden, Norway, and Denmark, there is no death penalty and yet they are experiencing the lowest rates of serious crimes in Europe. This means that death penalty does not necessary cause fewer crimes, but rather, a humane and rehabilitative treatment of convicts does.