Amazon.com Widgets

Should the government give more funding to the arts?

  • The production can earn back funds with ticket sales.

    When you need funding for props for a production or a location for a production/exhibition, the ticket sales for the production/exhibition
    on all three or four days the production is performed or the week the exhibition is around can easily earn a lot of money back for the government. The government should definitely learn that it can earn the money it funds for the arts, so they should fund more.

  • They should be

    It's not even funny anymore but the funding of the arts is replegamatory. The societal imbalancement of pure constructive values and implementations is extremetively misconstrued. Big words make a lot of sense and as does funding the arts. Therefore, hereditoler meanings can be delved from the inner parts of art.

  • The arts need more funding.

    With the budget being cut in art programs, less people are encouraged to join because when they see what the arts program is doing they don't see what the arts program is capable of. With limited funding, the music department can't have to proper equipment it needs to function properly and to get music and to get rights to musicals. The drama department won't have money for sets, costumes, and play rights. The lack of funding isn't letting the arts program reach its full potential and because of that less people are joining because what they see, they don't like, and what the arts program is "given" is not enough for us to manage.

  • Doctor who and art is good

    The topics art and doctor who are important for our next generation to Know. The arts have meaning and are deep . Doctor who is So good it is probably why police boxes are actually still around and what helped that The arts. So do you really want none of this . Oh and DOCTOR WHO IS BAE

  • It really should.

    It really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really really should.

  • Doctor who and art is good

    The topics art and doctor who are important for our next generation to Know. The arts have meaning and are deep . Doctor who is So good it is probably why police boxes are actually still around and what helped that The arts. So do you really want none of this . Oh and DOCTOR WHO IS BAE

  • Doctor who and art is good

    The topics art and doctor who are important for our next generation to Know. The arts have meaning and are deep . Doctor who is So good it is probably why police boxes are actually still around and what helped that The arts. So do you really want none of this . Oh and DOCTOR WHO IS BAE

  • Yes Its good

    Kids these days don't get to learn much art , drama, etc. because the government doesn't fund it. They only focus on math, science, social studies, and language arts. Children use their creativity less and less, each year, each month, each week, each day, and each hour. It's very sad.

  • Yes, the arts should be supported and funded by government.

    I am convinced that government should finance the arts. There are many branches wich are not able to survive without additional support from the state authorities. Therefore, governments should fund some kind of the arts which should be scrutinized before. The governments should be assured that they do not support low quolity art. Because, there are more important branches that should be funded first. For instance, education, traffic and health care.
    Tu put it briefly, the government should support the arts by additional money, but not all the arts. I am conscious that there are more important sectors. In addition to that, there are many kind of art movements which interesting enought for people and so they do not neet any support.

  • Yes We Should

    I believe the United States should given more funding to the arts. I believe the country needs more public art projects to uphold the population of artists in our country. I think our social well being could be uplifted in these projects. Government funded art projects have been an important part of history but it doesn't seem like the US funds these type of projects.

  • The economy needs to be in better shape first.

    The arts are nice and should be funded, but the economy has to be in good shape first. Until the economy is doing better, the focus should be on things that are needed such as schools, social services, highways and transportation, and so on. Once employment is up and there are more funds that can be given, the arts can be funded more.

  • No, the government should not give more funding to the arts.

    I am not prepared to say that all government art funding should end, or that art has no value. I just don't see what we get out of the government's art funding program. If people make good art, other people will pay them for it. The government is not funding these people that make good art, it is funding people that cannot make art good enough to sell. This is an overly simplified view, but it is one shared by much of the population.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.