Should the government regulate fast food?

Should the government regulate fast food?
41% Say Yes
59% Say No
  • Of course, hold them accountable for the best interest of the American public.

    We are constantly plagued on T.V on the causes of smoking as on the average human being, and how it leads to an early grave, but the truth is, there is a correlation between the two, however, it's not confirmed, what I mean is, some chain smokers won't contract lung cancers, as other small time smokers will. As is the case with fast food, which debilitates and clogs each and every individual with fatty foods and preservatives. Now, I'm going to go out on limb and proclaim that the fast food industry is causing more harm then ciggarette companies.
    My opinion?
    The pillaging and destruction of animal livestock, now I'm not a vegetarian, we needed meat to evolve and become were we are today, I'm not doubting that. But that was with the forced and regular exercise of the average life back in those hard, tough days of old, now we have our electric scooters, so we can put that extremely painful task of walking behind us. But overall, like nearly every human being in this current capitalist society, we thrive on others vices, this vice however destroys the land, animals, people and our health. And what have they received for their disregard for human health?
    Nothing, absolutely nothing. They've successfully impregnated the media with their 'fun' and 'care free' attitude, hoping and praying on peoples ignorance laziness. It's about time the mindless masses have woken up and smelled the fresh air, or the foul stench of the fattening meat shoved into their nostrils by these corporations. I'm not asking for a ban, i'm just asking for them to be held in the same standard of smoking.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Yes, because it is very unhealthy!

    By eating fast food, people can get disabilities and other diseases. They can become unhealthy and malnourished. Fast food is the worst food ever to come up in American society. You may say it's taking away freedom but I say better healthy than unhealthy. People get obese, too. People get sick or die from fast food everyday. We as a community should do something about this!!!

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • We all need to be more Socially Responsible!

    Parents are step 1 in teaching good eating habits. But obviously with Between 16 and 33 percent of children and adolescents being obese in the US. This isn't working. The annual cost ...to society for obesity is estimated at nearly $100 billion. If that doesn't make cooperations want to be more socially responsible then I don't know what will. I think if cooperations refuse to be responsible we need a Government institution to force them to be. I believe the CDC or another institution (USDA? or maybe we need to make one!) needs to start stepping it up and have striker guidelines on the crap they serve at Fast Food restaurants as well as in our schools. The nutrition kids receive in the states is hideous. I think more education for parents and children on proper nutrition is very important too. I mean do we really need to have vending machines in schools? Soda? Pizza? If you want to serve your kids that crap at home fine but don't make it available at school there is no place for it in schools. Esp. in the middle of a Obesity epidemic. Bottom line, Overweight children are much more likely to become overweight adults unless they adopt and maintain healthier patterns of eating and exercise. And the chances of that happening with the fast food craze restaurants marketing straight to kids is slim to none esp if they or their parent's don't receive any education on proper nutrition or how to change their eating habits. We aren't as a society being socially responsible. We need to adopt a 'People before profit' mentality when it comes to 'Fast Food' Just because your a good parent and you wouldn't necessarily make these choices doesn't mean it's okay to turn a blind eye to what's really going on out their. It's easy to say well its the parent I wouldn't handle it that way .. I have 'self control' .... but truth is obviously a lot of people don't and we have to start seeing this trend and stopping it. IF you read the childhood obesity Stats it's obvious that many people in many countries have no willpower and yes it is scary to think about how this leads into ot...her things in their lives. We are raising a generation of lazy, indulgent, and entitled kids if you ask me. It may be hard to see from a 'good parent' point of view, but I think this definitely comes down to will power. I went into it above more but obviously some parents don't know how to say No. Just because us responsible parents would doesn't mean we can say it's their fault entirely for not. Children and parents are bombarded by marketing and branding on all sorts of items but we don't teach them how to say NO or how to make proper nutrition choices (nutrition isn't taught in most schools, in fact most schools do quiet the opposites, school lunches are packed with cheap crap food & hallways are lined with Vending machines .. I mean really what kind of message is this sending to this generation of kids?) ... I do think that all marketing to kids should be band. I don't want to see my kids favorite cartoon character plastered over everything just trying to get me to buy it because my kid has a temper tantrum in a store. You can honestly say you have never yourself or seen somebody you know just give in to stop a tantrum. I know I'm guilty of that if I'm being honest. My kids don't work they don't have money they shouldn't be a marketing demographic. Period. This is one of the main reasons IF my kids get TV it's a DVD so there are no commercials brain washing them to ask me for the same thing over & over. I think as a nation we need to open our eyes and start looking out for what is best for us as a whole. Heart Disease and Diabetes related illness are two of the biggest killers in the country right now and both can largely be contributed to the poor eating habits of our nation. I think it's time we all took more social responsibility in this I guess.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • People are very unhealthy nowadays

    More and more people are getting various types of diseases, and other food-related issues simply because food companies use unhealthy practices. The average American doesn't even know how to read a food label. If the government stepped in to make sure that the companies weren't taking advantage of the average consumer, and used proper and safe practices, every American would be healthier. The government wouldn't be taking away our freedoms, they would be helping us.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Yes, I agree that fast food should be regulated!

    Do you really know what is being produced in fast food restaurants? Go and watch You Tube's video "McDonald's 4 year old cheeseburger" video. I actually tried this and after 6 months, the burger was the same and the fries didn't rot. Now tell me, how is food suppose to not turn bad or rot after 4 years? There are things put into foods at fast food restaurants that make us want them. It isn't healthy for us and that's why we live in a society were obesity is increasing, diabetes, heart disease and much more. So many people worry about their health, but they can be complaining while eating at a fast food restaurant. If we want to try and find a way to reduce the number of deaths and diseases each year there needs to be something done about this. Even now kids are starting to develop Type II diabetes, which use to only be developed in adults. So much for trying to create a better place for the future generations. That will not happen if our kids are already at a risk of premature deaths. Not saying that this is all done by fast food restaurants, but it is a factor that aids in it.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Sadly, yes.

    Although we do have the right to eat what we want, fast food is just too unhealthy. If anything, it should be regulated for children. It has become too easy for a kid to go to a McDonald's or Burger King and get a couple hundred calories worth of food in just a burger and fries. What's worse is that this all costs a couple of bucks. I don't mind having fast food once a week for lunch, but eating fast food everyday of the week for breakfast and lunch is just too much.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • I do believe that fast food has become so prevalent, and is so unhealthy, that government should start regulating it.

    Fast food has become such a large industry and is now such a big part of people's diets. And, as a result, it is playing such a large role, not only in people's lives, but in their health, that the government has a responsibility to start regulating the industry for the safety of the citizens.

    Posted by: ToughEfrain26
  • Why Not?

    The government regulates our insurance, our pensions, our schooling (that thing that's the foundation for our future?) They regulate grocery store food, why not fast food? Worst that happens is we get a fast food rations or they make fast food healthier (oh god, please, ANYTHING BUT THAT) I see no bad from government intervention, and all good (creation of more jobs, healthier "meals to go", etc.) Worst case scenario is the government tanks it and we repeal it (or have people forgotten the public can do that?).

    So screw it, let's educate people as to why they have diabetes, and how they should feel useless for taking it to the point where "I'm a victim of circumstance, I can't help but eat fast food."

    The problem with the "no" option? People will not be enforced in any way, shape or form, other than what is already enforced, to form new habits. Government intervention WILL send a wake up call.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • I believe fast food needs to be regulated.

    The U.S. is a country with one of the highest obesity rates in the world. So, what's the problem? The problem is that while buying fresh vegetables at a farmers market will cost over a dollar, a burger costs 99 cents and will fill you up after eating it. Especially now with unemployment so low, people are forced to pay for cheap, unhealthy dinners with not many other choices. They are forced to question, would I rather be healthy, or would I rather support my family? This is not a choice someone would have to make.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Everyone who says the government has something better to do is a fool. The government is not one person! It can do multiple things at a time.

    America is full of obese people, and obesity leads to heart disease and other major health risks. The problem is we are spending more tax dollars on taking care of these people who get too unhealthy and start to live off your tax dollars. I don't like taking care of someone who stays home and eats Oreos all day. Do you? Well lets solve the issue by regulating fast food and junk food for that matter. It's not another form of control. It's not like the government proposed this idea. It is coming from the people. If you do some research on what is in fast food, where it comes from and how bad it is for your health, then you will agree with this proposal and wonder why you ever ate fast food in your life. Dont think of it as freedom being taken away, think of it as the bad guy fast food chains getting rich off serving you tasty c*** and not caring about what it does to you.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • yeah are you kidding

    If they don't whats stopping these giant corporations from using awful ingredients that are extremely detrimental to your health. These companies love to find cost saving shortcuts at the expense of your health. Regulations keep them in check while providing food that isn't going to kill you if you live on it. Fast food will always be cheap regardless of regulations, the market is simply to competitive.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Some fast food is hardly fit for human consumption and should be regulated by the government.

    Much of the meat found in fast foods nowadays is hardly fit for human consumption, to say nothing of the evils that were acted out to produce it. If the government regulated the fast food industry it may be able to keep such harmful and disgusting foods from being produced at all which would have a positive impact on the environment.

    Posted by: Wynn354
  • Yes, regulate fast food.

    In some way the population should take care of how they eat. However, I just don't see people doing it on there own, they could, but I don't see it. I think we need a healthier society whether they do it on there own or the government did it for us. Really. Truly. We are killing ourselves with, fake, processed food.. Not that it should be banned.. Perhaps.. Just.. Not so much.

  • The government should regulate fast food because research has shown that fast food can cause health problems.

    Health insurance premiums will keep going up as long as fast food restaurants are allowed to sell consequence free food that may help kill you faster. When you go to a fast food restaurant, there is little to no food that is sold there that will have much of a positive effect upon your body. Cigarettes and alcohol are heavily regulated by the government and fast food should also be included on this list because like cigarettes and alcohol, fast food can contribute to a faster mortality.

    Posted by: R3ubHockey
  • We need to stop obesity before it gets to out of hand.

    Many children and adults are increasingly becoming obese, and by having the government step in and cut out this unhealthy food, it would greatly help with the way people eat. Instead of having unhealthy food sold at these fast food restaurants, they should sell all healthy foods and I feel that the government should enforce this. Children are learning at a young age that it is okay to drink all of this soda and eat fried food all the time and with the governments help of getting rid of fast food, I think that we could potentially help obesity and stop it from getting worse.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • It should be given in moderation

    Not everyone knows what moderation is. Some people don't even know the meaning of being full, rather they eat till they're "stuffed". If there is some regulation it should be on the portions that are being offered on the menus. Especially when there are not only adults eating it but also kids.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Hollywood, Commercial, and Printed Advertisement is not popular

    What we see as children growing up and what children now are seeing is not popular for our culture in today's society. Movies promoting unhealthy food that's because actor's or actresses are cool in the minds of most Americans. Commercials using fit people to promote their crappy foods, knowing darn well that those actors and actresses in those commercials do not eat fast food. I am guilty of eating fast food and I am guilty of letting my child eat fast food, but only in moderation. I do not eat Fast Food for Morning, Lunch, and Dinner. Me and my family eat more home cooked meals. This has nothing to do with freedom, my rights as an American. This is America! Mumbo Jumbo Garbage!. Food is a drug and you can easily get addicted to food, just like you get addicted to Alcohol or prescription drugs. So why not regulate Fast Food. If you limited what times you can sell Fast Food, just like Alcohol, then maybe some people might get years added on to their life span. Bad food goes hand in hand with health care. Sad to say Fast Food is not really regulated. It is up to you to be educated about what is a healthy life style.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • If you can't think of a better argument than that...

    Doesn't involve your "right" and "freedom" to gorge yourself sick with fast-food then please, enlighten me. Fast food should not exist, or rather, the MSG's and additives lurking inside of that Big Mac you so happily shove into your gluttonous mouth. This argument would not even exist if the government better regulated what goes in our foods, but it's all about the profit, isn't it? Who cares if someone gets diabetes or heart problems because they are being crushed by their own weight, due to the fact MSG's and additives cause food addiction?

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Yes government should regulate fast food industries.

    The chemicals in fast food make a person become addicted. The stuff you are eating isn't fresh! Inside of McDonald's apple pie are duck feathers. Yes, the ingredients may be on the label but look up what the chemical really is. The chemicals in fast food mess with the leptin levels in your brain.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Come on now

    Regulating fast food doesn't mean McDonald's or Burger King will be gone. Before the theory of fascism appears, a cool head must contemplate the issue. Asking a corporation not to include cancer-causing chemicals seems responsible. When fast food becomes a drug, there needs to be a line. Yes, people are forced to it. Kids with parents who don't make a lot of money have to eat what their parents give them. Poverty can force a person to eat the stuff in front of them. Corporations should not be killing a country (literally) with no stop. A healthy America is a strong America!

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Yes

    We have to many people dieing and losing their lives to fast food because they cant control themselves, fast food is clearly linked to a number of illnesses, little kids are being diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, 2/3 of adults are overweight, kids and adolescents are overweight. Since the people cant control themselves to be responsible enough to eat moderatly and exercise efficently, then the obviously their not ready to make the decision for themselves. this country is turning fat, lazy and unhealthy and its sickening

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Millions of people eat fast food every day, which exposes them to many unknown and potentially harmful or even fatal consequences. Each person has the right to eat at safe establishments that are licensed to be open by the govt.

    Yearly there are disturbing reports of restaurants that are not following proper health codes and people are getting quite sick and some albeit it far more rarely die from the problem. Government's involvement is the only way to at least attempt to head off lazy or poor health management to the pubic.

    Posted by: Ramon Griffith
  • The government should regulate the fast food industry.

    The fast food industry is a part of the American lifestyle, but it is not a good part of it. Fast food is horrible for one's health, and many people eat way too much fast food, causing obesity problems. These obesity problems raise the cost of health insurance for everyone whether they are obese or not. If the government regulated the fast food industry and controlled the nutrition of the food they sell, many benefits would come about.

    Posted by: Lex58
  • We are the land of the obese and the home of the big mac

    If you think about how much money the US spends on advertising for junk food and the cost of medical bills each year you would see that we spend billions of dollars on people with conditions linked to junk food and obesity. If the government thinks they can help by regulating junk food then they should.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • I believe it would serve the public interest for there to be regulations put into place to regulate fast food.

    America keeps getting fatter and more unhealthy. It is expected that by the year 2050, one in every three adults will have a form of diabetes. I am not so sure this is solely because of fast food, or whether it is because of other factors. The marketplace is being flooded with genetically-modified organisms (GMO). No one knows what the ultimate outcome will be from introducing GMO into the world's food supply. Americans seem to be the guinea pigs in this experiment, with Europe being the control. In Europe, the use of GMO are not as widespread as it is here. Many companies in Europe, like Kellogg's for instance, do not use GMO in their products, yet in the U.S., it does. Taco Bell uses GMO foods in their products here in the U.S., but in Europe, they do not. So yes, I do believe there needs to be regulations put into place. However, the FDA should not be the organization to do it. In my opinion, the FDA has only worsened the situation by seemingly implementing regulations which increase revenue at the expense of the public health that they were established to protect.

    Posted by: GCrystal
  • Yes to Fast Food Regulation

    Fast food needs to be regulated because obesity is a national epidemic that needs to stop. Not only is fast food harmful to a local community, but to a nation. One in every three children is obese and restaurants do not even have a limit or healthier options. Both children and adults are developing new avoidable diseases such as diabetes and high cholesterol that should not be an issue. If people managed to eat healthier and exercised, having fast food would not be a problem. The issue is that people can not set a limit to the type of food they are consuming, being very harmful to their health.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Fast food is hazardous

    Fast food provides unhealthy products to the customers; they lack of essential nutrients such as vitamins, contains high quantity of fats and sodium, causing hypertension and heart problems. Besides, statistics made throughout the world show that fast food consumption is a major cause of obesity. However, the fast food market is growing in several countries and is gaining a bigger part of the market. Therefore, the government should apply some policies in order to restrict the impact of these fast food companies, like their advertisements on children.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • yes

    Yes they should regulate fast food. If you think about that how many people are in USA obese, cant work, some of them just can't eve move or walk, have diabetes, high blood pressure....that's a lots of money for health insurance. This people maybe cant work, so rest will pay with tax for their insurance. The children grow in up on high calorie pizzas, taco bell, McDonald's , just poor nutrition. Also studies shows that people who are eating just fast food have a lower IQ. What can be a future in such a country? Sick and obese people can't build a strong country. Eat what you wanna eat people but sometimes you shouldn't think just about yourself. You should think about your country. But very sad that people in USA just dont even care about that what their children eat. They just dont get it how important to say no for fast food. American should learn from Europe. In Europe have a dinner in a restaurant much more expensive, but the portions are smaller and they give you just one glas of drink, otherwise you have to pay for every glas. But what you get is quality food and almost every product are half so sweet than in USA. Just walk on the street look around how fat people are?! Is this America? Is this a healty America? How can you have a strong country with sick people? Your choice will be your children's choice because they are learning from their parents. Sick parents having sick children and a sick country.

  • Excessive Consumerism is not Freedom, it's a disease.

    Fast food should be strongly regulated along with cigarettes and Alcohol. A major concern in the U.S is how the Government can invest in making healthcare cheaper and even universal. We should focus not on making healthcare itself cheaper or free, instead we should focus on making the American people healthier. Our society is currently plagued by Materialism and Consumerist degeneracy that only contributes to further problems. Does are parent stop feeding their child simply because that child does not want to eat? Of course not, the parent does it because they know its for the best. This is the case, the Government needs to pose hard restrictions on fast food restaurants, they should encourage daily exercise and fitness activities. A healthy America is a strong America. One can argue that's it's part of their individual rights to buy as much garbage as they desire, that's its part of their freedom. In my opinion stuffing your face with chemicals, fats, sugars and high calorie foods, drinks and other substances is not freedom, their not individual "rights", it's slavery and suicide. Government regulations at times are bad, however this is a time in which I believe Government regulation is necessary. It's for the best.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Junk food has become a reflexive part of how we explain why so many Americans are overweight, particularly those with lower incomes.

    A meal of real food cooked at home can easily contain more calories, most of them of the "healthy" variety. Hyperprocessed food remains more expensive than food cooked at home, because you can serve a bit portion for couple of days because cooked food at home is more healthier than junk food.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • yes of course.

    Obesity is an increasing issue in our country. Yes we have the power to choose what we want to eat but it should be regulated. How do people expect to run a sustainable government with lazy obese people? We have to do something about it! Places that sell soda should be encouraged to serve a smaller bottle. Diabetes and other diseases will be decreased if we take action on people's diets. Less people sick means less people who are in the hospital. All the obese people in the hospital are taking money from us to use toward healthcare. Why should we have to pay for them??

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Govt. Ought To Keep This Industry Honest

    If there isn't regulation for the fast food industry, the public will never know for sure what they're eating. People will still eat fast food, this is inevitable. However, with FDA regulations and stricter enforcement of sanitation and health guidelines, we can feel better about those that do choose to eat at these chains. If we can't be certain of the food's content, we shouldn't be eating it.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Fast Food should be regulated by Government

    Fast food is a growing industry which is subject to abuse, both in terms of the fat content as well as in terms of quality. Fast food facilities are subject to inspections by the local department of health, in order to ensure the facility is clean, does not have insect infestations, as well as adequate heating and cooling elements to preserve uncooked food and food once it is prepared and waiting to be deliverer. By regulating the quality of the food itself, specifically the trans-fat content, harmful by-products which are found in the food can be eliminated. While some may consider this to be another example of government intrusion, no one argues that prohibiting smoking in movie theaters, airplanes, restaurants, and bars, is wrong. It is a matter of the general public realizing that by regulating the content of the food, the public will benefit in the long run.

    Posted by: AGalloway
  • Why not?

    What we see as children growing up and what children now are seeing is not popular for our culture in today's society. Movies promoting unhealthy food that's because actor's or actresses are cool in the minds of most Americans. Commercials using fit people to promote their crappy foods, knowing darn well that those actors and actresses in those commercials do not eat fast food. I am guilty of eating fast food and I am guilty of letting my child eat fast food, but only in moderation. I do not eat Fast Food for Morning, Lunch, and Dinner. Me and my family eat more home cooked meals. This has nothing to do with freedom, my rights as an American. This is America! Mumbo Jumbo Garbage!. Food is a drug and you can easily get addicted to food, just like you get addicted to Alcohol or prescription drugs. So why not regulate Fast Food. If you limited what times you can sell Fast Food, just like Alcohol, then maybe some people might get years added on to their life span. Bad food goes hand in hand with health care. Sad to say Fast Food is not really regulated. It is up to you to be educated about what is a healthy life style.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Absolutely

    I have always viewed the job of the government like that of a parent. Their job is to protect and provide in our best interests. To be a great country, we need to be filled with great people. Regulating would stop you from having choices, nor will it keep you from getting fat, but it would provide the country the fighting chance to live a long and healthy life with minimal chances for disease and suffering. I child doesn't know how to feed themselves beyond shoving food in their mouths. Parents are suppose to teach them what food is good for you and what is not. Our parents are suppose to teach us to be better...teach us. If this same government is good enough to pay for your food, pay you for not working, give you the rights you want, why are they not good enough to make sure you are not killing yourselves? I find it funny that when people get sick from their food choices, they run to the government to help them get better but they don't want the government to provide them only healthier choices to prevent these ailments. Ironic. I wouldn't worry about it though. To many people in higher places have their hands in the pocket of fast food and medical industries. They would lose too much. They make more money when you make more bad choices. So essentially, you are doing what they want. Good for you.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • The government should regulate fast food, because obesity and other diet-related health problems affect a wide range of government concerns, from the cost of Medicare/Medicaid, to military physical fitness requirements.

    Obesity in the United States is an epidemic. The very phrase alone is becoming trite from repetition. But, it is a travesty that a country with our wealth and our level of scientific advancement is actually experiencing declining life expectancy, en masse. Obesity and diet-related health problems add to the cost of health insurance and, consequently, to Medicare/Medicaid expenses. Obesity is also a threat to national security: a recent study showed that, as of 2005, almost 30% of males aged 17-24 were too fat for military service. A group of over 130 retired generals, admirals, and senior officers has implored the government to intervene, especially in schools. The government should intervene, as it has in the past, to regulate food safety and controlled substances.

    Posted by: TenBernardo61
  • It would be for our good.

    Everyone makes it seem so terrible that the government might one day require McDonald's to use actual chicken, instead of the mystery meat they currently use. This country eats some of the worst grade food on the planet, and maybe that's why we have the highest obesity rate in the world. Everyone will cry their eyes out so the government won't take away the Big Mac, UNTIL they gain 200 pounds, OR catch a disease from whatever chemical the fast-food companies want to put into your food, then they will beg the government to shut down these restaurants. It could help us all to lose weight.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Dede_12311

    The government should mandate food choices because nowdays children has the most problems dealing with being over weight. Parents needs to coach their kids to ask for fruit or water not chips and soda. To be honest their killing the kids more than people advertising on TV or inside stores.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • The government should not interfere with people's free will and agency.

    Even God doesn't tell us what to eat...there are consequences though. If I eat garbage, I become garbage. Works for me. Thin the herd! The more people that kill themselves with bad choices, the fewer people I have to put up with. I do agree that the school systems need to do a better job educating the children and enforcing activities. When did physical fitness become second to art class? I love art, but fitness provides a much-needed life skill for everyone.

  • The government should not regulate fast food.

    Unfortunately fast food is a big industry. There are many people who take advantage of the quick meal option and obesity in our country shows it. However, I don't feel that government should have any hand in the regulations of it. There is no harm that one can cause to another person by eating fast food. The only person that can be harmed is the person eating the food and we make our own choices. I don't agree with the statement that "fast food made me fat". It was not the food that caused the obesity...it was the fact that the individual chose to eat it. At least in America individuals have the right to chose what they eat and if it is fast food that we chose then we should face our own consequences.

    Posted by: w00tboycomic
  • It's our choice. Not theirs.

    We should be more responsible with what we eat. If I eat a large fry at McDonald's, I am making that choice. No ones holding a gun to my head and saying "Eat the fatty food!". So why should the government say what we can or can't eat? They're acting like baby-sitters. Although people should be more educated about their food by sticking a calorie amount next to my French fries won't matter, but maybe I'll think twice when I know EVERYTHING about it. So if they spent the time and energy they use to ban OUR food to educate, Americans might be less obese.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Should the government regulate fast food?

    No! Well because we have rights in this country, and if the government regulates fast food that is taking our rights of being Americans away from us. We have choices good or bad choices in which we make and when people make the opposite choice of good that is their choice no one tells that person to eat junk! That is their choice! If the government regulates on fast food they might as well regulate everything else, no just kidding that would be awful.

  • The government should not regulate what people do in their daily lives

    Why should the government tell people what to eat and what not to eat? Every person on this world ultimately has the responsibility to look out for themselves. And what about government telling people that their not able to buy a product 'for their own good', doesn't that seem a little authoritarian? What if the government told a man that he couldn't buy a plant for his garden because it might give off the wrong smell for the neighborhood? What if the government told a woman she couldn't go to the gym anymore because gym's were shown to cause the spreading of certain diseases? Ultimately I think it's a person prerogative if they want to live an unhealthy and obese lifestyle, and it should not be in the governments power to take that away.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • No, We have a right to eat what we want.

    Its people's choices to eat what they want. If it kills them that's there stupid fault for eating it. The government doesn't put a gun to our head and force us to eat it. It is our choice, and if it hurts us than that's our stupid fault.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • No

    This is America. It is the land and home of the FREE. If the government takes control over what we eat than what else are they going try and control. It is straight up communism. Also all fast food employees will lose there jobs which is not what we need right now in America.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Human Right to Choose What to Eat

    If the government can control what people eat then they can control what people do say or anything. I understand it is a problem but it is our right to eat what we want. There are other ways to influence healthy habits on society. This may sound bad but even if there were no fast food there would still be people on welfare and it would probably be the same people!

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • since when did we start resorting to fascism.

    It is ridiculous that the government feels as if it has the right to regulate what we eat. Isn`t the whole concept behind the "American way of life", that we can make choices without the government swooping in and slapping us on the wrist.The whole argument boils down to whether or not you believe that a few extra dollars for health care is more important than our free will. I for one dont like the obesity epidemic sweeping the nation, or have any desire to reach that point myself, but i also recognize that if people really dont mind the criticism and health problems that follow that way of life then thats their right.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • No, the government should not be entitled to the decisions of U.S. citizens

    There is zero obligation regarding fast food consumption. No human being has been choked to death for not eating fast food. Plus, it is only a travesty when an individual solely burdens self with this habit and diet. It does leave the government in a tight spot, but I argue it is not the government's problem regarding health care. The government should be in service for the people of the U.S. But is the system taken serious or is it taken advantage of? I never asked to pay for a gluttonous tubalub who does not take care of their body because of emotionaldistress. Everybody has stress, but should others suffer on their behalf?

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • I believe that the government should not regulate fast food, we live in a free country so we should be able to do what we want.

    I'd be the first person to tell you that many Americans are overweight and have numerous heath problems due to fast food addictions, even I have the need for the occasional 'greasy fix', but when it comes right down to it, being American means that we have the freedom to make those types of decisions for ourselves. I truly believe that the government has bigger things to worry about than what I want to eat.

    Posted by: C0rnGet
  • I do not think government should regulate fast food, because I think it should spend its time and resources on more important matters.

    Since when did fast food become the most important thing that our government could be working on? I think it's more important that our government officials spend their time working on solutions for economic development and creating jobs. That does not mean creating a vast array of food inspectors to watch our diets.

    Posted by: SuddenRashad84
  • Trying to increase world peace, environmental issues are more important

    Our government should regulate the fast food industry instead the should regulate the companies supplying these fast food chains. Companies like the meat producing one should get regulated and asked to be fully aware and conscious to what they put in their beef before they sell it off to food chains just to make a fast buck.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Nope.

    We are in control of what we eat, everyone has the ability to step away and say no. I don't think everyone needs someone to hold their hand when picking out what there going to eat. Lets take Responsibility into our own hands. It seems that many things brought up lately are voiced before thinking about it. As always make sure to keep an open mind (Liberal-Conservative alike.)

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • The government should not regulate fast food because the restaurants run on the hard work of growing made by the owners over a period of time.

    The government may run the country, but they don't build up a company from the ground up. The owners that pursue a career and decide to start their own fast food chain takes a lot of money that they earn and it is bad enough the government takes a lot of taxes from them. They work hard and sweat so much from running a business. The government already owns most of what we control.

    Posted by: waffletime
  • The government shouldn't regulate food.

    The government should regulate what eat just because we are an obese country! We live in a country that is free of choice. We should be able to eat what we want, whenever we want. If we want to indolged in something we do. The govt should only try to promote healthy eating not replace everything with the better choice. Its freedom of speech and we have the choice to choose what we want to eat, not told what to eat.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • No, whatever happened to free business?

    It's the consumers choice to buy what they wish. If I want a double cheeseburger, you better believe I'm going to buy one. I want to open a fast food chain? That's my prerogative, my business, and my choice. We will make our own choices, not "accept" the choices that are made for us.

  • The government should not regulate fast food because it's my right to eat what I want.

    The government should not regulate fast food because it's my right to eat what I want. I know it's fatty and greasy and high-calorie. That's why I stopped there. Sometimes I want something comforting and being bombarded with calorie counts isn't going to stop me from eating or returning, but it's going to make it less fun. It's not good to take the fun out of someone's occasional indulgence.

    Posted by: H0bi3Invader
  • The Government has but ONE Job

    America is a democracy and in no way can be held accountable for its citizen's choices and decisions. The American government is supposed to uphold our preference, not tell us what we can and cannot do with our lives. Only if we endanger others with what we choose to do on our pursuit of happiness, only then may they intervene and withhold our rights -- only IF we are proven guilty. How do we endanger other's by endangering ourselves. Is it truly possible to throw a McDonald's hamburger at someone and expect it to cause any physical harm?

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • absolutely NO

    first all food can be a problem for some people.
    allergies ,intolerance, genetics so if one thing is banned
    it might make someone rat what is no good for them.
    secondly who is making the rules food scientists ,doctors or a government bureaucrat? or even worse a political entity who makes decisions on getting reelected.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Id rather have all the freedom in the world and not be safe than to have all the safety in the world and not be free

    I think government has already went too far into are lives telling us that we can't put things into our own bodies even if they are dangerous Thomas Jefferson said "I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." If we start letting government tell us what we can eat what next are we going to let them regulate toilet paper because there a kind that will hurt your butt because its so rough?? lol i know its an extreme example but i think with education you can pursuade people. I also believe GMO food has something to do with the health of americans these days too there is evidence to support it but it rarely gets out because monsanto doesn't want it to.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • I do not think that the government should have a power to regulate fast food.

    It is mind blowing that this question is even being raised, in my mind. The government should not only not have the power to regulate fast food, but people should not NEED the government to regulate fast food. It does not seem that unrealistic in my mind that people eat fast food in moderation, and exercise regularly. Why in the world would the U.S. government need to spend money and time, that could be used else, on regulating how much grease we take in our diets.

    Posted by: 5h4rdEgbe
  • Freedom

    It is people's choice what they want to eat, the government should have nothing to do with it. I do not care if it is bad for you, we have the freedom to do what we want with our own bodies. Besides, the government has better things to do than to worry about food.

  • Freedom of choice

    It is completely up to the people if they want to eat fast food or not. Every american that buys fast food is capable of buying nutritious foods, and cooking them at home for the same price. The core democratic value Individual Rights, it explains that people have the right to life, liberty and economic freedom. According to this fact, it is the peoples choice of what they want to consume, and how they spend their money.

  • Government isn't the solution to the problem government is the problem.

    It's hard to imagine what the average citizen would do if government suddenly abandoned its overly nurturing approach to every social ill. I suppose that would mean that people would have to develop self reliance skills centered on personal responsibilities for one's actions. Anyone who doesn't know that the average fast food restaurant does not serve health food is truly oblivious to reality. Government should only exist to serve two major purposes: Ensuring the security of the nation from threats and paving roads. Unfortunately, we live in a society that adheres to the notion of entitlement. Many seek ?free? government handouts that are funded through higher taxes. If anyone has visited a local DMV Office or mailed a package with the post office they know that the government cannot oversee the simplest of tasks. What makes anyone think that government can run the personal lives of 330 Million Americans?

    Posted by: snuggle muffin
  • No!

    When we let the government regulate everything they become more powerful and run practically everything. People, wake up! The government now chooses what type of light bulbs we can buy, how often we can flush the toilet (yes, really!) and much more. We need to be aware!
    I think the manager should be in charge--the franchises, people! Go Mitt Romney!

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • What comes next?

    If you give up one freedom because you think its just a little thing like what to eat and heck we could use the help - then what's next? Giving up a small freedom leads to giving up another small freedom, say like privacy on the internet, heck let the government be more intrusive and track where you go and what you do, its for security, maybe you really don't know what internet sites are really good for you, like you can't pick you own food. There goes freedom of choice and freedom of privacy. What next--lets see--oh, heck we like Mexico allot, tacos, burritos, yum - wait that is if its okay to eat, but hey lets drop the boarders and let anyone in, they deserve a good life, heck let them have the jobs we just don't want to do, good for them. That is 2 freedoms gone and 1 right gone- freedom of choice and privacy and the right to defend our boarders/security. Rolling your eyes at me - "oh how freaking paranoid can you get" - not so, socialist and communist countries all started that way. Look at the history of Russia, china, and what happened in Hitler's Germany - it all started with small changes, giving up rights to government till the government grew so large and powerful that it took over everything. The citizens thought in the terms of: my government wouldn't do that to me, couldn't do that to me, but they could and they did because the citizens fell for the promises of politicians that said "we will take care of you, we care about you, trust us" - don't trust - don't be greedy and want free living - it puts chains on you that take years and maybe never to get back off!

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • McDonalds is guilty of making 'health hazard' food. We are guilty of buying it.

    Nobody's putting a gun to our head and telling us we have to eat fast food. Obesity and health problems are caused by many other things, lack of nutrition as well as lack of exercise. If you chose to eat large french fries daily, then it's your choice. If you chose to sit on the couch and watch 4 seasons of a television program rather than going out for exercise, then that's your choice too. Stop blaming everything on everyone and take some goddamn responsibility. Blaming fast food industries for increasing obesity is the same as blaming the distribution of guns for school shootings. We choose what we do and that is what affects our lives. No one is forcing us to do anything.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • It's beyond bad for you!

    Fast food is just as unhealthy as the "nasty" school food. The same companies who regulate food found in stores is the same and just as bad for you as junk food. The government shouldn't be providing you with fattening food when obesity is already an epidemic problem and would just continue to get worse by regulating fast food.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • People should be allowed to eat what they want.

    A lot of Americans eat fast food and the government should not try to change that. If people get fat on fast food it's on them. America is supposed to be a free contry, but how are we free when the government is trying to control what we consume. Peoples personal health should not be the governments concert or really anyone elses concern, but themselves.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Why should the government be in charge of our free choice!

    It's us as american citizens who have the ability to make healthy habits for ourselves. Why help the people who chose to eat such unhealthy eating styles when the government could do better things with their time?

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • I do not believe that the government should regulate fast food because the onus needs to be taken by parents and society as a whole.

    If we expect the government to intervene in all aspects of our lifestyle issues we are probably expecting too much of them. Moreover there are consumer forums that could intervene and take a stand in this matter. Parents should encourage their children to make healthy eating and lifestyle choices.

    Posted by: WittyRud
  • My FREEDOM is being taken AWAY!

    We all know that fast food is bad for you, and I'm sure it sucks to see obese people walking around. But it's their choice what they do with their body and the government doesn't need to take any part in this! If the government takes control in this, they'll start banning other stupid things, and soon we'll be living in a communist country ruled by crazy people. The last thing this country needs is the government ruling what we eat and what we consume. If this happens, I'm leaving.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • NO FREAKING WAY!

    If you say that people cant eat what they want you are first of all bound to have so many protests going on and plus people should be responsible for their own selves so if they want to eat themselves to the grave let them do it. Its not your responsibility to tell us what we can and cannot eat its unfair and we be the main country region state whatever we are talking about how we are a free country and we have the freedom to speak so give us the freedom to eat! Telling people they cant eat what they want is just like telling us we cant say what we want, controlling and unfair!

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • It is inappropriate

    It's wrong for the government to tell us what we can and cannot eat, they already have enough power over us as it is. It is inappropriate because if they regulate what we eat, what is next? What we wear? Where we go? It just doesn't seem right to me.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Its my choice.

    Everyone know fast food is bad for you, and we all know the risk when we order a double bacon cheeseburger, we have the option to eat healthier. Its not the governments job to keep me healthy. If we can't even choose for ourselves what to eat without them stepping in, I can't imagine whats next.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Nope!

    We live in America- people all over the world immigrate here to enjoy the rights and freedoms of the individual. If the government starts to control what we eat, what may be next? What we think and believe eventually. And then we've become Nazi Germany. I'm not saying health regulations would make our governments Nazis. But things start out small. The government publishes so many PSA's and positive marketing to eat healthy for the public, and it is ultimately the individuals right and responsibility to choose what they put into their own body.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • freedom of choice

    All mature adults are individually responsible for his or her own act of action. Every person has the choice to choose healthy food from fat fast food. Everyone is different and can eat what ever they want, and as long as the information of the substance is near it there is no need for the government to intervene.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • It's a choice, it's not force-fed.

    Buying fast food is a choice. It's a choice for people to eat questionable food. If you can't afford healthy food, then grow your own food or get a (better) job! Seed packets don't cost that much. Head to the local library, research, and learn how to grow a garden, can food, etc. If you live in the city, learn to be more conservative so that you don't waste your money on unnecessary things. Sorry if I characterized many city people as being liberal. If you're conservative, good for you.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Not at all.

    Indeed there is a large number of health disorders related to fast food in America-obesity, diabetes, high BP, etc and the list goes on...the government instead of regulating it must focus on making people aware of it. the effects of imposing regulations wil further create loss of jobs, growth will slow down. in short it is AGAINST democracy and freedom of the people. Organize health awareness camps, educate students in school/college about it, protest against unhealthy practises in the kitchen.
    But, in schools i do believe the institutions must offer more healthy food alternatives to fast food options to promote this culture of eating healthy right from the start. IMPOSING IS NON-DEMOCRATIC AND AGAINST THE IDEA OF A FREE WORLD

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Isn't this the land of the free???

    NO, government shouldn't regulate fast food... we have our own choices to make! What about the first amendment that says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Stop micromanaging!!

    The government should not micromanage every aspect of our lives and our businesses. If a person wants to eat healthy, then they should pick where to go. I know that if I go to the burger stand down the road, their fries are cooked in the same stuff that Grandma used 50 years ago. But, that is my choice. I don't need the government to watch out for me and my health. I am an adult, therefore I make the choices regarding my health.

    Posted by: R34llyAla
  • The government should not be able regulate fast food because the theory of laissez faire.

    I believe that governments should not be able to regulate companies that produce fast food. This is because it is up to the consumer of what they want to eat, and if they decide to eat fast food, they know that the consequences of eating too much is bad for them. If they decide to eat it every day, it is definitely not the government's problem to see what foods their people eat and what they do not eat. It is solely up to the company to come out with healthier foods which taste the same as the normal food but are less in the amount of calories, fat calories, etc.

    Posted by: N34rIyGaIv
  • our bodies

    its our bodies and what ever we to put into it we should be our choice if we get fat oh well we decided to put that junk into our bodies now we hove to deal with the consequences OUR BODIES OUR LIFE OUR CHOICE

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • We have the freedom to choose what we eat.

    Why should they regulate fast food? They already regulate most of the things we eat. People arent forced to eat fast food, they choose to. So why should we be told what we can or cant eat? We have the power to choose what we want to eat, not what other people want us to.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Nope Not ever

    Yes its true that many people get eating disorders and all kinds of sicknesses but people should learn to control themselves and not be selfish and all not go all favourly on Fast foods BECAUSE I CONTROL MYSELF AND I DONT GET SICKNESSES AND NO WONDER I LOVE FAST FOODS!!
    BUT I CONTROL MYSELF UNLIKE ANYONE ELSE!!

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Even though it is a great idea, it would create more problems than it would solve.

    If the government tried to regulate fast food, it would be a monumental undertaking that would take years and millions of dollars to put into effect. The red tape, all the paperwork, committees, staffing, it would be a disaster. A more viable alternative would be to mandate the amounts of harmful ingredients allowed in fast foods. Make these companies slash the amount of salt they use, restrict the oils they use, and how much fat is allowed to be in the food.

    Posted by: PinkMych
  • FREEDOM TO CHOSE

    This is our choice if we want to fuel our body with this fast food, that is our decision and our choice. The government should not be given enough power to take away all of our freedom. The reason this country was started was to keep freedom and by banning or as the government likes to say 'regulating' sodas and fast food our rights are being thrown away. I'd like to know what's next everyone has to wear white clothes, say the same thing, do the same thing, not be unique and be who we are. I'd like to know why the government has been taking away our rights not our obesity.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • Oh Hell No.

    Yes why should they regulate fast food? People aren't forced to eat fast food, they can choose. Why should we be told what we can or can't eat? We have the power to choose what we want to eat, not what other people want us to. This would violate one of the laws of the Consumer Bill of rights and that is the right to choose.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • No the government should not regulate junk food

    If Americans are educated enough to read then they are smart enough to know what they are eating when they choose to consume something. I just find it silly that this is even a topic. Plus for the parents that are making such a big deal out of it, you're an adult, feed your children what you want to, the government doesn't need to be behind you in order to show your a good parent.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • What is the government supposed to dictate?

    Scientists have proved food effect the brain like drugs and therefore the 'junk' food are addictive. This is backed up by the fact that over 80% of people suffering from a serious mental illness are overweight and/or obese, and many of them are too self conscious to exercise in public. Programs are designed to fight food addiction just like programs for drug addiction. These programs also give self conscious people the courage to work out and burn the fat. Studies have proven this more effective than anything else previously tried. Also, if we're only talking about fast food, obese people can just go out and buy some sugary snacks at a gas station or something. Not only obese people go to fast food places. Many people who need a quick and fast meal go there as well. This would put many thousands of people out of a job and hurt many major businesses. But first and foremost, why should the government be able to say what we can and can't eat. Life is full of choices. All choices have consequences. Why shouldn't people be in charge of their own choices? If someone wants to eat fast food, they should be able to eat fast food but know that the food they're eating isn't healthy. If they don't want to be fat, they should work off the calories they gained.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • The fact that the majority says no is exactly why we are where we are today

    Hey SuddenRashad, "creating a vast array of food inspectors" whatever that means...creating food inspector jobs would as you so eloquently put it would be working toward a solution for economic development and creating jobs...i mean it is job creation right? And the guy below you that thinks "if people get fat on fast food its on them"...no its not just on them partner, health care costs rise because of obesity, consequently increasing your premiums for health care...or my premiums for health care because someone else eats without regard and has a heart attack at 35. So not...its not just on themselves, everyone foots in the bill including the government.

  • I don't think the government has any business regulating fast food.

    It's my opinion that the government has their nose in too much of our personal business as it is. I do not think they should have any say so in the foods we eat nor do I think they should control how and what we eat. We have other issues that need to be addressed and I do not feel this is one that the government needs to worry about.

    Posted by: SlipArnal
  • The Government should not have a say in this.

    I agree that companies have to regulated in how the food is produced and how processed/clean it is, but that's where the line should end. When the government tries to regulate how much of something I at, that is out right wrong. When they shorten the calories for anything such as cafeteria food, who's to say what's enough for someone that Is 6'6 and someone who's 5'0 should they have to order a tiny meal, it might fill one of them up, but than anyone larger than that would have to buy 1+ lunches, which is probably more unhealthy than just leaving it alone. If people want to eat fast food, let them eat fast food, not strings attached, you'll eat what you want and how much of what you want anyways, there wills still be ways around it. The government should spend their time, money and efforts elsewhere.

    Posted by: Anonymous
  • The government should not regulate fast food because people should have the right to decide what they eat themselves.

    The government should not have the right to regulate fast food because to do so would be an insult to the intelligence of the nation. Citizens should have the right to choose what to eat, and if the government feels citizens are not prepared to make healthy choices, it should help to educate its citizens better. I support government's mandating that fast food places post their calorie contents and reveal what is in their food so consumers can be informed and have something to base their decisions on.

    Posted by: EImerBuddie


No comments yet.
Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
Copyright © 2013 Debate.org. All rights reserved.