A 3smlgjghg jgjgjgj iii wef a[o oughaugh;v sbvsidvb;asked ioe[aowiehgao'iev sguha;og sjdfhg iwiw dd xjxjjj wqos pals help me lol and alsdad this would be kina sc lsd [oilsdlkugjweoin fuuny 2 o 2 sdkvnaolsdv iweohfgq[ lknmjt[ efoaihewgo[aweGN SNSKJG jisodhga sjfb;V HAHAHHAH jarg;abv jabv;aiebvk vdn iuNv idgvN DI islgn;jk ihng;kjer ps9uihnr eorpgj] isr
Scientific research is something that is very important to understanding ourselves and the world around us. Even if there is not an immediate practical use for something, the research that a scientist does could go on to benefit mankind in the future. We should try to encourage critical thinking and problem solving.
Yes, research should be supported in every field possible, because science is the one thing that pushes the world further and further. Without science, we would not have any of the things that we do today, and the government needs people working on all types of science to find new things.
Even if there isn't practical use for scientific research, it should still be funded. Science is what moves us forward. Is there any practical use for a theoretical physicist? No, but a lot of their work leads to massive inventions, like the large hadron collider and the warp drive currently being designed by NASA (no, I'm not making that up.
The governments of many places do not have the money to support frivolous spending which is what scientific research is. People are just researching so that we can research so why is it necessary that we waste money for the sake of wasting money. This, I feel, also is completely irrelevant in people's future because the amount of people who actually end up using it is so miniscule that it is completely stupid to support scientific learning.
If it has no practical value, you're just wasting the government's money, tax. It costs a lot to conduct scientific research and we benifit from nothing, it's just waste of our money. The government should use tax in ways that citizens who pay tax can benefit, not useless sceintists. :D
Government research funding should only be available to scientific endeavors that can yield practical results. The people's money is too scarce to be wasted on speculation and wild goose chases. The people will only support research that can bring about tangible results. If universities and researchers want to pursue impractical research, they should have to fund it themselves.
Our government should definitely not support scientific research unless there is a worthwhile practical use for it. If scientific research is being conducted just for the sake of doing research, then the scientists involved need to find funding someplace else. The government already has more than enough frivolous endeavors that it currently supports.