Yes, the group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals should be limited in its investigations, because they make a lot of demands that are simply not practical. One such demand was when they wanted Ben & Jerrys to serve ice cream made with human breast milk. PETA should know their limits, because at some point, they're harassing people.
I believe the group, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), should be limited to its investigations. I believe they should have to follow the laws, just as any individual should have to follow the laws. Their investigations shouldn't allow them onto private property or allow them access to information that is not granted to them.
Naturally, the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals is entitled to go about trying to protect them, but it should not be carried to extremes without being subject to legal action. One can say one does not appreciate the actions of another, but treating the other person disrespectfully--for wearing fur for instance--should be treated as assault.
No, the group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) should not be limited in its investigations. They have the same right as any other group or individual in the United States, and limiting them because we don't like their message would be a violation of their First Amendment rights.
The group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) should not be limited in its investigations. They are the one group out there that do everything that they can to help the animals. I think that we should give them whatever they need to do their job and rescue the animals in need.