Amazon.com Widgets
  • Information should be freely exchanged and only criminals should be restrained

    The internet functions best when it is free. When information is freely shared,
    new and useful ideas multiply in the exchange. So censoring the internet
    would be wrong. However, the internet should be closely monitored.
    Communications that concern smuggling, terrorism, slavery, child abuse or
    environmental destruction should be tracked, and the people who send them
    should be investigated. Numerous crimes could be prevented this way, and
    should be. Information should be free, but criminals should not.

  • The internet should be censored.

    There are certain cases when the Internet should be censored. If the Internet is being used to aid illegal activities such as drug dealing or money laundering, the government should move in to stop these activities. The police should also stop websites that seek to aid terrorists or messages of hate.

  • Yes, the Internet needs censorship.

    It would be good if there were more limits to what could appear on the Internet. There's too much freedom on the Internet, and it brings unsafe content, that would have never been in homes before, right into the home, and even readily accessible to children. There should be a lot more safeguards to help keep people from seeing materials they don't want to see. A lot of people have accidentally, for example, seen porn by clicking on a website that seemed innocent.

  • The worst thing about censorship is _____

    The internet is the main method of human communication now, and thus it needs to be free. If we allow the internet to be censored, then human communication will evolve down a very uncomfortable and disturbing path, but the ones who wish to censor human communication already know that and like that.

  • No censorship on the Internet

    The Internet is practically its own sovereign territory. The second things are censored from the Internet entirely, it starts to become an unnecessarily complicated political matter. Regardless, there should be no point in censoring anything - server hosts should take action against harmful things like child pornography, but that is pretty much the only exception.

  • No, information should be freely exchanged and only criminals should be restrained



    The internet functions best when it is free. When information is freely shared,
    new and useful ideas multiply in the exchange. So censoring the internet
    would be wrong. However, the internet should be closely monitored.
    Communications that concern smuggling, terrorism, slavery, child abuse or
    environmental destruction should be tracked, and the people who send them
    should be investigated. Numerous crimes could be prevented this way, and
    should be. Information should be free, but criminals should not.


  • It should not.

    The Internet should not be censored. There is this thing called freedom of speech, and if you censor the Internet then you are infringing on peoples right to free speech. If people do not want to see the bad things on the Internet then they can avoid it at all costs.

  • No, it is a good place for freedom.

    No, the internet should not be censored, because the internet is a good place to find freedom. On the internet, a person does not have to look at something they do not want to. They do not have to read something they do not want to read. There is no reason for censorship, other than political control. It should not be allowed.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.