I have always liked exploring places and seeing new things. In this way borders make little sense to me at all as I like to ask why can I not visit there (I understand other peoples houses are different).
It is also unlikely that we could kick everyone out forever. Like the Mongolians and the Great Wall, if people are determined enough they find a way. Lastly America was founded without true borders. People really could just show up and be considered Americans. The borders have been drawn through war and bloodshed. Explain to me why we need to keep every last Canadian out. What makes the so different and what would be so bad if we created some North American system that allowed people from the US, Mexico, and Canada from traveling freely between each country. That is the main question.
Think of what we could save by opening the borders! Not only the costs of militarizing the border, and hiring guards, but the cost to the border economies on both sides caused by hours of delay in crossing the border. The cost of border militarization could be redirected to education, economic development, creating a vibrant North American Union that would provide true security for our children and grandchildren. Let us return to the state border friendship envisioned when Pat Nixon opened Friendship Park celebrating what we can do if we bring together the communities in Tijuana and San Diego.
America was founded on immigration. Immigration is the cornerstone of the American lifestyle! We must encourage immigration, not run people out of the country on a rail! The more immigrants we have the more diverse our society will become! And diversity is always to our advantage in the long run!
This is the easiest way to expand the income of people in the country. There is no better way for corporations to continue to have record profits than by expanding the pool of cheap labor. Corporate profits = bigger dividends for stock holders = YAY me! I definitely support open borders.
Until some racists decided we were being overrun by the Chinese there was never any restrictions on entering the United States, today we're in a situation where we need a growing population of younger people who are working and contributing to the system. Having an open border would allow anyone who could make it here would have a chance to make it here, this is the concept the country was founded on, anyone who disagrees or thinks otherwise needs to research history.
An open border policy for migrants would work only if the country bordering the United States has similar policies and standards as America. Having a free-flowing immigration system with Mexico would be great, but only if the drug violence subsides. There are too many people coming from Mexico illegally already. An open policy would prevent more illegals from coming over since most everyone would be in the United States legally. However, drugs may become a bigger problem since drug cartels control large portions of the Mexican border with the USA.
The reason for this headline is for me to understand how United States citizens have more freedom to travel through the Americas but for the rest of Americans like Central America and South America , people have to obtain a visa knowing we all from the continent of America, just look at the map! Big companies are moving to other part of America ie: Central America and South America , we are all Americans (united in land mass) and just because your United States citizens doesn't make you perfect, look at Puerto Rico they have they own flag and they have more freedom to the USA then those that are living in America and I mean ALL of America! We are one continent, yet separated by hate, greed and power aka: governments and banks. Remember humanity and we all bleed red! And under God we are all one! Please respond I would love to hear and understand more about this subject!
We should have open borders, but if they do it should come with a strict set of policies. I say that because it would limit the amount of illegal drugs and maybe even terrorists in the United States. Also because it would allow easy access to outside of the "borders".
See this article in The Atlantic: http://www.Theatlantic.Com/international/archive/2013/04/if-people-could-immigrate-anywhere-would-poverty-be-eliminated/275332/
"Though he generally disagrees with the standard arguments against increased immigration (that immigrants take jobs from native workers, increase crime, take more out of the system in welfare than they put back in taxes, and hurt their countries of origin due to so-called "brain drain"), Caplan understands that some developed-world workers could see a minor decrease in real pay. But whatever downsides there may be, he wrote in a 2011 post, "the upside of open borders would be the rapid elimination of absolute poverty on earth."
Reduce/eliminate world poverty. There are enormous income gaps between nations, with some countries enjoying per capita incomes over 100 times greater than other countries. Most of the world's dire poverty is located in the poorest countries, and migrants who move to rich countries see rapid increases in their earnings. Often they benefit those who stay behind as well, through return migration (with skills and capital) or remittances. Economists have estimated that open borders would double world GDP, and these enormous income gains would go disproportionately to the poorest.
Grow the US economy. Immigrants are disproportionately entrepreneurial, and because of basic supply and demand will be likely to fill gaps in the existing job market. They can reduce the wages of some workers but probably raise the wages of natives overall, through the complementarities of native and foreign labor, and their impact on land prices is unambiguously positive, creating windfalls for homeowners without making suburban homes more expensive for natives, since it is always possible to convert more rural land (there's plenty) into suburban housing developments. Indeed, they might make housing cheaper by lowering building costs. Debt per capita is necessarily reduced by immigration, and since immigrants are disproportionately young and often have higher birthrates than natives, they help to solve the long-run problem of population aging bankrupting the Social Security and Medicare systems.
Human rights. Open borders would aid human rights in many ways. For one thing, people could escape from regimes that grievously violate human rights. This already happens and asylum programs are supposed to accommodate it, but they tend to be nightmarishly hard to navigate simply because there is such a powerful incentive for merely economic migrants to use them. Undocumented immigrants, though they made the choice to come and are presumably better than at home on average, face the constant threat of deportation and often of forced separation of family members. The 1986 amnesty tried to deal with this, as, hopefully, will another amnesty this year, but the underlying problem remains, namely, that there is an incentive to come here illegally, and the creation of mixed-status families naturally follows. The only way to escape this problem is to have open borders.
There is no way we can open the borders to any migrants. It is okay if they go through the whole process of becoming a legal citizen. We have too many illegal people that come here and waste tax dollars because they have not had the respect to become a legal citizen.
No, I don't believe the U.S. should have an open border policy for migrants. The U.S. already has a problem with too many people trying to cross the border illegally, that to allow migrants to cross the border would only compound the problem further. the U.S. should adopt an immigration policy like Dubai, where nobody is allowed to move in permanently, only temporary workers.
The drugs that would flow into the US would be a real problem. And it isn't going to stop anytime soon. We need to secure our borders from these people who just want to exploit our country. I say America for Americans. Liberals save your "native American" talk, yes my family did come from Europe here and they became citizens why can't you say that about Mexicans or any other Latin/south American who wants to enter the US. I was born here this is our country not theirs. America only for Americans!
This is the USA. We need to protect out own first. That means making sure Americans have jobs, homes, health care etc. We take better care of foreigners than we do of our own people! Having an open border will only increase this disparity. Also, no sane country on this planet would have an open border! Think about all the crime, drugs, prostitution, and let's not forget the ongoing terrorism issue. It would be a recipe for disaster.
I don't think so, because it could bring in diseased people that can spread illness all around. It could also bring in violence and terrorism. I personally think that the States would be over crowded. It would also be hard for immigrants to get jobs in the USA, and there wouldn't be enough money in the budget for them all to receive public assistance.
Look what happened to England because of it's immigration policy. Things will not end well for the City of London, which is now a minority English city. Culture and traditions are important, which is why immigration policy should look closely at people who come in - will they support our free society or make it less free? The United States' current policy does not do this.
The idea of a completely open border policy would place too much of a burden on society as it tries to cope with a massive influx of people. We are still recovering economically and trying to build some social unity in this country. We should consider reforms such as registered guest worker programs in which workers get cards and pay taxes on the income they earn, and we should consider paths to citizenship for existing people who came here illegally. But completely open borders is just a recipe for chaos and confusion at a time when out current resources are stretched too thin.
The United States, as with any country, has a right and a responsibility to control who enters its territory. While there are certainly many people who wish to enter the US for work, there are also many with more nefarious reasons, such as organized crime and terrorism. It is only natural that the US check who enters, to make sure those coming are there for the right reasons, and not to harm its citizens.
Why do we not see open borders adopted by other countries? Because policy makers realize that open borders will bring chaos and uncertainty. As long as this world has the construct of sovereign countries, open borders will never be adopted, at least not by those countries who have a semblance of economic prosperity.
It's unfair to the immigrants who plan to stay here and make a life here, rather than just people coming in. I think the immigration policy should be made easier, but just saying, "I'm done! Let's just let everyone in!" isn't going to help. Drug trafficking, kidnapping, and overall crime rate would increase because anyone can cross. Also, it wouldn't help people struggling with human rights issues in their home countries, as they could simply be kidnapped and brought back. Look at North Korea. Solders cross into China and kidnap defectors. They even cross into South Korea. Want this to happen? No.