Amazon.com Widgets

Should the U.S. implement a mandatory living wage?

  • There should be a living wage.

    Everyone should be able to provide for themselves and not be forced to live in poverty, especially in a country with the government and resources that the United States has to offer. In order to reduce poverty and encourage economic growth as a leading nation, the United States should have a living wage.

  • It's just time

    The US has gotten to the point where scientifically it is possible to figure out what people need to make to survive, and it makes sense to standardize this for business owners to use when deciding what minimum wage is. If the business is not fit to pay it's workers a just compensation, they have no business hiring them in the first place.

  • Yes, the US should.

    This is a very important step in the correct direction. If and when a mandatory living wage policy is passed, everyone would be able to afford food, gas, housing, and other expenses. And when you have money like this being handed back into the economy and taxed, it's great for the country as a whole.

  • It would cause inflation.

    No, the U.S. should not implement a mandatory living wage, because all it would do is raise inflation. As people have to be paid more, they all have more to spend. The result of that is that demand goes up. As demand goes up, so do prices. Mandatory wage hikes do not fix the problem.

  • No, Living wage will reduce employment

    There is a critical point in the discussion of whether living wages help poor and low-income families that bears emphasizing. Standard economic theory predicts that a mandated wage floor like a living wage will reduce employment. However, how a mandated wage floor affects the distribution of income, and poor families in particular, is purely an empirical question. One can be absolutely convinced, from the theory or, preferably, the evidence, that living wages reduce employment


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.