Older women are poor for a reason. They got paid way less than men. They were shoved aside so that 'the boys' of the era got to thrive. Women of baby boom era and below are the ones affected. Most were treated horribly, and still are. The US is being a cheapskate by not making amends to these older women for the way they have always been treated. Only the women who came from well off families got anywhere, the poor ones had to scrounge for anything they could and still are.
I think that I will be forever amazed and disheartened by the continuing perception of the poor as products of their own actions. Many are the product of challenges that run the gamut from personal choice, social & economic community resources, and educational and income opportunities .. .Or the lack of.
The Government needs to stop providing "aide" in the form of mortgages, loans and tax breaks (all relatively useless to the poor and homeless) and start providing homes, food and services. The current system primarily serves banks, bureaucrats, and politicians. We are the richest country in the world. There should be no involuntary homelessness - period.
People deserve support. Our government is there to help people and provide the highest quality life possible to all the citizens. Furthermore, it is important the these social services exist as they enable, on the whole, our society to be more productive. Education, health care, and much more are simple human rights.
It's only fair that we look out for the less privelaged. We seem to be blinded by the richesse lifestyle or mediocre lifestyle even, that we remain oblivious to the real problems in society. The government should spend money on useful things as mentioned above, rather than create wars/kill civilians in different countries..
The us gov needs to help poor people live with rights and a good society so they can live and live right even fought Obama makes really good decisions and I know he will help a lot so help the poor in the USA . Go for it USA .
We need to help the poor out because what if you were the "poor" person. God forbid that but try to put yourself in that persons shoes. Not every one is born in a good family. Just because u are born in one doesnt mean that u cant help out the ones who arent born in a good family/ environment. Half the kids in the bad parts of the world are dying. We need to step up our game and try to help. The poor people are also humans they also have dreams of getting a higher education and living life the way we all do.
We spend so much money on some other ridiculous things that we forget that they are other people that are sleeping on a bench or under a bridge. Space exploration receives enough money to get half of the people in need some help or a shelter to provide them some kind of a place where they can call it home.
Without my dads medicare I wouldn't be able to get my insulin I would die. Though I think there should be more regulations so stupid people do not abuse it. Like drug testing and making sure their getting things to support living not I phones. That's my opinion. Thank you
Our Vote counted and we've done our part going out to polls, believing in the United States Of America, that is part of this whole "America We Stand" so why shouldn't we be supported , we the people stood in line to vote for campaign leaders so be there for people. There are so many Americans that have worked hard for our United States to have kept this country so beautiful and let us not forget the people when their in need and hardship. Support them and look around our country you governors of or support system and do the right thing for our people.
I absolutely believe that the elderly, children, and the disabled should receive government assistance. These people are not physically capable of taking care of themselves or providing for themselves. However, I cannot say how many times I have witnessed the abuse of these funds by the people receiving them. If people are well enough to volunteer, they are well enough to find a job. The job they find may not be glamorous, but it is a start. If that is what it takes to get them out of poverty then they should take responsibility for themselves. I have seen billboards for large companies that are trying to find workers. The problem being that the people who apply cannot pass the drug tests requred to receive a job. This is not the fault of the government, it is that of the individual who made the choice to take the drugs. It is the role of the government to provide for the people who cannot provide for themselves, not to continue to support those who choose not to. By giving these people more money we are not helping them to get out of poverty. Why look for another job when you are getting free money? We should not cut back on these funds, but we absolutely should not increase them. We need to be much more strict in the monitoring of the money we are handing out. Drug tests should be administered to each person who is receiving the money, maybe that will provide them with some initiative to get a job.
Creates more dependency on the rich, allowing the poor to do less and less now they know they don't need to work. The majority of the poor serve as parasites to democracy, allowing for politicians to feed more and more welfare to the least productive sector of society. As a result, Why can't the most productive sector receive tax breaks for all the jobs they helped create through their "greedy"actions?
Some people go into poverty because they messed up in life. Drug abuse, alcohol abuse, teen pregnancy, gambling, etc. I'm doing research on this for a school essay, and more than half the people who are in poverty now are in poverty because of something stupid they did. Hence, I don't think government should provide any more support for people in poverty. What they have now is enough. No more, no less.
"For even when we were with you, we would give you this command: if anyone is not willing to work, let him not eat." 2 Thessalonians 3:10
If the poor want to have a better life, they should work harder to advanced their position in life. A society doesn't run on everyone having the same standard of living. It isn't the governments job to steal from the rich, who have worked hard for their wealth, and give to those unwilling to work.
We already have welfare and social services, why do we need to increase it? The people who receive welfare and other social services are typically free from government aid after two years. This shows us that it works! There is no logical reason to change something that is not broken.
The further we move away from the natural order of survival of the fittest, the faster we will implode and turn to anarchy.
I hate to say it, but life's not fair. If you can't figure out how to bring your own worth to the table, then what's the point.
If a family or community chooses to help some one of less fortune, then that is great. I'm all for it. But this burden shouldn't be put onto other people just because the government says so.
I'm disgusted by how people are these days.
Why do we have to give are hard EARNED money to the people we all know can get a job, and pay for things themselves. Instead of living off the government all their lives! People take advantage of the social services all the time. And I do not think that it's right. We are just wasting our (tax) money on people who can take care of themselves instead of us taking care/helping them!
Why should the goverment give our hard earned tax money to those who chose to live that way? I mean I would like for my money to go into paying the military. Not lazy people. Who spend their money on drugs and such. The goverment is supose to protect us.. Not wast our money.
Over half a trillion was spent each of the last few years on means-tested programs. This put a huge strain on the country and is unfair to those paying federal tax. Individuals need to be held responsible for their own action rather than being rewarded on their irresponsibility. (Yes, getting gov't handouts rewards as they are money you didn't earn.)
I am for assisting kids that lost parents, elderly, and physically/mentally disabled. But for helping those that couldn't pull themselves together and actually get an education to make anything is wrong and if they are too lazy or aren't able to get their own food, then why should people who actually worked for their money, house, food, job, and education give their hard earned money to those who couldn't do anything because they felt that the government owed them their luxury to do nothing and have others pay for their bidding. I also believe that if middle class can barely afford getting new cars such as a Nissan Altima or a Ford Focus or some car like that, then how come poor class american citizens can drive around brand new BMW's and M3's. That's nowhere close to being right.