Should violent juveniles be treated as adults in court?
Yes
Because they have committed the same crime. And also if they are even 5 years old, they need to be punished for the crime they've committed, because if they get away with it, it will become a habit that they carry on till later life. Definitely they should.
Posted by: AnonymousAbsolutely
Yes, children who commit serious crimes should be tried as an adult. I am in a situation now where a juvenile has committed a crime against my child, and they are wanting to try the juvenile as a kid and try to "rehabilitate" him instead of punishing him for what he did. While I do agree this juvenile needs serious mental help, he also needs to be punished for what he has done. So yes, juveniles that commit a serious crime should be tried as an adult.
Posted by: AnonymousKill rely Kills
I am old enough to know that committing a crime is wrong and that if I commit one, I will be punished. Anyone who says teens can't tell right from wrong is either too old to remember what being a teenager is like or they are a teenager who has committed a crime and don't want to be tried as an adult. In either case, they are wrong. All teens know that killing is wrong, yet they do it anyway and get away with a light sentence because of their age. Even if a teen didn't know it was wrong, it doesn't mean it's right. They should still be punished. If they aren't, they willthink that crimes are okay and continue to commit them.
Teens today don't fear the law because they don't think they will get caught. And if they do, they know they have a good chance of getting off because they are tried as teens and not adults. We have to get tougher on crime. There should be a law that everyone over eleven years old will be tried as adults. That way more teens would be discouraged from committing crimes. They would know that murder would get them a very long sentence instead of staying in juvenile hall until they are eighteen.Posted by: AnonymousYes, because I have a brother who robbed our family's own home.
I have a brother who has stood in front of the judge more than three times, all because he broke into our family's home. The judge blamed my mother and father instead of blaming my brother. It's only a matter of time before he takes somebody life or somebody takes his.
Posted by: QuaTashaAccountability is a positive thing!
The sooner a child is held accountable for their actions, the sooner they will learn that there are consequences for their actions. That is a positive thing. If they did not receive this understanding in their upbringing, than why not give it to them the moment they commit a crime. That is the best gift they can receive. The sooner the better while their minds are still developing.
Posted by: AnonymousI do believe young kids that comitted serious crime have to be tried as adults
It's this simple. For example, murder. When kids murder, it is obvious that they lost their innocence. So for having a child be tried on court as an adult, it doesn't really make a difference on them doing their crime. It means that they're already NOT innocent for people to have pity on them because they're gonna be tried as an adult.
Posted by: TheDebateProYes they should learn the consequences and parents should raise them right.
I think that, if for instance a 15 year old killed another 15 year old, then they should serve the time. If you understand the difference between right and wrong, and you blatantly went against it, then they should be tried as an adult. If adults have to go to jail for killing or committing violent crimes, then they should too, after all, they are going to grow up to be an adult. Unless the teen has a mental disability and they don't understand that what they did was wrong.
They need to understand that you can't get away with everything, but this all still goes back to the parents. If the parents of today actually start being parents and stop letting TVs and video games etc. raise their kids, then we wouldn't have all this to begin with. Parents, the Bible says "train up a child in the way he should go and when he is old he will not turn away from them." If parents neglect to raise their kids properly then how do they expect them to act in the future?Posted by: Smells2014YES they should get tried as an adult
If they do not get punished now for what they have done they will always think it is right not wrong. My cousin got put in prison at the age of 14 for being involved in a murder. He is out now and doing better stuff than out with gangs and drugs. Thanks to being arrested for something he did that was wrong.
Posted by: AnonymousKnowledge of "Right" or "Wrong"
Children should be tried as adults starting at a certain age. Right around age 10-12 is when I began to really think to myself, "What will the consequences be if I do this?" before I did something. That is the age where most children began to really know right and wrong, not to mention the difference. But this is no fine line, my friends. Sometimes, a crime will be commited because of an unhealthy lifestyle, or maybe insufficient mentoring from a parent. many crimes comitted by boys ages 12-18 are suspected to be heavily influenced by the convict having no father. This is the fine line. Just bad behavior, or growing up without proper nutrition, educationally? More often than not, however, The child who commited the crime knew what he/she was doing, and did it anyways. They knew it was wrong, they still did it. They even knew the consequences, in most cases, and STILL they did it. If we give children adult sentences, other children seeing this on TV or another form of communication will say "Hey, I was going to do this, But this kid did it, and he's in jail! I don't think I wanna do this anymore!" Giving full adult sentences to children who commited the crime and knew what they were doing will teach them as well as others. This is the only way to rid of teen criminals.
Posted by: AnonymousYes Absolutely
Absolutely. First of all, the question said "Serious Crimes." Juveniles of a certain age should absolutely be tried as adults for their crimes, especially if those crimes are of a violent nature. Children learn at a very young age what is right and what is wrong, and the consequences of their actions. Justifying deliberate and intentional violence with an absurd argument that the individual did not "know" any better is a crime in and of itself. If they commit adult crimes they should be tried as adults. They know what they are doing is wrong, so why should they not be punished if they are just under 18. What's the difference between a 17 year old murdering someone and an 18 year old? Nothing they know its wrong.
Posted by: AnonymousYes, They should.
People know right from wrong, minor or not. If a minor commits a violent crime, they know that what they're doing is bad and they should be punished for it correctly. If they only get a child slap-on-the-wrist consequence they'll think that it's okay to do it again and most likely again thereafter.
Posted by: AnonymousOf course!
I think violent juveniles be charged as adults because they SHOULD MOST DEFINITELY know right from wrong. Every youth should know that violence never solves/helps and is never a good thing. Is it any different if a 17 year old murders someone than a 18 year old murdering someone??? Absolutely not!
Posted by: AnonymousYes or course
Juveniles that commit adult crimes are given juvenile sentences? Where is the logic here? Be it adults or juveniles, once they commit serious crimes like grievously injuring someone, murder, rape, they should be given a sentence that suits the crime committed, not whether if that person is adult or juvenile. You may argue that juveniles may suffer "peer pressure" and "do not know what they are doing", they actually have a strong sense of right and wrong. Even a 5 year old child knows that murdering someone is a wrong thing to do, be it teenagers?
As a famous quote once mentioned, "If you don't want to go to hell, you should have thought twice before having your first bite of meat!"Posted by: AnonymousViolent juveniles should be treated as adults in court.
I think violent juveniles should be treated as adults in court because they should know the consequences when they chose to commit a serious crime. They are in control of their actions and they know this action is violent. If they know their action is violent, they should know they consequences of their actions. It is their fault they chose to murder a innocent person in this world , so why should they get away without being charged of murder? Murder is a serious crime and if you kill a person you need jail time instead of picking up trash.
Posted by: AnonymousYes, what's the difference?
Past a certain age, I don't know, 10? I'm pretty sure we definitely know right from wrong. It should never be excusable for someone to commit a violent crime and get a sentence that is too lenient. As it is, our law system often gives adult criminal around a 2/3 off their sentence for various pleas, bargains, etc. It would be adding insult to injury to excuse someone because they are 'too young'. If at 14 you can get drunk every weekend, smoke, and take recreational drugs, why shouldn't you be treated as an adult? You might say nobody that young does those things, but trust me, I met a lot of people that did, even younger as well. And I went to a good school.
Posted by: AnonymousYES
Juveniles of a certain age should absolutely be tried as adults for their crimes, especially if those crimes are of a violent nature. Children learn at a very young age what is right and what is wrong, and the consequences of their actions. Justifying deliberate and intentional violence with an absurd argument that the individual did not "know" any better is a crime in and of itself.
Posted by: AnonymousOf course they should.
They should because they have control over their own mind. No one else controls them. If they decide to do it, that was him. He could change his mind, but he choose not to. That is my opinion, we all have our own. The constitution even says we should all be treated equally, Therefore, whatever an adult is sentenced, so should teens.
Posted by: AnonymousI think some violent juveniles should be treated as adults, depending on their age and the severity of their crimes.
I do not see any reason why a 17-year old should not be treated the same way as an 18-year old, if they are a repeat violent offender. On the other hand, I do think that courts should consider other factors, like the severity of the crime, the juvenile's previous criminal record and their upbringing, before determining if they should be tried as an adult.
Posted by: ToughEfrain26If they were Adult enough to do the Crime, they're old Enough to Pay the Price.
They should be held accountable for their actions. If the system is lenient on them, they will think that they can get away with a serious crime, and could do it again in the future. Even though they're juveniles, if they could commit a crime that an adult could do, they should be punished like an adult.
Posted by: AnonymousYes, I do believe that juveniles should be treated as adults.
Kids should be treated as adults would in court for the crimes they commit. They will never learn the difference between right and wrong if they are not properly punished. Also other kids who might be planning to do violent crimes will rethink their actions before doing it if they know what will happen to them if they follow through with their plan. To add on, no matter who did the crime, the outcome of their actions still has an impact on another persons life. The person they hurt or the family that is suffering will not forget the pain they had went through. That's why children who commit violent crimes should be tried as adults would in the court.
Posted by: AnonymousI think violent juveniles should be treated as adults in court.
That is because that would encourage better conduct by juveniles. If juveniles know they will get severely punished for violent crimes they won't commit them. Some juveniles may even take advantage of the current system knowing they will not get severely punished. If a juvenile murdered another juvenile they should be punished severely for there actions! If a violent juvenile only had to do community service, wouldn't that make some juveniles think they can get away with murder? How can you punish a juvenile who has taken someone's life with picking up trash? We need to push for tougher laws so juveniles don't get off easy.
Posted by: AnonymousYes
Yes
Some people are habitual offenders that keep repeating more hideous crimes with each sentence they do in jail. Kids now a days believe they are invincible and that they will not get in trouble. If I did half the stuff these kids pulled today I would be sitting gently that is the problem, we don't discipline our children enough I always knew right from wrong and hurting and killing people is wrong. They lack a conscience some people are just born bad.Posted by: AnonymousHold juveniles accountable, just as an adult.
I believe that kids should be charged as criminals when they commit a crime. My whole life I have seen kids get away with things, including beating up other kids at school, on the way to or from school, and in the neighborhood. By slapping these kids with criminal charges when they do something wrong, especially when it hurt/harms a person, or damages/destroys property, we would be sending a message that this won't be tolerated and that there will be consequences, not by letting them get off scott free. It is no longer sufficient to allow the parents to handle the situation when there kids are out of line. Most of the time the parents are not hard enough in giving a punishment, or they do not see the severity of the actions that their child(ren) has done. They need to be held accountable for their actions, no matter what the original intent was. Once something is carried out too far, there is no undoing it. If we file and press charges against kids who do harmful acts to people or property, it should be that it will serve as a "scare" tactic for when they are breaking the law. If we go too lightly on such kids, they won't care and will keep going back to the same bad acts. A slap on the wrist is not effective at all.
Posted by: Rocket91Face up to your crimes
If they think that they're old enough to commit crimes like adults, they shouldn't be afraid to take responsibility and be tried and punished as adults. It just depends on the degree and severity of the crimes committed. They are young criminals and that was their choice not anyone else's.
Posted by: AnonymousI say yes.
If a juvenile commits a felony, for example, a murder, their punishment is community service. It is not very fair, child or not. And if they are not found guilty for a felony, it might influence them to do it again because they got away with it. Juveniles should also know their rights from wrongs, should they not? I believe that age should not matter, and that intent should count. As sad as it is to see a juvenile pleading to be freed, it is only fair to judge them by what they did, not how old they are.
Posted by: AnonymousIts about intent
It seems to me that the intent of the crime should be more heavily scrutinized by the law. Violent teens and young adults who commit serious crimes with the intent against innocent people should undoubtedly be handed down maximum adult penalties.
As the general public isn't privy to data surrounding the success of the Juvenile justice system one could only imagine that the system along with Police and the community is not equipped to deal with youth that have no respect in the first place. Many crimes are committed as a result of circumstances, stupidity or purely accidental. I however fail to see these are treated any different to a total act of violence perpetrated against an innocent victim.
eg: A 18 year old gets into an argument which result in an altercation, he throws a punch knocks the other guy to the ground he hits his head and dies gets the maximum 3 year Juvenile sentence. Another 19 year old walks up to a person not known to him pulls out a box cutting knife and slashes him across the face he gets 9 months in Juvenile system, that to me makes no sense.
Yes they both need to be subject to consequences but once again its about intent.
These juveniles know right from wrong however our laws and mollycoddling by all the do gooders are creating a society with no respect and no fear of consequences, sentencing them as adults may make no difference whatsoever to the crime rate however it may give some of the more vulnerable within the Juvenile system an opportunity to make the most of it.Posted by: AnonymousYes, I think violent juveniles should be judged as adults.
I think that juveniles should face the adult punishment. I don't necessarily think that they should have a death penalty, but I do think they should have five years in prison. These juveniles need to be responsible for there actions. The severe punishment would teach them to be disciplined so they won't do it again.
Posted by: AnonymousYes, they should be tried as an adult
They should be tried as an adult because when you have the mentality to commit a crime such as murder you have the mentality of knowing what you are doing, except in the case of pleading insane. I feel everyone over the age of 11 should know what they are doing if they are violent, and if they don't their parents should put them in an anger management class.
Posted by: AnonymousYes they should.
They have committed adult crimes and deserve no better than an adult. They ought to know what is coming to them in court when they commit such a bad crime. Some kids commit first degree murder and are tried too justly. Just because they're kids doesn't mean they haven't killed someone.
Posted by: AnonymousYES THEY SHOULD
Because the youngsters decide their aims and goals at this stage of their life and if they start like this, imagine what they will do as grown ups. Juvenile crimes should not be taken lightly as children think that they will get away with it and they will do it next time, their attitude will be "oh look, i can murder someone, no problem, the government will set me free, yay!"
Posted by: AnonymousTeens need to own up to their actions.
All people, including teens who commit a serious crime should have consequences. If teens had the ability to know what will happen after committing a crime, they should be treated like how they acted. Some teens think it's okay to break the laws, so if so, they should be okay with the consequences their actions will bring to them.
Posted by: AnonymousTreated the same
I believe no matter the crime you should be treated the same as because the crime was still committed. And a juvenile is at least the age of 12 (minnesota) and at that age you know what is right or wrong therefore you should be held accountable. I believe that if our society was more like that we would see less crime and less juveniles committing the crimes.
Posted by: AnonymousYES, juveniles should be tried as adults.
Old enough to do the crime, old enough to do the time! We have to discourage other teens by making them understand how important it is to pay for their actions. Just because a kid commits a crime does not mean that the crime is not committed, and it surely doesn’t mean that the victim didn't suffer.
Posted by: Anonymousteens should be tried as adults because no matter the brutality of the crime, they need to know that wont be okay in the real world
juviniles should be tried as adults because, no matter the crime or the brutality of the crime, they should still know that wont be okay in the real world.
Posted by: AnonymousYes
If you infringe upon somebody s "Life liberty and the pursuit of happiness" Then you should be tried as an adult no matter your age. if you take a life from one you should suffer the same punishment if your 15 or if your 43. Its the same crime inst it? Your age shouldn't be a deciding factor of life in prison or 6 months in a hold. You should not be un -justly punished if your 14 vs an adult its THE SAME THING! This is why i urge you to vote YES not NO!
=DPosted by: AnonymousYES!
Yes I think that if they commit adult crimes, that they should be tried as adults. They know what they are doing is wrong, so why should they not be punished if they are just under 18. What's the difference between a 17 year old murdering someone and an 18 year old? Nothing. They know its wrong.
Posted by: AnonymousDefinitely
Teens should know right from wrong. If you kill others you must know what you are getting yourself in. You know you are portected until eighteen and that should stop. Teens are not that ignorant if they don't know right from wrong their most be a problem. Justice must be served.
Posted by: AnonymousYes, they juveniles should be punished.
Yes, because if they are old enough to do the crime, then they are old enough to be treated like an adult. If juveniles continue committing crimes, then they will think that it's fine to break the laws. Teenagers know the consequences of their actions, but they still continued to kill, steal, etc. Some might say that the juvenile brain is not developed, but I think when you are around 10 years old, you might know what's right and what's wrong.
Posted by: AnonymousYes it's fair because of the violent nature of the crimes.
Yes, because no matter what age, people should know not to break the law. Treating 16/17-year-olds like juveniles just gives them another excuse to do it. All juveniles over the age of 12 should be punished for their crimes, because if they are capable of murdering, or buying and drinking alcohol illegally, they can handle the cruel punishment.
Posted by: AnonymousChild Crime, Adult Time
I believe children should be tried as adults when a serious violent crime has been committed. Also, these children should have heavy psychoanalysis to determine their ability to be rehabilitated during/after their term. I know not all child offenders are lost causes, but some people such as sociopaths will never change and that will be realized with psych evaluations.
Posted by: AnonymousAdult Crime, Adult Consequences
I will put it simply for you. If a minor, or anyone for that matter, but in this situation especially minors, and you commit an adult crime, you should get treated as adults. If you choose to take someone's life or anything of the sort that is violent, the courts should have no mercy for you. YOU chose to commit that violent crime, YOU suffer the consequences. You shouldn't be given mercy for a crime you did purposely.
Posted by: AnonymousWhy should juveniles be treated like minors when they were most capable of the doings of an adult?
A juvenile should know that what they did was wrong no matter what the circumstances are. But they commit the crime even though they know what will happen to them once they are caught. So in ways yes they should sentenced as a juvenile but other ways they should be sentenced as adults. Some minors know what they are doing is wrong, but others it is natural. It is as if they need to comet crimes so those are the minors who should be locked up like adults. Not with adults but sentenced like the adults. What I don't understand is that kids should be able to grow up and not have to worry about hurting other people.. Most of time by the time kids are the age of five they should have already been taught what's right and what's wrong. From their they should have someone showing them what they should and should not do. I blame adults,tv, toys and video games because kids do not know what they are doing so they tend to mimic what they see. When a child sees someone punching another person because it looked "fun" , they will learn to copy those moves and then try them on other minors.
Posted by: AnonymousYes, they should be punished.
Kids who commit crimes like stealing and murder need to be taught a lesson. It doesn't matter how old they are. Crimes need to be punished. They need to be tried as adults because if they are old enough to do the crime, they are old enough to do the time.
Posted by: AnonymousTeens Aren't Stupid
The fact that they are teens doesn't mean there off the hook. They are old enough to make there own decisions. If they decide to kill someone they should be tried as an adult. They are capable to harm someone they are able to take accept the consequences. Also if your child was hurt by a teen would like them to be tried like an adult.
Posted by: realtimeBorn with Morals
Every human being has that little voice in their head that tells them what is right or wrong. Unless you were to literally be born born with a retardation of the mind, this is true. When a little boy hits his sister out of jealousy or for no good reason at all, he is punished by means of a time-out or time away from pleasurable items to him or in some cases a spanking. To say that the boy did not know the difference between right and wrong seems rather ignorant. The punishment for hitting his sister is just with the offense, so a much greater offense such as armed robbery or murder just coincide with a just punishment as well. The mindset of "Oh, I can't be tried as an adult" just entices this type of behavior. It may not prove these high offense will occur, but to say there is no correlation to such findings would be unjust as well.
Posted by: AnonymousYouths who commit crimes are criminals.
They are walking our streets, living as our neighbors, and in many instances committing additional crimes. I strongly agree with Jessica Wilde when she says, “All crimes committed by juveniles should and must be treated in the same regard, it not to punish heinous acts, then to provide justice to the families of victims (Wilde 2).
Posted by: AnonymousYes they should be charged as adults
If kids are old enough to pull a trigger on someone, then they're old enough to be held responsible for their actions. If kids commit serious crimes then they need to be punished severely. If the victim doesn't get a second chance in life then why should the offender move on like nothing happened? That's just wrong. If my loved ones were victims of a heinous crime, I would want the offender to suffer through the harshest punishment ever.
Posted by: AnonymousYeah
They should be treated as adults. Because if they could commit violent things like adults they should face the consecuences like adults too. If you say think ike a mother her son doesnt want to be in jail. so your role as a mother is to guide your teenagers son into the right path and show him to face the consecuencess.
Posted by: AnonymousChildren should not be allowed to commit violent crimes.
If children do a violent crime they should have to suffer the consequences. Most children are well aware of their actions and the consequences. Just because they are underage, they should not be exempt of the law. If an adult with mental problems committed the crime, people would let him be executed. If a juvenile committed the crime, people are up in arms about it.
Posted by: AnonymousYes
Some people are habitual offenders that keep repeating more hideous crimes with each sentence they do in jail. Kids now a days believe they are invincible and that they will not get in trouble. If I did half the stuff these kids pulled today I would be sitting gently that is the problem we don't discipline our children enough I always knew right from wrong and hurting and killing people is wrong. They lack a conscience some people are just born bad.
Posted by: AnonymousViolent juveniles should be tried as adults!
Are they young kids? Yes. Are they still young to know what is right? Yes. But are they old enough for their brain to control their actions? Yes! Their brains are developed enough to control what they do outside. No violent juveniles should be excused just because, "Oh, I don't know much about all the political stuff," or "I don't know what you're talking about." Those are just stupid excuses that juveniles will use because they know that adults become weak when they say "charming words." If they are old enough know that adults get weak by their charming words, they are old enough to go through all the difficult and confusing rules and punishments. No parent wants their child to be around juveniles that has committed a serious crime. Think about the rest of the children afraid. Juveniles should strictly be punished like adult criminals. There are no excuses from now.
Posted by: haeungrace11Yes I do
I think they should because if you kill another human being, no matter how old, you should be tried with murder. Its a stupid act and it should never be taken lightly, there are a lot of young teenagers out there that have that problem. No one should have to suffer.
Posted by: AnonymousI agree juveniles should be treated as adults in court. As studies have shown, past the age of 10, if they are breaking the law, there is a good chance they will continue.
Studies have shown that children past the age of ten breaking the law will continue to do so throughout adulthood or until caught. It is a dangerous world today, and studies also show that 25% of violent crimes are committed by juveniles. I believe they would think twice if they thought punishment would be severe.
Posted by: takanaevHow many lives must we loose to save 1 percent of those who kill innocent people?
Simple, please look at the number of those killed by teenagers and the "projected number" you try to rehabilitate. Currently there is not a method of predicting the future, but you already have historical data showing that the current method is not working. Our penal systems is sending the wrong message when we let kids kill innocent people and go home with psychiatric evaluation of their childhood. We are a nation of who solves problems with patches. Let's not patch this problem, let's fix it.
Posted by: AnonymousTeens who commit violent crimes should be treated as adults.
Teens who commit violent crimes should be treated as adults because they are old enough to know that murder is not the way to solve your problems. They know about the consequences and they know it feels to loose a loved one. If you act as though you are an adult then you should take the punishment as an adult.
Posted by: AnonymousYes, I do think they should be treated as adults in court.
I think yes because these juveniles are committing serious crimes. If they are not punished correctly as they should, then they will continue to do their crimes, thinking that the punishment is not that bad. It is their choice to do this, and they should know that there are consequences for breaking the laws. Also, teens are mature enough that it is their fault for doing these things, since they are smart and and can make their own decisions. At least smart enough to know that an extremely wrong one that was done by choice can and will result in punishment. They are responsible, and if the crime they do is that serious, then they should end up with the consequences.
By the time most kids are preteens, they think about the consequences of each of their actions. This lasts them the rest of their lifetime, so if they do something, that means they have thought of the punishments. If they are willing to do a serious crime, then they have thought about all the problems that can occur, and have accepted that they are still going to go through with committing this action and hope not to be punished.Posted by: AnonymousJuveniles should know the consequences for doing the wrong thing.
Juveniles should be treated as adults in the case of a serious crime, because they have to learn their mistakes. If juveniles are not treated as adults, they will learn how to deal with complicated cases later in life. It is also a great chance for them to experience the complicated world. Serious crimes should be punished strictly. The parents are not to blame for the crimes. Students are going to do whatever their mind is telling them. By being punished, they will learn the consequences for their actions and try to avoid them.
Posted by: AnonymousDefinitely!
Age isn't really a factor in this situation, I believe that if a child kills someone, they are pretty much aware of what they are doing... If they aren't being held accountable for their crime, besides if they did it once what wouldn't stop them from doing it again? They should face the consequences of their own acts.
Posted by: uniquealbaYes, violent juveniles should be tried as adults.
Yes, I think juveniles should be treated as adults in court. If they are smart enough to commit the crime they should know the consequences. It is also the juvenile's own fault for committing a crime or wrongdoing. It is also their own fault for making poor choices which they should not have done. Finally, stealing, murdering, and fraud are crimes that teenagers should never commit and it is only a matter of time until the next violent juvenile commits a crime or takes another life.
Posted by: AnonymousYes
Kids are playing violent video games, Call of Duty, Halo, Battlefield, and they're learning behaviors, Whether they know it, or not. It is partly the parents fault, but if the kid's ~12 and up, he/she should be able to reason that killing someone is wrong. I can't understand how 14, 15, 16 year old kids saying "o, well, I play 2 much cod" You can't even spell, let alone try and play a game. You shouldn't have killed someone because they hugged your girlfriend, or boyfriend. The logic some people have make me wonder where our country is going.
Posted by: AnonymousYes
As a teenager myself most of us understand what we are doing! That isnt an excuse. Killing might be by accident, but if you deliberately kill someone you should be trialed as harsh as anyone else! Why go easy on a child who was set out to kill? Why go easy on them because they are just a "child?"
Posted by: Anonymousthey should.
Too many youths going around knowing that they will be let off. There needs to be a message telling them that they can't just bail themselves out of trouble, if teens are treated like adults they will fear to commit crimes and eventually, youths will be avoiding crime. Too many think that they will recieve easy going warnings., and be let off. Something must be done.
Posted by: AnonymousYes
Me being a teenager I know what is right and wrong. Yes some kids can do stupid things but if you deliberately kill someone or rape them why shouldn't you be treated like an adult in court. Some kids might do it again so they need a longer punishment time. On the other hand, I do think that courts should consider other factors, like how serious the crime is, the juvenile's previous criminal record and their upbringing, before determining if they should be tried as an adult.
Posted by: AnonymousYES!
I believe teens should be tried as adults because once you get to a certain age, whether or not your frontal lobe is completely developed or not, I know you must have some common sense, because I believe everyone is born with this, or at least I hope everyone is. Why would you murder or rape someone, I know you have to know somewhere in you that this is wrong. How do you think the victim feels, how do you really feel? Why are you doing this?
Posted by: lulledeyesI believe so.
I think that teens under age 18 should punished as a adult. Murder is murder and they just get away with it. It doesn't matter about your age. If the teens do something wrong or illegal they should be punished as a adult because they can make the mistake again and never learn.
Posted by: AnonymousYes, they should.
I believe they should because if they are not getting a good punishment then they will just commit the crime gain or commit a different crime. I'm pretty sure everyone older that 10 years old knows EXACTLY what they are doing. There is NO EXCUSES for the crimes they have committed!
Posted by: AnonymousYes, juveniles should be treated as adults in court.
Juveniles should be treated as adults in court because it is not fair that an adult has a bigger consequence. The age should not matter. They should know what is right and wrong. If juveniles can perform a murder or a theft, they should be old enough to be tried as an adult. Juveniles need to face the consequences of their actions.
Posted by: AnonymousYeses they should!!!
If they are old enough to hit puberty then heck yeah they need to be treated and punished as an adult, they are becoming a man or woman anyways... Treat 'em like it!! I knew right and wrong from the 5th grade on.. Shouldn't these little minors too?? Come on, if they commit violence then punish them as an adult!
Posted by: AnonymousI believe that juveniles should be treated as an adult.
If two juveniles [one 17 one 18 ] do a crime that would put an adult in jail, only the 18 year old would be put in jail, and the 17 year old would get in less trouble, for the same crime. So Juveniles can do what ever they want and not get in big trouble if they are less than 18. That is why I think juveniles should get the same consequences as adults.
Posted by: AnonymousYes of course
If you know how to kill than you should be tried as an adult no matter what the age is. They knew what they was doing and if you send them to rehab what can that solve? Just another reason to give them a second chance. What about the person that is dead? Does he get his life back in rehab? Killing is killing and should be responible for it.
Posted by: AnonymousYes juveniles should be tried as adults.
Imagine if a juvenile killed one of your relatives, siblings, parents, or friends' wouldn't you want them to be punished? If there are no consequences, they will not learn their lesson. Next thing you know, he will have killed someone else. They will keep committing crimes because they think they will get away with another crime. If they are tried as adults, they will learn their lesson and stop committing crimes.
Posted by: Anonymousmost definetly
if they kill, they know what they're doing young or not and they do have it set in their mind to do wrong than why call them a child ? WRONG IS WRONG ! if they committed something that bad then they know whats going on, everyday violence is not healthy for the child they learn quickly and sometimes do not care what happens to them.
Posted by: smileyViolent juveniles should be tried as adults!
Are they young kids? Yes. Are they still young to know what is right? Yes. But are they old enough for their brain to control their actions? Yes! Their brains are developed enough to control what they do outside. No violent juveniles should be excused just because, "Oh, I don't know much about all the political stuff," or "I don't know what you're talking about." Those are just stupid excuses that juveniles will use because they know that adults become weak when they say "charming words." If they are old enough know that adults get weak by their charming words, they are old enough to go through all the difficult and confusing rules and punishments. No parent wants their child to be around juveniles that has committed a serious crime. Think about the rest of the children afraid. Juveniles should strictly be punished like adult criminals. There are no excuses from now.
Posted by: AnonymousDo the crime, do the time.
Juveniles should be responsible for their actions. Everyone should be treated the same. If juveniles were punished for their actions, they might think twice for before they do something they will regret. Why should we let juveniles get away with this? If we keep treating them like this they will never learn.
Posted by: AnonymousYes, they should.
Yes, I believe that they should be treated the same as adults. If these kids are not punished this way, they will grow up to be criminals. They will not treat the consequences of breaking the law seriously unless they are given serious punishment no matter what age they are.
Posted by: AnonymousYes, I think they should be punished.
I think they should be punished for their actions because if they do not go to jail then they will think it is all right to kill someone but it is not. So they should be punished. Maybe if they don't go to jail then they can kill more people and then that will be bad so punish them. They are accused of their crimes.
Posted by: AnonymousI am a teen and I believe so.
When a child kills, does he instantly become an adult? Or does he maintain some trappings of childhood, despite the gravity of his actions?
These are the questions plaguing the American legal system today, as the violent acts of juvenile offenders continue to make headlines.
Wednesday, 14-year-old Nathaniel Brazill was found guilty of second-degree murder for killing his English teacher last year. The charge usually carries a prison term of up to 30 years, but Brazill's defense team is hopeful the sentencing judge will be more lenient in this case. They have a powerful ally: Jeb Bush. "There is a different standard for children," the governor said after Brazill was sentenced. "There should be some sensitivity that a 14-year-old is not a little adult."
In March, another Florida jury sentenced 14-year-old Lionel Tate, who killed a younger girl while practicing wrestling moves on her, to life in prison without parole. The concurrent Brazill and Tate trials served to heighten the public misconception that juvenile violent crime is on the rise; in fact, recent figures show a precipitous drop over the last five years.
Are we seeing a drop because children are thinking more carefully about their crimes, knowing they could receive adult sentences? All but five states allow children of any age charged with murder to be tried as adults. The death penalty generally isn't an option — at least not for defendants under the age of 16; The U. S. Supreme Court has ruled capital punishment unconstitutional for anyone who hasn't celebrated their 16th birthday. Some states, however, will consider 16- and 17-year-olds for the death penalty.
Or are there other factors? Defense attorneys might offer a different argument: Since the bulk of the drop-off in juvenile crime predates most states' embrace of harsher penalties for young offenders, it is disingenuous to assume any connection between the two.
The fundamental question is, are children capable of understanding the consequences of their actions? Maybe not; recent studies suggest that the brain's prefrontal lobe, which some scientists speculate plays a crucial role in inhibiting inappropriate behavior, may not reach full development until age 20.
It's unlikely that America's thirst for vengeance will be sated by scientific theory. We are, as a nation, very much in favor of treating child criminals as adults — a recent ABC news poll showed 55 percent of us believe the crime, not the perpetrator's age, should be the determining factor in sentencing.Posted by: AnonymousI agree juveniles should be treated as adults in court. When a juvenile demonstrates violent tendencies, it should be a factor certifying the juvenile as an adult.
The decision of whether a juvenile offender should be certified as an adult in the justice system depends on a number of factors. Along with things like age and mental ability, the violence of the act is a factor that should sway towards adult certification. Extremely violent offenders are not properly dealt with by the juvenile justice system, as it requires them to be housed with other juveniles. When a juvenile demonstrates violent tendencies, it should be a factor that pushes the juvenile towards certification as an adult.
Posted by: N3r0nKrooIThey must face the consequences of their actions.
I believe they should be tried as adults because if they do a crime like killing or sexually harassing someone, they don't deserve to be out. They deserve to go to prison. Just like they could make a decision to kill someone, they should be capable to think before they act. So yes, they do deserve to to prison, and I am not changing my mind because life is what you make it. If you decide to mess it up that's on you so deal with the consequences.
Posted by: AnonymousSenseless killings
You read almost everyday how youths kill youths for simply being in the wrong area, gang culture needs to be topped and the only way to stop this is to start treating violent youths with long prison sentences where life means life. If kids are adult enough to kill they are adult enough to pay for that crime.
Posted by: Z1mZ1mThey think they can get away with anything
If an adult commits a murder the penalty is either life in prison or the death penalty. If a juvenile does the same crime, they *may* have to sever until they are 18, and have community service for a while. So, these young thugs are getting released back into society and can still be harmful to the rest of the populous. As said in " The Ruling Class" The sissy treatment of young thugs is utterly wrong.
Posted by: AnonymousYes they should
Because if a child is willing to commit a murder despite the consequences I think they know way better than to kill someone or commit a big crime and I think that if they commit a bad enough crime they should have to do the required time. Depending on the crime of course.
Posted by: AnonymousYes!!!
I think if they get stopped at a young age, they will stop before they get older and the crimes get worse. If they see and experience the lifestyle of a criminal in jail, they will realize that they want to be more than that. If they fix there problems when they are teens they will most definently know that they are in the wrong path of life.
Posted by: AnonymousThey committed the crime they should pay the time.
I think that juveniles should get the adult sentence, because they committed the crime they should pay the time. Only if it's serious like rape, murder, and big theft. If we don't stop them now think of all the things they'll do when their older.That's why they should get the adult sentence and that is all I have to say.
Posted by: AnonymousHeinous is heinous no matter the offender
Why should the offender get immunity simply because of a particular group? No one group has immunity when becoming a victim. As for their brain not being developed with the appropriate decision making skills, a toddler knows when something wrong is done as they hide before punishment comes along. If you do the crime, you should pay the price.
Posted by: AnonymousThink before you act. People need to face to consequences
Yes people should be tried as adults for violent crimes such as murder and rape. My in prison in my mind is absolutely ridiculous. People need a change for rehabilitation and a second chance at life. I don't think that some people understand the fact that everyone does make stupid mistakes but everyone can change and should have to chance to.
Posted by: AnonymousYes I believe so!
If the minors just get detention for murdering then they will get off the hook multiple times. It's not enough picking up garbage for a life gone.Think about it, the police will just make minors pick up garbage for a crime. Everyone should be treated equally not by their age. If minors are old enough to commit the crime their old enough to face the consequence.
Posted by: AnonymousViolence is an adult choice, so those who choose it should be treated as such.
If a juvenile chooses to violently attack someone, they have chosen to act in an adult fashion. Therefore, the court system should treat them as the adults that they are trying to be. Harsher punishments at a young age may deter further violent acts in the future and may cause them to re-think their choices.
Posted by: BLeonardYes I think so.
Juveniles need to be responsible for their actions. If they are able to do the adult crime, they need to take the adult punishment. Teenagers know what they are doing when they commit a crime. Also if you were just going to put them in juvenile court, they will think they can get away with it. Juvenile court is not enough for a teenager if they have committed a serious crime. The punishment should be based on the crime they did and not the age.
Posted by: AnonymousCrime will always will be a crime not depending on your age.
Everybody should be treated equally not relying on their age, but on factor of the violence of the crime. All juveniles that have committed a crime should be tried in court like every criminal individual and get the same chastisement for their awful crimes. For example, kids get education and know that they cannot murder other or steal, but why do they still do it? Sometimes when a minor commits an even more horrible crime than an adult, why should he or she get exceptional outcomes and not go to prison. Finally, age is not an excuse and if they get away with it now, later in life it will become a habit or even a hobby. Consequently, we need action to save our world from terrible felonies committed by teenagers or kids, so support this law by writing a request to your state government and finally everyone will be punished for their horrible crimes!
Posted by: AnonymousKids need to learn from their mistakes!
They should because if three is no punishment kids will think its okay and keep doing it! Kids learn from their mistakes, or wrongdoings, and if there is no punishment for their wrongdoing the children will be like "Well, if I get punished for everything I do wrong, and I didn't get punished for this, then it must be okay!"
Posted by: Anonymousabsolutely they should
Violent juvenile offenders are not innocent. They have well developed criminal thinking patterns that are not likely to change. Putting them juvenile offenders who can be rehabilitated not only hurts those offenders, it just gives them the idea (rightly so) that they have no accountability for what they do. And they will keep on doing what they do, until there is some consequence worthy of their consideration.
Posted by: AnonymousTeach them the hard way.
You learn the hard way, you learn the BEST way. If you are given a slap on the wrist, there is nothing that will really prevent you from continuing down the road you have already chosen. You will have no deterrence to help you align your mentality with that as society.
Posted by: AnonymousThey should be punished.
Because the fact is, they committed a crime. ANYONE should be punished for that. A life could've been taken! If you don't stop them now, they will think it is okay to do it in the future, and won't be prepared if they do the same crime again as an adult, and be put in jail. This isn't about the proper brain development. Teenagers can tell if they are doing something right or wrong, but ignore the right way. Can you imagine if someone you cared about was killed or hurt by a teenager? But, they weren't given much punishment, and are still wandering the streets of your neighborhood, out to commit another crime? This could be a person's life we are talking about. You can save a person from being hurt or worse by agreeing that juveniles should be treated as adults in court!
Posted by: AnonymousJuveniles should be treated as adults in court.
I think if a juvenile commits a serious crime, like murder, then they should be treated like an adult in court. If an adult commits a crime is it any different? I believe it is not, if they murder or steal from stores or houses,they are going to think that they can get away with it if they do it again. The juveniles, who commit serious crimes (like murder), have to take responsibility for their actions.
Posted by: AnonymousKids that commit violent crime should be tried as adults because they knew what they were doing.
Yes, because if they commit a crime and know what they are doing, they are old enough to be punished. If they do the crime they can do the time just like anyone else. No matter the age of a child, if they do something really bad, they should be punished.
Posted by: AnonymousYes they should.
All kids think that they aren't going to get punished for there actions but as always some kids only learn the hard way.Just like my kid he decicded to go rob from a store cause he knew as a child that he wasn't going to get a harsh punishment ,but he did cause he never learned that as a kid you get treated differently.
Posted by: AnonymousCause & Effect
Whilst I would not seek vengence on wrongdoers at any age I nevertheless believe that at every age the response should empasise that every action has a consequence, good and bad, and that there are bounderies within which levels of personal behavior is acceptable but that a price has to be paid if these bounderies are breached. The level and type of response should therefore reflect the wrongdoers existing experience of the world and their existing perception of right and wrong.
Posted by: AnonymousThey know what they are getting in to.
If juveniles know that they can get in serious trouble for a really bad crime why do they do it? Don't they know the penalties that come with such a crime? Some juveniles do, but they don't take it seriously. That's why we need to have them tried as adults so they know that it is a serious situation when you commit a crime..
Posted by: AnonymousThey should be.
People say we should be treated equally, which means whatever an adult is sentenced to, so should teens. Juveniles that commit crimes should be tried as adults. When teens commit a crime, they should be ready for the consequences, because if they know they committed a crime they know what they are doing .The sooner a teen is held accountable for their actions, the sooner they will know there are consequences for their actions. They need to understand they can't always get away with everything they do .That is the age that children should know what they are doing or what is right or wrong. This is the only way to get rid of teen criminals.
Posted by: AnonymousYes, they should.
If you're 10-17 and commit a crime like stealing, rape, or even murder you should be tried as adult because between those ages you knew what you were doing but chose to do it, so that's your fault. Also if you get away with doing one of those crimes listed further up you should not get away with it because you're a kid. Finally, this is someone's things, mind, and life you're hurting. It's not right at all, so I believe if you're 10-17 and commit a crime like stealing, rape, or murder you should be tried as adult no matter what reason you did it for.
Posted by: AnonymousKids should be tried for an adult manor if they commit an adult crime
Yes, if a child in annolesence admits to purposely murdering in any degree they should be tried in an adult court that normally an adult would be tried for the same crime therefore the child should receive the same punishment which in all other means would be fair. however we must put into mind the age of accountability therefore if a five year old is being tried we might think a little different.
Posted by: AnonymousJuveniles treated as adults
Yes, juveniles who murder, rape, and consistently cause trouble should be treated as adults because they made a grown up decision to do so. I think the "eye-for-an-eye" falls into effect with any age.
Posted by: AnonymousYes
We are not looking at age, we are looking at the gravity of the crime committed. Any individual who kills another person without a valid reason, should be held responsible for their actions. Of course we need to look at the situation for example if a child kills another, in self defense then the situation is questionable. But if a child kills to kill, or does something intentionally then they should be by all means they should be treated as adults in court.
How are we know that, that child who has committed the felony wont do it again. We can not take the risk.Posted by: AnonymousYes In some instances
If a child is raped by a 17 year old and an 18 year old rapes a child how is it any different. The seventeen year old is getting away will get in less trouble when doing the same crime. I don't know if that is right. Kids know right mow that they cannot get in that much trouble for doing stuff like this.
Posted by: AnonymousThey totally deserve it.
Juveniles and teens that commit crimes should be treated as an adult because they should know what will happen if you commit a crime. And it isn't like a teen will be thrown in jail for life if they punch someone in the face. No, these teens have to do horrible stuff. For example, a 14 year old boy beat his neighbor almost to death, then while the neighbor was barely alive, this certain 14 year old put the man in his house and burned the house. The man was pronounced dead. These juveniles are horrible and should be treated like they act. Also, if other teens know the consequences they will be less likely to commit a crime.
Posted by: AnonymousDo the adult crime, do the adult time.
If a juvenile can do the adult crime, especially in instances like rape or murder, they can and should face the adult criminal system and the adult sentence that goes with a conviction. It is insane that because someone is under the age of 18 that they can get what amounts to a slap on the wrist for even the most serious of crimes like rape or murder. It's an insult to justice and an insult to the victims of such crimes. If they are committing serious crimes as minors then it's virtually a guarantee that once they are adults they will continue their violent criminal tendencies which means more people will get hurt. Better to stop them sooner rather than later. Try minors who commit crimes like rape or murder as adults rather than give them juvenile sentences allowing them to rape or murder again as adults. The victim deserves mercy not the perpetrator regardless of age and the victim (as well as society) deserves justice.
Posted by: AnonymousYes everyone should be treated equally!
Even though they're teenagers they are mature enough to know what they're doing. They're not dumb. If we don't do anything now then all of our teens are going to think it's okay to continue doing awful crimes. Teens love to go against the law, but we need to put an end to this.
Posted by: AnonymousIf you do bad things expect a big problem.
I think they should be treated like an adult if they do something bad to someone else and they do adult things. Juveniles deserve to be treated this way. If they do something big then they should be treated like a big person. If they commit a crime they should expect something big to come to their doorstep.
Posted by: AnonymousThe results of an action is the same no matter how we treat the offender.
The fact of the matter is that the harms against society are the same no matter the motives or the actor. It is the responsibility of society acting in it's duty of justice to treat all offenders equally without exemption for any one group. Furthermore, the juvenile justice system is a slap on the wrist compared to the adult justice system, with a majority of juvenile offenders stating that the chance of being considered as adults may have caused them to not commit their crime. In addition, giving juveniles separate treatment does not foster responsibility. Most juveniles are capable of developed thought, and blanket treatment of juveniles as separate and incompetent protects the most heinous offenders. Finally, it is simply harmful to assume protection for a group and say they have no responsibility because then they adopt their "irresponsible" roles in society and lose any chance of becoming responsible. Society already pampers it's members with irresponsibility, and it's time to start fixing the no consequence state.
Posted by: AnonymousYes!!!!!!
Me being a teenager I know what is right and wrong. Yes some kids can do stupid things but if you deliberately kill someone or rape them why shouldn't you be treated like an adult in court. Some kids might do it again so they need a longer punishment time. On the other hand, I do think that courts should consider other factors, like how serious the crime is, the juvenile's previous criminal record and their upbringing, before determining if they should be tried as an adult.
Posted by: AnonymousYes, they should be treated as adults in court, if they are responsible of committing murder.
People think that kids are "still developing their minds", but if they are smart enough to murder someone, they are able to handle the price. If the kid has murdered someone, it is not the parents fault for the child's wrong doings. Not only should they be put in court, they should be punished. If they aren't punished, they will think it is okay to keep on murdering innocent people.
Posted by: AnonymousThere should be consequences for their crimes.
Yes, but only if it is very serious such as a homicide, rape, big theft, etc. Children and teens who are in 7th grade or above should get an adult trial. The kids have been taught to do the right thing, but they have still chosen to commit the crime. If the kids are smart enough to commit the crime, they should be ready for the consequences they will face.
Posted by: AnonymousWhy not be punished?
If a child is old enough to intentionally commit a serious crime, they are certainly old enough to need to be punished. They need to now understand what will happen to them in the real world. Letting them off just creates bad habits. When they are an adult they will pay for their crimes, why lead them to believe that they won't? I'm a child, and if I do something wrong I want to go to jail and find the error of my ways so I can change.
Posted by: Anonymous
NO!
I think Juveniles should get a second chance. They still have some growing up to do. These young kids deserve to have a chance at the real world. Maybe they need to seek help. They might have grown up in that type of enviroment. No one knows their situation. I think juveniles should be helped, not punished. They need a chance to change their path of life.
Posted by: bhawk3Should kids who commit adult crimes go to jail?
Imagine a younger sibling or a younger cousin of yours, curious and happy, not having a care in the world. They have not yet seen the dangers of the world. Now, picture this in your head, picture there usually happy faces are now covered with fear and a sad face. Once they were free but now they are wearing shackles around their arms and their legs, shackles to big for them, shackles meant for someone older. Shackles not meant for them. Imagine if the last time you saw your younger sibling/cousin you saw them, you see them getting escorted into a big metal cage and you watch as the door slams right in their little faces. It would be awful seeing that. Kids under the age of 16 should not go to jail, even if they do commit the heinous of crimes, because they are children.
Adolescents are old enough to understand the difference between right and wrong, but they are too young to make the right choices yet. As Laurence Steinberg, Professor at Temple University, says “The teenage brain is like a car with a good accelerator but has a weak brake.” Studies have shown that based on adolescent’s brain development, adolescents are more likely to act on impulse, misread social cues and emotions, and/or engage in risky behavior. Adolescents are less likely to think before they act, or pause to consider the potential consequences of their actions. These brain differences don’t mean that young people can’t make good decisions or tell the difference between right and wrong. It also doesn’t mean that they shouldn’t be held responsible for their actions. It just means that adolescents are not able to make wise decisions.
Another reason why kids shouldn’t go to jail is that it is wrong to hold kids to adult standards. Children are not permitted to the same rights as an adult because of their inability to make wise decisions.Scientists have identified a “specific region of the brain called the amygdala which is responsible for instinctual reactions including fear and aggressive behavior.” This region develops early. However, the frontal cortex, the area of the brain that controls reasoning and helps us think before we act, develops later. For adolescents, this region of the brain is not fully grown yet.With time, this part of the brain is still changing and maturing well into a good adulthood, and with that, good decisions. So why should children be held to adult standards when they don’t have the same rights as them. For an example we don’t say, “This is a very important election so let’s let the kids vote”, right, so why should people say, “This case is different and this kid deserves to be treated as an adult and locked away in prison”. It doesn’t make sense.
Lastly, children who commit crimes, even the ones who commit the most unforgivable of crimes, can be rehabilitated and become responsible adults.
Children should not go to jail because at the time, you were too busy doing this and probably not thinking about your actions as you did. You just knew that you needed to have/do this, you weren’t thinking of other people. It’s after you got caught and were punished for it, that you reflect on your actions. You were punished for it, but you weren’t locked away for it. When it came the time again for that decision, you had learned better than that. But you didn’t even have to be locked away for that did you, You learned from your mistakes. We all make mistakes. Children who commit serious crimes still have the ability to change their lives for the better. It is now up to up to the adults to help them, and lead them out on the path of life This is why children under 16 should not go to jail.Posted by: kid101the adult system doesnt work
It is said that about 57.6% of all offences are committed by people who have previously been sentenced by a court. The rate for young offenders ages 10-17 from 2000-2004 was 41.3% that alone was a 3.8% fall since 2000 Bridgett Jones former supervisor of the juvenile division said “we have this incredibly ineffective adult system, and now we want to take kids, and put them into what we already know is ineffective why?” what kids need is Rehabilitation and Counseling
Posted by: AnonymousCEO not fully developed in teens!
Studies show that teens CEO part of the brain is not fully developed, like adults. No, I mean don't get me wrong, I don't think that in just any case they should be held under 18 courts, but in most cases, non-life threatening like murder, then it shouldn't be held in an adult case.
Posted by: AnonymousContradiction
I don't understand how if you commit a crime they can try you as an adult but if you want to buy a pack of smokes they can turn you away saying that you are too young. Laws should be the same across the board. Nobody should be charged as an adult that is not even old enough to be in high school.
Posted by: AnonymousNO WAY!
I believe that children are still developing and are made to learn from their mistakes to become an adult. When adults do crimes they already know almost everything that is right and wrong because of their childhood mistakes. It is absoulutly unfair for anyone under the age of 18 years old to be treated like adults in court. Once they are adults they take full responsabilities on their actions because they are ready for those consequences.
Posted by: AnonymousNo
They should just put them in rehabilitation instead of solitary confinement! You're basically abusing the child! they would torment themselves if they are isolated in that tiny space by themselves for how many months. They would cut themselves because they are so bored! Instead of doing that, they can stay at at rehabilitation center and gain more control over themselves! like what people say, kids are still too young, they make mistakes, and learn from them! they are still growing up! when they are adults, meaning they have their own life, own responsibilities on their actions then it makes sense to give the right consequences they have to pay.
Posted by: AnonymousAre they adults?
No, they are not adults. Seems absurd to think otherwise. Do they have the rights of an adult? Before committing the crime, are they considered an adult? After committing the crime, if not a felony, are they now able to vote? Are they now eligible to be drafted? Flush your emotions and think about this logically.
Posted by: AnonymousShould kids who commit adult crimes go to jail?
Should kids who commit adult crimes go to jail?
Imagine a younger sibling or a younger cousin of yours, curious and happy, not having a care in the world. They have not yet seen the dangers of the world. Now, picture this in your head, picture there usually happy faces are now covered with fear and a sad face. Once they were free but now they are wearing shackles around their arms and their legs, shackles to big for them, shackles meant for someone older. Shackles not meant for them. Imagine if the last time you saw your younger sibling/cousin you saw them, you see them getting escorted into a big metal cage and you watch as the door slams right in their little faces. It would be awful seeing that. Kids under the age of 16 should not go to jail, even if they do commit the heinous of crimes, because they are children. Adolescents are old enough to understand the difference between right and wrong, but they are too young to make the right choices yet. As Laurence Steinberg, Professor at Temple University, says “The teenage brain is like a car with a good accelerator but has a weak brake.” Studies have shown that based on adolescent’s brain development, adolescents are more likely to act on impulse, misread social cues and emotions, and/or engage in risky behavior. Adolescents are less likely to think before they act, or pause to consider the potential consequences of their actions. These brain differences don’t mean that young people can’t make good decisions or tell the difference between right and wrong. It also doesn’t mean that they shouldn’t be held responsible for their actions. It just means that adolescents are not able to make wise decisions. Another reason why kids shouldn’t go to jail is that it is wrong to hold kids to adult standards. Children are not permitted to the same rights as an adult because of their inability to make wise decisions.Scientists have identified a “specific region of the brain called the amygdala which is responsible for instinctual reactions including fear and aggressive behavior.” This region develops early. However, the frontal cortex, the area of the brain that controls reasoning and helps us think before we act, develops later. For adolescents, this region of the brain is not fully grown yet.With time, this part of the brain is still changing and maturing well into a good adulthood, and with that, good decisions. So why should children be held to adult standards when they don’t have the same rights as them.Posted by: AnonymousIt's the parents fault.
It is the responsibility of the parent to raise the kid not to be a bad Criminal, that or long enough for the kid to grow up and be old enough to be consider (the legal age). After that it is not the responsibility of the parent to take care of the child, or be held responsible for their actions. Until then if someone brings a kid into this world they should take full responsibility for the actions of there child.
Posted by: wesjonesNo
Juveniles should be reasonably punished, but not like how adult offenders get punished. Juveniles should be punished a reasonable amount and should be in rehabilitation centers. A young offender may not have been taught correctly. Treatment centers could "take the place" of their parent in teaching, since their was lack of teaching and discipline to begin with.
Posted by: AnonymousNo they should not
If children were able to think like adults at a young age then they would let them fight in wars and drink at an earlier age . Perhaps it is just due to a mentally ill child or other circumstances . I do agree they should have a place for them that may try to rehabilitate are help the children . You never know what theses children have been through until you walk in there shoes. Some may be being abused, molested, are living in a hostile environment . If we want to point the blame point it at society and the way things have changed for example both parents being extensively gone from the home and children being left alone,therefore , being abused by teachers, policemen, and leaders who are supposed to extend a helping hand but are just as evil.
Posted by: yoshamendiaNo, the violent juveniles should not be treated as adults in court because of their age.
No, I totally disagree that the violent juveniles should be treated as adults in the court. This is because they are underage, and just because they are violent juveniles, they cannot be treated as adults. Moreover, they don't have enough discrimination power to decide upon what is right and what is wrong. They are not under the capacity what is violence and what is non-violence.So, the violent juveniles shouldn't be treated as adults in court.
Posted by: I0rFashionChildren are children and adults are adults
I see children as good and innocent and they need to be treated by the welfare model, children who do wrong are doing so because they have been mistreated or deprived in some way. Therapy should be offered for them to rebuild their self-esteem and self-confidence. We as society, should protect children and recognize children´s inherent goodness if they do wrong, and not because they are evil! If children commit crimes they need to be offered HELP to fit back to the society. No punishment is useful in this situation.
Posted by: AnonymousNo
If the main goal of our criminal justice system is punishing wrongdoers than we should try juveniles as adults, but if we're hoping to make society safer than we shouldn't try juveniles as adults because it makes society less safe. Juveniles tried as adults have higher recidivism rates because they spend essential developmental years in prison with seasoned criminals. It's not a question of whether they know right from wrong. It's about dealing with delinquent behaviors before children become adults. With the youth, we have a chance of changing their lives and turning them away from criminal careers. But if all we care about as a society is punishment, then we're doing fantastic job.
Posted by: AnonymousTeens and adults
I choose NO because I believe that many children are innocent and took blame or are being blamed for someone else crime. Also, the adults who gave them the guns should be accountable for their actions because they are the reason they had a powerful weapon in the hands.
Posted by: AnonymousNo way!
facts have been proven that kids minds aren't yet developed and what they do is just an impulse. Their brains (frontal lobe especially) is lacking the tissue to make any logical decision. teens included. why do you think that people can't vote until they are 18. That's when they are reasonable enough to make a good choice. kids can't drive until they are 16, they can't vote until 18, can't drink until 21. why are we putting them in jail at 15. age limits are there for a reason.
Posted by: AnonymousNo
According to the government ,they are not responsible or mature enough to have the full rights of adults, so how can they be responsible enough to obey laws at level of adults .
Posted by: AnonymousEach case is unique, so deciding how to treat each person accused of commuting a crime should also be unique.
In many instances, it is appropriate to treat juvenile offenders as adults when trying them in court. However, this is not always the case. There is no way to decide something like this for all cases together. Each individual case would need to be looked at, including the crime or crimes, the history of the juvenile, how likely rehabilitation would be, and the odds that there will be another violent crime committed by the same child if allowed to be tried as such.
Posted by: TownNoamLittle time to Live...Learn from Mistakes
The brain is still developing and not all people are aware of what has been done and has happened. Some kids need help and not everyone sees it right away. Children need time to develop and learn from their mistakes. Sending children to jail and or prison for life or half of their life is no help. This may worsen the child and we may see more of them in the future.
Posted by: AnonymousBrain is not developed.
The pre-frontal cortex which is the main source of the humans behavior is not fully developed until around the age of 25. This means that the decisions that will be made, will not be at the best of the juveniles ability at a physical standpoint. They are not adults and should not be tried as such.
Posted by: AnonymousThere is no rehabilitation in the adult system.
We need to work with people to help them lead healthy lives, they will get no chance for that in the adult system. To throw their lives away is inhumane and our obsession with punishment instead of rehabilitation is not helping anybody. We can be better than the current system. We have resources and smart people who could help if we put the right programs in place.
Posted by: AnonymousViolent teens should not be treated as adults in court because juvenile punishments are enough.
Sometimes, there is more than meets the eye. Teens, as young adults, are trying to find themselves, and if you treat them like an adult at such a young age in court when they mess up, it can be very bad for them and they will never be able to have a life or a future. If you charge a young kid for something small but violent, like getting in a fight, that could be very bad for them and it wont give them the opportunity to do a lot in the lives. If you get in trouble, then you will have that on your record forever. You wont be able to get rid of it. Getting a job would be harder for you in every way and you would have difficulties. As a young adult in such a scary place with people way older than you and who have done worse things then you did, it would be terrible. You would loose everything you believed in. It may not make you a better person, where as, if you went through the Juvi system you would have a better chance of making something better for yourself and learning something. It might be enough of a difference to not make you want to go back or to go into something much worse.
Posted by: AnonymousPunishment doesn't have to be severe to be effective.
Children shouldn't be tried as adults. Many people agree with the saying "Let the crime fit the punishment." This statement is true but it does not mean that children should be treated as an adult. You have to look at the nature of the offense as well as the moral responsibility. It has been proven that punishment is ineffective when dealing with children. In fact it is thirty-four percent more likely for a minor to continue committing crimes after being released from a prison than a minor charged of similar crimes who went to a juvenile detention. These continued crimes are usually a result of hyper-violence due to assault in the prison. Charging a child as a minor does not mean that they aren't punished. It just means that their penalty is not as severe as an adults would be. Which makes sense. Children deserve a second shot at life.
Posted by: AnonymousTeenagers need a chance, so no.
Teenagers who commit an adult crime shouldn't be charged as adults for a reason. My first reason is that not all teenagers or juveniles have been taught correctly in terms of what you can and cannot do, and they haven't gotten the full message that killing or other violent crimes comes with a lot of consequences. Giving teenagers a chance will give a message that they won't be so lucky next time they do the same thing.
My second reason teenagers shouldn't be charged as adults is because it's a really frightening thing to be jailed next to an adult in a prison, especially if you're a kid. It really doesn't make sense to put a kid next to prisoners that are there because they have been charged for hurting, raping, or killing kids.Posted by: Anonymousit's not the same
We're deciding at a point in their life when we simply don't have the ability to know who he'll be in 10 or 15 or 20 years.
It's equal to sentencing someone to die in prison. It's making these irrevocable decisions about kids under circumstances where the research doesn't support making those kinds of decisions.Posted by: AnonymousChildren should not be tried as adults.
Juveniles under the age of 18 have not fully developed their brains, so it can affect the way that they think.
Juveniles also have parents who teach them the way of doing things and handling situations. If ones parent teaches them wrongly which causes them to do violent things then it is not their fault really.
Juveniles may have mental illness. Teenagers or children may have an illness that no one knows about yet. Many young children have mental illnesses but, they do not really show until older age.
Children also do not have the rights that people above the age of 18 have. Kids cannot drink, they cannot serve in war, and other things. If they are not allowed to have the rights that full American citizens have, then why should they be treated as adults in the court of law?Posted by: AnonymousNo teens should not
They still have some chances to grow, and everybody deserves a second chance. The kids are still growing. You're basically abusing the child. They would torment themselves if they are isolated in that tiny space by themselves. According to the government, they aren't responsible or mature enough to have the full right of adults, so how can they be responsible enough to obey laws at the level of adults?
Posted by: AnonymousChildren deserve safety
When children are tried as adults, they are more likely to lose their freedom at such a young age and are exposed to a terrifying, harsh environment in adult prison. Research studies have shown that juveniles recidivate at a much higher rate when released from adult prison than when they are released from a juvenile detention center. Although children account for 1% of the adult prison population, they account for 21% of the reported sexual assault cases within prison. These children are serving out their sentence next to child molesters and predators who were jailed in the first place to keep them away from children. Adult prisons do not have the resources of the funding to provide the nutritional and medical needs that juveniles require as they continue to grow. Some are placed on a 23 hour lockdown to try and protect them from the rest of the prison population. This creates many mental health hazards, and contributes to many juvenile suicides while in adult prison. Children are 36 times more likely to commit suicide in adult prison than a juvenile detention center. Each state has different laws for when they send children to adult court. Some are age laws, others vary by the condition of the crime, but children as young as 10 have been sentenced to life behind bars. Some states are trying to reform their laws to keep juveniles in the juvenile justice system. Either way, juveniles need to remain in the juvenile justice system to protect their physical and mental health, as well as giving them a better chance at rehabilitation for the crime they committed.
Posted by: AnonymousSending kids to jail maybe the easiest way, but is not a solution at all.
In recent times, people have been discussing what is the right thing to do when a juvenile commits a crime. You probably have heard this before.
To begin with, I would like to say that the statement above is a mere generalization and absolutely incomplete. In my opinion, this is a more complex situation.
First of all, what is “crime?" A crime involves a lot of things, from a 16-year-old guy having a beer to a man murdering, stealing, and raping a woman. This is the reason why I think we cannot talk about crimes in general. Besides, I would like to add that children are responsible for their actions only to a certain extent.
As far as I am concerned, teenagers who are guilty of serious crimes need assistance and support services to find out why they act as they do; not a punishment which will leave them in jail for the rest of their lives. It is well known that jails are places full of violence. If a child is raised in a harsh environment, the last thing he needs is to be in jail where the only thing he will get is being around criminals. On the other hand, I don’t think sending them back to the street is a solution either. The state should provide social assistance for children.
In conclusion, sending kids to jail or back to the streets maybe the easiest way, but it is not a solution. Children need education and a child is not responsible for the atmosphere in which he has been raised. Children need an opportunity to be someone.Posted by: AnonymousThey should not be tried as an adult.
Violent juveniles shouldn't be tried as adults. Children are easily manipulated and can be mind-controlled by anyone who can persuade them into doing what they would want them to do. Children may lose their innocence, but they're still not emotionally fit to be put into the adult legal system. Minors are still minors and should not be held accountable for a mistake they've possibly have not done.
Posted by: ayeweezyyOnly for certain crimes - "violent" does not just mean "murder".
For direct crimes against persons (yes, murder, but also armed robbery, rape, etc.), children should be treated as adults. Kindergartners know these things are wrong; are you really going to claim that the last bit of brain development impairs their decision-making abilities to that extent? If the kid has a problem with irresistible impulse or something, that's what the insanity defense is for. However, accomplices, B&Es, and such should not be prosecuted as an adult unless they are repeat offenders.
Posted by: AnonymousJuveniles are not adults and should not be treated as such, because they do not think the same as adults.
Juveniles are children. They do not have the same thought processes that adults have. They act on emotions or wants, without thinking their actions through completely. Oftentimes, juveniles are being influenced by an adult in their life. Courts and judges should look at who made the juvenile the way they are, and the living environment that the juvenile is from.
Posted by: WindyTrevor49They should Not be treated as adults
Because of the following reasons:
A) The very existence of juveniles, the word "juvenile" that is, is to differentiate crimes committed by adults and crime committed by minors
B) Juveniles tend to commit crime without thinking about the consequences of their acts
C) The main reason for punishment is reform and if in such a case a child is sentenced as an adult the psychological effects would be negative rather than positive since they are at a very tender age and have great chances of reform.Posted by: AnonymousViolent juveniles should not be treated as adults in court.
I believe that juveniles who are accused of violent crimes should not be treated as adults in court. There are many studies which show that the juvenile brain is not fully developed and because of that the decision making process for juveniles is different from that of an adult.
As a teenager I made plenty of decisions which were not the best and as an adult I wouldn't have come to the same decision I made as a teenager. Juveniles who are guilty of violent crimes need counseling and support services to find out why they acted as they did not a punishment which will leave them in jail for the rest of their lives.Posted by: KHendrixDouble Standards Abounding
The whole premise behind being tried as an adult should be that you're an ADULT when you commit the crime. Whats the point of having an age criteria, which is followed in other areas (i.e. drinking, tobacco use, etc) when its not even followed in a court of law. It is yet another flaw in our justice system that should be addressed.
Posted by: AnonymousThey are children!
Youth behavior is malleable, and can be reformed with treatment and successful rehabilitation. Once they reach a certain age as adults is when they cannot be rehabilitated. Children make mistakes, and they are always learning. Because they make a foolish mistake with the law does not mean they should be punished that seriously.
Posted by: Anonymousi say juveniles should not be tried as adults
because they still have some growing up to do, plus if a juvenile commits murder they are already getting 25 to life. but that still is not enough. If they get tried as an adult they get even more time. but i say they should not get tried as adults because juveniles still cant drive until they are 16, smoke until they are 18, and drink until they are 21. So i feel like if they can tried us as an adult for committing a crime then they can let us drive , smoke and drink at the age of 17.
Posted by: AnonymousThey don't realize what they are doing.
The juveniles don't realize what they are doing. They may know it is a crime but they don't realize how severe their crimes are. If you think about it, they also have a lot of potential to change. Adults do not have that same potential. If they are not adults, do not treat them like one.
Posted by: AnonymousNO!!!!!
They commit the crimes for a reason, it's just that nobody listens to their reason. Nobody deserves to be stuck in a tiny room with another person who will do god knows what to them. Do you want your kid to be violated in prison? No? Well they don't belong in there.
Posted by: Anonymousabsolutely not
Adolescents may think they know right from wrong. but the truth is the brain is not fully developed until the age of 20. And the part of the brain that develops last is the frontal lobe that controls what right and wrong is decided. Teens are more than likely see the benefits out of doing something risky rather than see the long term consequences of their actions. It is during this period of life that we experiment with drugs and alcohol. It is during this time that we are curious about our bodies. It is during this time that we are trying to form some sort of identity, and our friends help to influence who we are and who we will be. Therefore, if our friends indulge in risky behaviors, then we are probably going to follow suit. Most crimes committed by teens was within a group setting, most teens don't commit crimes alone. peer pressure needs to be addressed, and the development of the brain needs to be considered when trying teens for major crimes, their decision making skills are still in their infancy.
Posted by: davidhgeorge.96A child is not a man
As Texas law maker, Ron Wilson stated, "you want to throw the adult book at kids?. . lower the voting age to 14." Juveniles are not allowed to drink, or smoke or vote. But, the law wants to treat them as adults once it comes to a serious crime ? That's just ridiculous. If anything treating a juvenile s an adult will make matters worse if or when they are able to get out. Kids are not capable of understanding the magnitude of the situation, nor are they able to defend themselves. The adolescent brain is compared to that of a person with mental disabilities, and you want to try them as adults ? "it is a violation of the constitutional rights to be a defendant in a criminal proceeding when you are not competent to defend yourself."
Posted by: AnonymousJuveniles should not be treated as adults in court.
When a child does something wrong even if it is violent, they are not adults. It is unfair to act like it is OK to treat them as if they have the mind and knowledge like an adult does. There are separate rules in place for the reason that children and adults have different ways of processing information, and often children do not realize the consequences that they may experience for what they have done.
Posted by: B3rkIffyChildren Are Not Adults Yet!
Children don’t have the intellectual or moral capacity to understand the consequences of their actions; similarly, they lack the same capacity to be trial defendants. I think personally the juvenile prison system can help kids turn their lives around and the fact that rehabilitation gives the child a second chance.
Posted by: AnonymousAlthough I can understand the inclination to treat violent teens as adults, we have juvenile courts for a reason.
Juvenile courts were established long ago to deal with juveniles who have run-ins with the law. Yes, it sometimes happens that juveniles are extremely violent. But, it should still be the goal of the court system to attempt to rehabilitate them under juvenile law, rather than throwing in the towel at the first sign of violence, and sending them to prison with even more violent, hardened criminals.
Posted by: TrainLockScarred for life
While I do believe that teens who says things like "They won't do anything, I'm too young!" Should be treated as adults, but the ones who are honestly sorry and were under the influence and sign up for help and support groups to get clean and change their life instead of just rotting in a jail cell feeling like this is truly hell in every form. Perhaps it's pure sympathy but I believe everyone has a good reason for something, whether its one too many beating by a parent figure tipped them over the edge, or their thoughts were clouded in an alcoholic haze, they had a reason, and we should hear their side and then put ourselves in their shoes.
Posted by: AnonymousTreating juveniles as adults contradicts the purpose of the juvenile court system. The need to see the perpetrator punished overrides our faith in the justice system we have established.
Presumably, the juvenile court system exists because at some point legislators determined that minors did not have the same ability to ascertain the difference between right and wrong as most adults do. Now, it often seems that we use "trying as an adult" as an added punishment for especially heinous or well-publicized crimes. This contradicts the purpose of the juvenile court -- who is to say that these minors know right from wrong in any more "adult" way as teenagers who are caught shoplifting? I think that in certain instances, the juvenile court system is perceived to provide inadequate justice, and the strange need to see the perpetrator punished overrides our faith in the justice system we have established.
Posted by: Shim2freeJuveniles are young teenagers who are still learning lessons in life and aren't as mature as adults in their 30s up would be.
Juvenile court was opened for a reason and that was so that juveniles/teenagers would be trailed in that court. Young teenagers like 15-year-olds might have been high and on drugs because maybe they turned to those things for help if they were having depression or family issues. They are still going through life, learning their mistakes and consequences. Also, they aren't that wise as an actual adult would be.
Posted by: AnonymousBecause they shouldn't be.
Because kids are kids, under the law teenagers are not considered adults so why would they be considered adults only in court? They shouldn't. Also they don't have other adult privileges such as smoking, drinking, serving in war, voting, and other things. They will start to expect these things if you start treating them like adults.
Posted by: AnonymousNot in right state of mind.
Teens at this age are very emotional. They don't know what they're doing, so why treat them as adults? What if they are angry and just do some stupid things? Like one case, Andy (not saying last name because none of your business), he wasn't the only one who did it, but was the only one to get treated as an adult.
Posted by: AnonymousTHEY SHOULD NOT
Adolescent brain research shows that children's brains are developing well into their early 20s and that youth do not have all the mental capacities of adults. In fact, the final part of the brain to mature is the prefrontal cortex, which governs the "executive functions" of reasoning, advanced thought and impulse control. This suggests that children not only should be held less culpable for their actions, but also that they remain malleable and able to respond to rehabilitation.
Posted by: AnonymousNo
It is widely acknowledged today, however, both in Australia and internationally, that juveniles should be subject to a system of criminal justice that is separate from the adult system and that recognises their inexperience and immaturity. As such, juveniles are typically dealt with separately from adults and treated less harshly than their adult counterparts.
Posted by: AnonymousI do not agree because juveniles don't have the mental capability to think of the consequences of their actions.
I strongly oppose the treatment of juveniles as adults because their mental abilities have not fully developed to imagine the consequences of their actions. In most cases, the juveniles are presented before the court either because their actions are guided by the adults or because they do not know what they have done is a crime, so judging them as adults is not simply fair!
Posted by: KI3JoIIyIt's not right
I negate that juveniles charged with violent crimes should be tried and punished as adults.
To ensure there are no misconceptions in interpreting the resolution, I will provide the following definitions. Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law defines juvenile as an individual who is under an age fixed by law at which he or she would be charged as an adult for a criminal act. Many state justice systems consider 17 and under a juvenile. In North Carolina, a juvenile is fifteen years and younger. Black Law's Dictionary defines violent crime as a crime that violates the rights of one's person or property. Thomson Gale Legal Encyclopedia defines an adult as a person who by virtue of attaining a certain age, generally eighteen, is regarded in the eyes of the law as being able to manage his or her own affairs.
My value will be Sanctity of Human Life, which is important because every human has rights, dignity, and value. This value relates to the resolution because by trying and punishing juveniles as adults undermines the value of today's youth and what they could become. One mistake should not ruin the rest of a fifteen-year-old boy or girl's life.
My criterion will be the protection of rights. This criterion is important because the rights of juveniles in the justice system, such as confidential records and rehabilitation services, are kept in place to help juveniles continue with their future. This criterion achieves my value premise because how well one's rights are protected can have a big impact on the sanctity or worth of one's life.
My first contention is that juveniles are not capable of meaningful participation in his or her defense. A Criminal Justice Magazine article states, "Just as the capacities of some adults are limited by their mental disorders so, too, may some youths' participation in the legal process be limited by their as-yet underdeveloped capacities." The article goes on to address the juvenile's understanding of the law and ability to assist counsel makes them less capable of participating in the defense than the average adult defendant. Even though youths may develop the capacity for understanding rights early in adolescence, it often takes additional time and life experiences before their capacity influences their actual understanding. Knowing the difference between right and wrong is different than understanding long consequences. A Miranda Rights Study showed that the ability to comprehend legal information is poorer in adolescents of low intelligence than adults of likewise low intelligence. The same study also suggested youth have trouble separating the defense attorney from court authority. About a third of them (compared to about ten percent of adult offenders) believed the lawyer could decide to report the defendant's guilt to the court or whether to "let him go or send him up." For many juveniles, past experience with authority provides little reason for them to imagine that an adult in a professional role would take their side against other adults in a legal process. A human behavioral study conducted in 1993 showed that youths begin to develop the ability to think in terms of hypothetical situations some time in early adolescence, but it takes several more years for them to achieve their adult potential to do this, especially to use this ability in unusual and emotionally charged circumstances, such as their own legal proceedings. Overall, the developmental, social, and historical circumstances of adolescents show that their abilities to work with counsel in their defense and comprehend long term consequences are limited. In an adult court, the right to notice of charges, legal counsel, and privilege against self-incrimination are meaningless if a juvenile defendant is not capable of exercising them. To protect juveniles' rights, their defense must not be jeopardized by the defendant's incapacity, which entails not trying and punishing juveniles as adults. In the juvenile court, it can be considered justifiable to try youth despite their questionable capacities, to the extent that sentences are for a shorter time periods and rehabilitation is the focus.Posted by: AnonymousNo they should not
Imagine a younger sibling or a younger cousin of yours, curious and happy, not having a care in the world. They have not yet seen the dangers of the world. Now, picture this in your head, picture there usually happy faces are now covered with fear and a sad face. Once they were free but now they are wearing shackles around their arms and their legs, shackles to big for them, shackles meant for someone older. Shackles not meant for them. Imagine if the last time you saw your younger sibling/cousin you saw them, you see them getting escorted into a big metal cage and you watch as the door slams right in their little faces.
Posted by: Anonymousviolence can sometimes be a cry for help
Not all violent acts are that of intent. Not all violent acts by juveniles are done with the full understanding of the implications of their actions. We're all so quick to criminalise chidren rather than to look at why they are like this in the first place. Internal and external forces can play a part on jow an individual acts or reacts to a situation so couple that with immaturity, a detachment from society, and lack of parental guidance and possibly education issues or lack of and its no wonder so many young people are being locked up! Dont be so quick to judge people!
Posted by: AnonymousKids make mistakes,
They are still developing they don't know better. Versus a grown man who should already know better, he has lived, experienced, and should know the consequences. Prison is no place for kids because it can potentially ruin their thinking process. In my opinion Rehabilitation is a better option. Kids still have their whole life ahead of them , many which will learn and improve based on their mistakes and behavior.
Posted by: AnonymousNo. Because, it's nothing but an hypocrisy.
Ok. What is the legal age to drink? Twenty-one is supposedly when a person is fully developed enough to know how to handle alcohol.
What is the legal age to smoke cigarettes? Eighteen? Why? Because they will then, supposedly fully understand what that cigarette will do to their bodies. And parents don't have anymore consent over them.
What makes a victim of a pedophile (say, a 17-year-old girl) not know what she's doing? Why is it she is treated like a victimized child, until of course, she kills the man who raped her? Does this make any sense?
If you want to enforce one law or punishment, you've got to play by your own rules, as far as I'm concerned. Don't be hypocrites. It's really ugly.
A five year old should be punished like an adult?? Has any of the "yes" people actually encountered a 5 year old? They may say they know better. But, they actually don't know what consequences of murder are.Posted by: AnonymousNo, because a child should never be tried as an adult.
A child might not have the capacity to know right from wrong, given their age, upbringing, and mental state. To try a kid as an adult would be unfair, because an adult brain is different than a child's brain.
Posted by: MalikSNo
Children below 18 are for all purposes a child in many places you cannot work until 14 drive until 16 and vote until 18. If you think that one whom does not have full rights as an adult should get tried as one you are mistaken if they were to get tried as an adult they should have the right instantly to be able to vote, drive, drink(alcohol), and work.
Posted by: AnonymousCan you be serious?
As with manslaughter and pre-meditated murder, the penalties are substantially different due to the fact the circumstances are quite different as is the case with juvenile crimes. Maturity comes with experience, teaching and time. Age is not the dominant factor. We have to look at the case by case scenario. You can't just say all juveniles deserve the same penalties as adults for adult crimes.
Posted by: AnonymousNO
They should not be because it is scientifically proven that they do not have the ability to think through their actions and consequences before they act. You may argue that "Old enough to commit a crime, old enough to serve time", but juveniles are just kids who made a bad mistake. If tried in a adult court, they may even be sent in prison. As you all know, adult prisons are very harsh. It expose these young kids into hardened criminals and may corrupt them into doing crime. Statistics show that juveniles tried and prosecuted in adult courts are more likely to be released into a life of crime than those who were tried in juvenile court
Posted by: AnonymousJuveniles have not yet developed their full morality
Kids are not old enough to fully appreciate the law and their actions, many will improve in their thinking as they get older, but if they are exposed to hardened criminals in adult jails then this is less likely.
Posted by: AnonymousIt's a fact that children under 18 are not fully developed, they are not in a good state of mind to make the right decision
Some might say "doesn't matter how old, you do the crime you pay the time". I disagree, yes they should get some type of punishment but not 10 years to life that's ridiculous. So you honestly think putting them 10 years to life will make a change in their lives?
Posted by: AnonymousChildren Not Adults
Children don't have the same mental ability to be involved in a crime as the average adult. Even if it is the same crime, children should seek help, not punishment such as life imprisonment. Children are still kids, not a grown, fully developed brain, adult. We should get them help and not make them suffer even more than they are already going to go through.
Posted by: AnonymousWhy not?
teens shouldn't be treated like adults in the court of law beause in some case, the teen may or may have not done something really bad like killing a someone. the teen would probally go to jewvy and once he/she is to get out, the teen would act as if he/she had done something realy bad.the teen would feel like a criminal and therfore the teen would act like one. Another reason why teens should be treated as adults in the court of law is beacause the teens are not quite muture to be treated like a adult. the teens are still learning so they should be juged as if they were one. Troubled teens should be put in a facilty whre he/she will be treated at the proper age. They shoudn't be treat too old or too young but at their age. Eventually, as the teen gros up he/she will get more respsibilities and after, they will be able to be a normal human of the sociaty.
Posted by: AnonymousI agree
No, the justice system should not treat juvenile violent offenders as adults because its a viloation of the 8th amendment that states no cruel and unusual punishment and treating a juvenile as an adult is cruel and unusual punishment.
Posted by: AnonymousAge does matter.
As a teen, you're still developing, hormones and an under-developed brain controls a teen; logical reasoning and a fully developed brain control an adult. This is simply unfair, that a child with little experience of what is right and what is wrong, should be tried as someone who is fully understanding of their crime.
Posted by: Anonymous