Amazon.com Widgets
  • We should colonize mars

    We can have new safe place because the bad guys would stay an earth and we would stay on mars or the opposite way.And there are suppose to be water on mars but the scientist said that if it was a shoreline they would be at the sea level but the volcano can move the sea level by making mars spin excess and that would move it a few kilometers high

  • No we should not

    We already have a planet to care for and there are enough problems here .Why increase more. There is starvation, homelessness and war. If this repeats in a another planet altogether wouldn't matters get worse? What if this mission fails, the people would die and all the effort and money would go to loss,

  • Why shouldn't we?

    The sooner we start colonizing other planets the better. Earth will not be able to sustain us forever and neither will the sun. Now I'm aware we have several thousand or billion years until that whole sun swallows up earth thing and dies, but if we spend those years exploring space building technology to do so we don't have to worry about our species ever going extinct. Plus then i could be Star-Lord!

  • Ljgj fsd f

    Hjfrhshuysgfashfhdgfukjfdgsjkfdskdsvjgfvjkgfb ggy sd d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d

  • Ljgj fsd f

    Hjfrhshuysgfashfhdgfukjfdgsjkfdskdsvjgfvjkgfb ggy sd d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d

  • Ljgj fsd f

    Hjfrhshuysgfashfhdgfukjfdgsjkfdskdsvjgfvjkgfb ggy sd d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d

  • Earth gonna be extinct soon

    We re running out of resources on a big way, and climate chnages, economic stability, political stability keeps weakiening, mars is definetrly a better place, its similar to earth and lives can go on for millions of years. More efficient and a new change for humans, which is interesting much!

  • We should definetly colonize mars

    Think about the astroid that killed off the dinosaurs if another astroid hit the earth the human race would cease to excist but if we send people to mars the human race would continue to excist we should send prisoners to mars before regular citizens are sent to to die

  • We should definetly colonize mars

    Think about the astroid that killed off the dinosaurs if another astroid hit the earth the human race would cease to excist but if we send people to mars the human race would continue to excist we should send prisoners to mars before regular citizens are sent to to die

  • We should definetly colonize mars

    Think about the astroid that killed off the dinosaurs if another astroid hit the earth the human race would cease to excist but if we send people to mars the human race would continue to excist we should send prisoners to mars before regular citizens are sent to to die

  • No, no, no.

    Well, first of all, we wouldn't even be able to survive on Mars. Secondly, even if we could, we've already fûčkěđ our own planet up so much that we'd destroy Mars too. Now I am just adding more words to fill the minimum word limit. Herp a herp derp derp.

  • Colonizing mars would be a cool but,

    We should be helping save this planet we currently live on instead leaving it to suffer. Besides if we colonized mars we would have to constantly be in space suits and we if colonized mars we would look out our window and instead of seeing trees, grass, animals we would see dirt and space capsules

  • We should not

    We would spend millions of dollars and the rocket would probably blow up so all that money and time would be wasted and we would have killed a bunch of live sososoos OKOkwerier porkwjfoij sodjifoafjoj ksdjhsihdf isgdiusg asfhi uisdg suigf iaugse uiwgr iasgr gasi gsRIGGeri ieu IEG GYIEWG RI Iggri

  • No we should not

    We already have a planet to care for and there are enough problems here .Why increase more. There is starvation, homelessness and war. If this repeats in a another planet altogether wouldn't matters get worse? What if this mission fails, the people would die and all the effort and money would go to loss,

  • Save Earth instead!

    Colonizing Mars is too visionary and far fetched. It will take more than many thousands of years until Mars becomes a more suitable planet to live on than earth. By that time we will have evolved our technology so much that colonizing mars will be much easier than it is today. If anyone think that we have the resources and technology to inhabit mars we should use that to instead save earth today and focus on Mars when the technology and necessity comes.

  • No way should we colonize Mars.

    This is a really bad idea. Think about all the money that it would take to get the technology let alone if we get the technology. Think about how long it would take for the people to get to Mars. Mars's thin atmosphere how do we get a good long lasting air supply.

  • They dont have good beaches

    I like cats L l l l l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l ll l l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l ll l l l l ll l

  • They dont have good beaches

    I like cats L l l l l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l ll l l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l ll l l l l ll l

  • They dont have good beaches

    I like cats L l l l l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l ll l l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l ll l l l l ll l

  • They dont have good beaches

    I like cats L l l l l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l ll l l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l ll l l l l ll l


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
alron says2015-09-29T19:28:49.817
Mars should only be used for scientific research