Amazon.com Widgets
  • Yeah, with consequence

    Eating a sandwich has consequences too. No moral or rational being wants deadly violence, environmental degradation, or any negatively perceived thing. Kim Jong un is also not a utopian deity that has what is objectively best for the eternal multiverse in mind. That maniac has control of an entire nation of the human species that he has publicly shown to be utilized as a programmable means to a lunatics end. The solution to our global policy formula is multivariable, but we must exterminate the bs of the world first so an empire democratic global technoanarchy has a real chance to start.
    Conclusion: 2 options
    1.)destroy (easy and hard to deal with) and rebuild ( difficult and righteous)
    2.) have a logical debate and try to reason with a maniac(diplomatic)

    f diplomacy because it doesn't work without reason

    sometimes sacrifice is necessary to improve the world.
    Knowledge may be power unless you have a nut job with human capital at full disposal, and makes information inaccessible to his people. Power is power. And cowards respond to fear. So nuke the son of a bitch and unfortunately millions of innocents. If you empathize hard enough you could even feel for Kim, but cancer doesn't care. He is promising to attack and as days go by the possibility is more promising. Why wait for more innocents to die.

    Option 3.) wait for global pissing contests to stop and hope that all nations corporations and primal instincts seize to give a crap and become indifferent to one another and just exist.

  • Yes we should

    North Korea now has missiles that can hit the U.S and kill many of our citizens, you also have to think what if they just want us to think that they are waiting for us to strike first so they seem like the bigger "MAN" then they launch one out of no where killing hundreds of thousands people in the U.S. Think can we wait for them to attack first or wipe them out before they get us.

  • Yes we should

    If we nuke North Korea, then the entire world would be happy, because we'll be living in a happy post apocalyptic world. That might sound bad, but many people are playing a game called "Fallout". If this game is so popular, then people obviously want to live in a world like this.

  • They are so close to being able to attack anyone

    At the moment North Korea doesn't have a working ICBM (inter continental ballistic missile) but they have manged to do what is said to be the hardest part, getting a bomb small enough to fit on the end of the missile. They have managed to launch them into space but haven't managed to get the reentry right. Once they do they will be able to nuke anyone. This means they could attack South Korea and Japan without threat from america because they will be to scared to attack as one of there cities may get attacked. This means we should attack them now to avoid them being in that situation.

    Posted by: kit1
  • Seed the entire 38th parallel with nukes

    That act alone will make fat boy think twice about threatening Seoul by firing all his thousands of artillery pieces against Seoul. Ie., Knowing we could set off all of those A bombs (spaced about 40' feet apart) renders those artillery pieces obsolete and at the same time creates a nuclear radiation zone which will insure nobody from the north will ever be able to cross into the south for at least 300 years.

  • North Korea has already abrogated the cease fire by firing on and sinking a South Korean Ship.

    The cease fire that stopped hostilities in the 50s has already been broken by North Korea by its sinking of a South Korean ship in the recent past. What forced the cease fire in the first place was Truman's threat of dropping an atomic bomb. Since the North Koreans broke the cease fire, we should carry out the threat that caused it. This will teach the rest of the world---DO NOT BREAK TREATIES OR AGREEMENTS WITH THE USA!

  • For the greater good.

    Not the whole country, but nuke Pyongyang. Pyongyang is home to all the big shots, the fat cats, the corrupt. None of the hard-working, poverty-struck, innocent men and women living under Kim's rule would live in the capital.

    We nuke Pyongyang and we effectively take where the centralised power is, out. Maybe drop some more on actual launch sites to defeat chances of retaliation. Either way a pre-emptive nuclear strike is the best option. We don't want a repeat of the Korean War - and no South Korean should have to suffer from the North aggression.

  • A good commie is a dead commie

    Nuke those commie scum into the stone age. Communism has kill over 100 million people world wide and will continue doing so if we let it exist. We must physically remove communists, so to speak. Throwing them out of helicopters would be the ideal solution but I don't think it can scale to the size of operation needed for dealing with the DPRK. Instead we should nuke the dick off kim jong un

  • A good commie is a dead commie

    Nuke those commie scum into the stone age. Communism has kill over 100 million people world wide and will continue doing so if we let it exist. We must physically remove communists, so to speak. Throwing them out of helicopters would be the ideal solution but I don't think it can scale to the size of operation needed for dealing with the DPRK. Instead we should nuke the dick off kim jong un

  • Can't be reasoned with!

    North Korea's government and civilians can't be reasoned with. They have a ton of their soldiers right on the border ready to hit South Korea, at a moments notice. So, if North Korea's government and military were leveled by a well placed nuke at there capital, while at the same time having there troops at the border to South Korea hit with conventional bombs. We should be able to prevent any fall back on South Korea or China. Now in saying that, the experts would need to look at the topography, weather conditions, and yield of the nuke to decide the exact parameters of the attack, so as to not affect anybody outside of North Korea. In doing this, any survivors from North Korea would have no capabilities or motivation to do anything but surrender and wait for aid.

  • No, we should not nuke North Korea.

    First, they are no threat to us. They are all talk, no action. If we make the first move, we are inviting them to start a war with us. Is that what we want? We have a good standing with most of the countries, and there is no need for us to be the "bully."

  • No, because that would completely destroy our reputation.

    The world looks at Americans as aggressive bullies. Dropping a nuclear bomb on North Korea would only reinforce that image and destroy a lot of lives needlessly. There may come a time when it may be necessary to take such drastic action, but we still have a long way to go before we reach that point.

  • No, it is cruel!

    We should never use weapons of mass destruction. For starters, the fallout will affect other regions and people of the world. Secondly, the civilian casualties would be enormous. We would be killing all the people of North Korea along with their leaders. It would be a humongous catastrophe without justification!

  • Nuclear weapons would cause untold devastation in North Korea and surrounding countries.

    We should never use nuclear weapons as a preemptive strike. While there are many problems with the government of North Korea, a nuclear weapon would cause unnecessary civilian casualties and massive damage to the environment that would impact neighboring countries. While something should be done about North Korea, nukes are certainly not the answer.

  • As much as I hate to say it.

    I would cause more problems than it would solve. First thing that would have to be considered would be the fallout from a nuclear weapon. It would affect not only all of Korea (North AND South), but also possibly Japan and China. And we do NOT want to piss off China anymore than they already are. Second thing to consider is that presently North Korea is not a threat. Right now they can barely get a missile in the air. Third thing to consider is how the U.S. would be perceived by the rest of the world if we did something like that. If we proceeded with a preemptive nuclear strike without any kind of provocation, we would be seen as bullies and I fear that our reputation would suffer irreparable damage. As much as I would love to see Kim Jong Un shot out a cannon into space, nuking North Korea would ultimately be a horrible idea.

  • As much as I hate to say it.

    I would cause more problems than it would solve. First thing that would have to be considered would be the fallout from a nuclear weapon. It would affect not only all of Korea (North AND South), but also possibly Japan and China. And we do NOT want to piss off China anymore than they already are. Second thing to consider is that presently North Korea is not a threat. Right now they can barely get a missile in the air. Third thing to consider is how the U.S. would be perceived by the rest of the world if we did something like that. If we proceeded with a preemptive nuclear strike without any kind of provocation, we would be seen as bullies and I fear that our reputation would suffer irreparable damage. As much as I would love to see Kim Jong Un shot out a cannon into space, nuking North Korea would ultimately be a horrible idea.

  • As much as I hate to say it.

    I would cause more problems than it would solve. First thing that would have to be considered would be the fallout from a nuclear weapon. It would affect not only all of Korea (North AND South), but also possibly Japan and China. And we do NOT want to piss off China anymore than they already are. Second thing to consider is that presently North Korea is not a threat. Right now they can barely get a missile in the air. Third thing to consider is how the U.S. would be perceived by the rest of the world if we did something like that. If we proceeded with a preemptive nuclear strike without any kind of provocation, we would be seen as bullies and I fear that our reputation would suffer irreparable damage. As much as I would love to see Kim Jong Un shot out a cannon into space, nuking North Korea would ultimately be a horrible idea.

  • We can't kill civilians, and what about China and Russia?

    America has a notorious reputation of killing innocent civilians during war such as in Vietnam and Iraq, nuking North Korea would only add to this reputation. North Korea can't even get their crap together enough to attack us, much less nuke us first:
    http://fortune.Com/2017/04/15/north-korean-missile-launch/
    North Korea is all bark but no bite. North Korea is allied with China and Russia meaning that these countries would attack any country that attacked North Korea. China alone has the largest army in the world and Russia isn't far behind, both of these countries also have nukes they could use on us. We couldn't win a war against both China and Russia. And nuking North Korea would harm surrounding countries such as South Korea, China, Russia, and Japan (which is already suffering radiation problems) which would kill even more civilians. It would be very stupid to nuke them unless they pull off a massive attack on America, which is very unlikely given that their missiles tend to fail and they use outdated technology.

  • Use of nuclear weapons has a high probability of wiping out all life on earth.

    For the most part I disagree with our country taking unilateral interference with the rest of the world, but no one can allow nuclear weapons under the control of a madman who is willing to use them first. So I believe the answer would be a surgical strike to remove the threat.

  • Baws ples dont thats why we dont nuk people because then the end of the world would come please dont nuke them pleaseee

    Nuclear stuff would happen and people would die ahhh baws ples dont thats why we dont nuk people because then the end of the world would come and thats no fun please dont nuke them pleaseee if you do ill cry my big heart out so hard that i will d


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.