Amazon.com Widgets
  • Yeah, with consequence

    Eating a sandwich has consequences too. No moral or rational being wants deadly violence, environmental degradation, or any negatively perceived thing. Kim Jong un is also not a utopian deity that has what is objectively best for the eternal multiverse in mind. That maniac has control of an entire nation of the human species that he has publicly shown to be utilized as a programmable means to a lunatics end. The solution to our global policy formula is multivariable, but we must exterminate the bs of the world first so an empire democratic global technoanarchy has a real chance to start.
    Conclusion: 2 options
    1.)destroy (easy and hard to deal with) and rebuild ( difficult and righteous)
    2.) have a logical debate and try to reason with a maniac(diplomatic)

    f diplomacy because it doesn't work without reason

    sometimes sacrifice is necessary to improve the world.
    Knowledge may be power unless you have a nut job with human capital at full disposal, and makes information inaccessible to his people. Power is power. And cowards respond to fear. So nuke the son of a bitch and unfortunately millions of innocents. If you empathize hard enough you could even feel for Kim, but cancer doesn't care. He is promising to attack and as days go by the possibility is more promising. Why wait for more innocents to die.

    Option 3.) wait for global pissing contests to stop and hope that all nations corporations and primal instincts seize to give a crap and become indifferent to one another and just exist.

  • Yes we should

    North Korea now has missiles that can hit the U.S and kill many of our citizens, you also have to think what if they just want us to think that they are waiting for us to strike first so they seem like the bigger "MAN" then they launch one out of no where killing hundreds of thousands people in the U.S. Think can we wait for them to attack first or wipe them out before they get us.

  • Yes we should

    If we nuke North Korea, then the entire world would be happy, because we'll be living in a happy post apocalyptic world. That might sound bad, but many people are playing a game called "Fallout". If this game is so popular, then people obviously want to live in a world like this.

  • Preemptive Strike Would Save Lives

    North Korea continues to expand and modernize their nuclear arsenal. They are a country of cowards run by a madman. If we strike now we could use only a dozen or so tactical warheads and shatter their will and ability to fight. If we wait, we will take casualties and we will be forced to use massive strategic warheads in an assault. We should have no compunction about doing this, as the people of North Korea have made no efforts to change the course of their nation, they have made this inevitable.

  • H*ck yea bois

    We should do it cause Asians are ruining our countries thought them Chinese hoes be fine 👌🏾 also I head that nazi guy was Korean and he was bad😤😤 what was his name hitchler😑 Idk let's just Nuuk them also dongo trump don't like them and he is May daddy

  • H*ck yea bois

    We should do it cause Asians are ruining our countries thought them Chinese hoes be fine 👌🏾 also I head that nazi guy was Korean and he was bad😤😤 what was his name hitchler😑 Idk let's just Nuuk them also dongo trump don't like them and he is May daddy

  • H*ck yea bois

    We should do it cause Asians are ruining our countries thought them Chinese hoes be fine 👌🏾 also I head that nazi guy was Korean and he was bad😤😤 what was his name hitchler😑 Idk let's just Nuuk them also dongo trump don't like them and he is May daddy

  • H*ck yea bois

    We should do it cause Asians are ruining our countries thought them Chinese hoes be fine 👌🏾 also I head that nazi guy was Korean and he was bad😤😤 what was his name hitchler😑 Idk let's just Nuuk them also dongo trump don't like them and he is May daddy

  • H*ck yea bois

    We should do it cause Asians are ruining our countries thought them Chinese hoes be fine 👌🏾 also I head that nazi guy was Korean and he was bad😤😤 what was his name hitchler😑 Idk let's just Nuuk them also dongo trump don't like them and he is May daddy

  • H*ck yea bois

    We should do it cause Asians are ruining our countries thought them Chinese hoes be fine 👌🏾 also I head that nazi guy was Korean and he was bad😤😤 what was his name hitchler😑 Idk let's just Nuuk them also dongo trump don't like them and he is May daddy

  • No, we should not nuke North Korea.

    First, they are no threat to us. They are all talk, no action. If we make the first move, we are inviting them to start a war with us. Is that what we want? We have a good standing with most of the countries, and there is no need for us to be the "bully."

  • No, because that would completely destroy our reputation.

    The world looks at Americans as aggressive bullies. Dropping a nuclear bomb on North Korea would only reinforce that image and destroy a lot of lives needlessly. There may come a time when it may be necessary to take such drastic action, but we still have a long way to go before we reach that point.

  • No, it is cruel!

    We should never use weapons of mass destruction. For starters, the fallout will affect other regions and people of the world. Secondly, the civilian casualties would be enormous. We would be killing all the people of North Korea along with their leaders. It would be a humongous catastrophe without justification!

  • Nuclear weapons would cause untold devastation in North Korea and surrounding countries.

    We should never use nuclear weapons as a preemptive strike. While there are many problems with the government of North Korea, a nuclear weapon would cause unnecessary civilian casualties and massive damage to the environment that would impact neighboring countries. While something should be done about North Korea, nukes are certainly not the answer.

  • Use of nuclear weapons has a high probability of wiping out all life on earth.

    For the most part I disagree with our country taking unilateral interference with the rest of the world, but no one can allow nuclear weapons under the control of a madman who is willing to use them first. So I believe the answer would be a surgical strike to remove the threat.

  • Baws ples dont thats why we dont nuk people because then the end of the world would come please dont nuke them pleaseee

    Nuclear stuff would happen and people would die ahhh baws ples dont thats why we dont nuk people because then the end of the world would come and thats no fun please dont nuke them pleaseee if you do ill cry my big heart out so hard that i will d

  • Use daisy cutters

    Daisy cutters during their yearly gatherings of duck stepping would do the job. One cruise missile could fly into Jong-Un's face like he uses antiaircraft guns against his own people. We, the US, are too nice. Laws against assassinating foreign leaders. But Jong-Un's has threatened us. OK Corral shoot out!

  • You are contaminating other nations

    If you nuke north Korea, you will contaminate south korea with radiation. China will be poisoned due to winds. Japan will be contaminated due to the east sea's water. Fukushima still affects the US 4 years after the accident happened. If you bomb North korea, you will be guilty of poisoning innocent countries

  • Other countries will be affected

    The people who say yes are stupid. The US has an ally just 40 miles south of 평양. Japan's fukushima accident affects the US even 4 years after it happened. A growing economic power is just to the north of North Korea. Should the US really contaminate an ally with radiation (Japan)?


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.