Should we re-designated the benefits of marriage only towards civil unions/ domestic partnerships to better separate church and state?

Asked by: yahuaa
  • I'm Surprised We Haven't Yet

    Marriage is a religious institution which is honored by the state. Because we, as a nation, are intended to separate the concepts of church and state, it only stands to reason that marriage is purely religious, and that civil unions or domestic partnerships are the accepted and acknowledged legal bonds which should be honored.

  • I doubt anyone will be happy with it.

    Still, it'll allow the church to protect their "sanctity of marriage." As viewed by their respective deities.
    The married couple will still have to file for a civil union/ domestic partnership just like everyone else they wished to exclude from their marriage in order for the government to acknowledge such a union. Only then can those partnerships visit their loved ones in the hospital or file inheritance claims. etc. It may not be desired, but it'll be fair.

  • No responses have been submitted.

Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.