Amazon.com Widgets
  • It should be stopped

    -The human and animal anatomy differs greatly.
    -hence animal testing can give erroneous info.
    -animal testing is ineffective: 95% of cancer drugs that enter human clinical trials fail despite animal testing.
    -The food and drug administration reports that 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans.
    - This is because stress is routinely experienced in labs, negatively influences activity, hormone levels etc.
    - out of 93 dangerous drug side effects, only 19% can be predicted by animal tests.
    -there are alternatives such as human based microdosing, in-vitro technology, human-patient simulators and sophisticated computer modelling.Cheaper, faster and more accurate than animal tests.

    Hence animal testing should be stopped

  • Absolutely must stop

    It is ridiculous that humans are consistently testing other animals for selfish reasons. Just because humans are the smartest animals it doesn`t mean we treat the others like nothing. It is unjust and uncivil. That is why we must stop testing the innocent creatures before we regret it. Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllllllllllllllllyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy regret it.

    Posted by: bvc
  • We absolutely need to stop

    What gives us the right to harm these innocent creatures for our own selfish needs? Cosmetology isn't important enough that it's worth hurting animals in the process. If anything needs to be tested on animals, it's not necessary to be made. It's really as simple as that. Have some respect for the nature around you.

  • We should stop testing animal

    We should stop testing animals because we could actually damage the animals and hurt them really bad. So that we can help animals and make them not extinct . Also we can stop trying to make clothes out of them like shoes,clothes,dresses,and purses. So that's why we should stop testing animals

  • It Is A Necessary Evil

    Testing on animals, is, in a way, evil, but it is a necessary evil. Think about it, without animal testing, many human antibiotics wouldn't exist, and then we'd all be back in the Medieval Ages again, where a small scrape or scratch means your death through infection. But if we don't test on animals, are we going to start testing on humans? NO! That is even more evil, as human testing is inhumane and would be far more evil and disgusting than animal testing. It is human nature to have more sympathy for humans rather than animals, although animals deserve sympathy too. All in all, animal testing is a necessary evil.

  • Who else but rats?

    Most animal testing done in the world (legally) is done for medical and scientific progress. Anything that is more than sending a rat through a maze is going to use chemical substances on the animals to observe its effects. Maybe it's something such as giving LSD to a spider, or an experimental vaccine to a mouse. Either way, they are putting something in the body.
    Most of the time, we do this to study the brains of the animal to further understand our own, or to try and find a cure for a disease. It is pretty much impossible to study the human brain as in depth as they do animals, because no one in their right mind would agree to half of the tests, or to the wires and other stuff inserted into the body. Who else but rats?
    Who wants experimental vaccine in their body, even if testing it could save millions of lives? Who else but rats?
    My point is that it is us or them, and no one is willing to do it. Also, that killing a few hundred mice on the road to health is worth the millions of human lives saved.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.