I personally think that The proposed legislation from Obama asks Congress to approve the use of military force "to deter, disrupt, prevent and degrade the potential for future uses of chemical weapons or other weapons of mass destruction." We us strike hard with our air and naval forces and weaken the Syrian army's fighting capability.
It is the duty of the United States to use military force to stop the conflict in Syria.As a wr is a US western democracy it is upon the Us to step in when tyranny rules.The US will risk body and spirit when freedoms of innocent people are preyed upon.
If we used military force then more people would be killed everyday. Also even if we tried we would get involved with russia and china. This whole thing could result in a big war because all of our allies would help fight and so would russia's and china's allies. Word
No, I do not think that it would be a good idea for us to go over to Syria and use military force to stop what is going on. I think that they need to just settle all of their differences on there own, and that we need to stay out.
The conflict in Syria should not be handled by the United States. The US has over stepped its boundaries in many different instances with many different countries by taking military action in a situation where they did not really need to. Syria needs to handle the conflict themselves, not the United states.
The United States (US) should not intervene in the Syrian conflict with military forces on the ground! The issue in Syria is civil war among the citizens of the country and US should not interfere with rights of the combatants to resolve their differences using force. Now the US should assist in the international humanitarian response to the conflict being coordinated by the United Nations.