Amazon.com Widgets
  • O Yea wild pets need to be pets

    Wild animals can some times be injured and need help so the food can be fun fun funf fun fun fun fun of of of of of of of of of of of fo fo fo of of o f o o o o o o o o o o

    Posted by: e15
  • As you can see dogs used to be wild and we tamed them.

    Same with the cotton pickin cats that people keep. These dadburn turtles and birds were tamed to you buncha jacklegs. Thats all i have to say... Actually i have more because all these hoodlams runnin around with these iguanas and stuff on a leash dont have one dadgum problem with it and niether do i. I think that some of these animals are important to some of the morons that like tham a lot. I used to have a beetle as a pet it was very exotic and he was my best friend...

  • Because it's right

    Some wild animals should be house pets. Yes i can agree that tigers and such do not belong in a small house of kids, but some animals like the Sloth, Hedgehog, or the Bengal cats deserve a nice home. There are wild animals out there right for humans to handle.

  • Wild animals need a easier life

    We can make life easier for wild animals,wild animals don't need to kill to eat .You could train them to be better.Pets could be very lonely even with there family they have feelings just like people.They don't have to be treated differently than others just because they are animals.So yeah
    bye.

  • Wild animals need a easier life

    We can make life easier for wild animals,wild animals don't need to kill to eat .You could train them to be better.Pets could be very lonely even with there family they have feelings just like people.They don't have to be treated differently than others just because they are animals.So yeah
    bye.

  • Think of the children (the hippo children anyway)

    Lets not forget that animals kept in zoos are technically count as wild animals being used for human entertainment. Now does anyone remember the story of that hippopotamus baby who without human care wouldn't even be alive today! Why am i even having this argument! Please are you serious right now!

  • Animals in houses?

    Honestly, I think that wild animals should be kept as pets only if you have a permit and only for certain animals like snakes. I am not talking about pythons, but snakes, frogs poisonous or not, baboons or monkeys, foxes, and squirrels. People can take care of them if they're being hunted shelter and food. You cannot have tigers or lions, pythons, and killer whales to live in your house.

  • Animals in houses?

    Honestly, I think that wild animals should be kept as pets only if you have a permit and only for certain animals like snakes. I am not talking about pythons, but snakes, frogs poisonous or not, baboons or monkeys, foxes, and squirrels. People can take care of them if they're being hunted shelter and food. You cannot have tigers or lions, pythons, and killer whales to live in your house.

  • Yes We Should

    They can have great relationships with people and make families happy. Also, we can learn more about their species and possibly help them with their survival. Some species are having trouble in the wild and this can be a way to save them and learn how to keep them surviving in nature. It's just important that whoever owns them is knowledgeable about that particular animal and knows how to take care of it. Many proponents of wild animals feel that some species have a better chance of survival if they are adopted. For example the dart frog is facing a problem in the wild as its natural habitat is diminishing. Hence, if this animal is adopted, it will have a better chance of survival.

  • Yes We Should

    They can have great relationships with people and make families happy. Also, we can learn more about their species and possibly help them with their survival. Some species are having trouble in the wild and this can be a way to save them and learn how to keep them surviving in nature. It's just important that whoever owns them is knowledgeable about that particular animal and knows how to take care of it.

  • No they should not they should be left to their own well being.

    Animals shouldn’t have to be forced to live in enclosed areas, they should be aloud to roam free and live in their way of living without any disturbance from the human society. Keeping animals out of the wild is so cruel and isolating. The animals should stay where they are and be able to have their own choices in life just like we do.

  • No they are meant to be free

    There are many reasons wild animals shouldn't be kept as pets. One captivity is not good for them and need space to roam. Also if you love them why change them? They are wild don't tame them 😡 it wrong! They also are known to carry rabies. They can also kill you!!!!!O.O A bobcat chewed off part of its leg because the owner left. Its painful for them

  • I think...NO wild animals should not be kept as pets

    Wild animals shouldn't be kept as wild animals because they can be very mean...And bite. They are also known to carry rabies. Remember that pup you never got, you might wanna tame a wolf, well they can kill you. Unless you are VERY SMART and responsible then don't they will kill you. Even a bobcat can harm you. And not all shots can treat them. As much as i love wolves and other wild animals, they belong in the wild and should be able to roam freely. If you care for them take my word, DON'T keep a wild animal as a pet. They are not meant to be like regular cats and dogs

  • I think...NO wild animals should not be kept as pets

    Wild animals shouldn't be kept as wild animals because they can be very mean...And bite. They are also known to carry rabies. Remember that pup you never got, you might wanna tame a wolf, well they can kill you. Unless you are VERY SMART and responsible then don't they will kill you. Even a bobcat can harm you. And not all shots can treat them. As much as i love wolves and other wild animals, they belong in the wild and should be able to roam freely. If you care for them take my word, DON'T keep a wild animal as a pet. They are not meant to be like regular cats and dogs

  • NO! Wild Animals Should Stay in the Wild

    Most animals are dangerous such as pythons and lions. They are also illegal to own one. When they grow older they start to get really aggressive and they will start to bite, scratch, and tear up your furniture. Once there was an owner who loved her snake. Suddenly the snake started to stop eating. It would sleep right next to the owner. The owner got scared and went to the vet and the vet said: " Your snake is getting ready to eat you". So that is another reason for why you don't want a wild pet. Last but not least they can spread diseases. The pets that we usually get have gotten their shots but a wild animal would not have therefore it can spread diseases. So this is why I think that you should not have a wild animal.

  • Wild animals should be a pet.

    Wild animals should be a pet because you don't know what happens when they once are your pets and then the second you leave them at it the wild.U can just see them dead. Because when you have a pet you can't let him or her go back out in the wild.Or then they won't know what to do because there owner was all ways there.So it is aye yes and no question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Wild animals spread disease:

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention discourages direct contact with wild animals for a simple reason: They can carry diseases that are dangerous to people, such as rabies, herpes B virus, and Salmonella. Tens of thousands of people get Salmonella infections each year from reptiles or amphibians, causing the CDC to recommend that these animals be kept out of homes with children under five. A 2003 outbreak of monkeypox was set in motion when African rodents carrying the disease were imported for the pet trade and infected native prairie dogs, who were also sold as pets. Read more at: http://m.humanesociety.org/issues/exotic_pets/facts/

  • Wild animals spread disease:

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention discourages direct contact with wild animals for a simple reason: They can carry diseases that are dangerous to people, such as rabies, herpes B virus, and Salmonella. Tens of thousands of people get Salmonella infections each year from reptiles or amphibians, causing the CDC to recommend that these animals be kept out of homes with children under five. A 2003 outbreak of monkeypox was set in motion when African rodents carrying the disease were imported for the pet trade and infected native prairie dogs, who were also sold as pets. Read more at: http://m.humanesociety.org/issues/exotic_pets/facts/

  • No, I disagree with allowing wild animals in homes.

    I know dogs\cats use to be wild animals, but that's over generations of reactions in different ways. They weren't born, with leashes and a sliver plate under their head's. They humans need to take that blame. That is why I believe wild animals need to stay in their home areas. Thank you for your time. Helen Chailn

  • Animals need to live longer

    They die soner then when out in the wild and they might be lonly too. They might need to play around or hunt while you are gone a distroy your house so know you shoulld belive me that wild animals need there space and are pretty deadly so yeah bye.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.