Amazon.com Widgets
  • We just can.

    I am a young women in high school and I chose this topic for my semester research paper. I am no screaming liberal and feminist but i cannot ignore these acts of blatant sexism. One gender is arbitrary in the military, especially in today modern world, where there are risks everywhere in every position !!

  • No they shouldnt

    Wemon are built differently if someone were to get injured that was close to you would you want I don't know Nicki Minaj pulling them off the field no she would not be strong enough to do it quickly you would want a stronger person a male women are not fit for this

  • YES women have the right to serve their women just like men.

    Women have every right to fight for her people and land, she has every right to stand up for whats hers, now BS like men are physically more stronger than women is right but lets be honest since when do we actually fight wars which need only physical defense? There's plan making, organisation, troops movement and whatnot, now y'all need to know that women are better in these stuff than women. So in the end i think in unity there's power so when men ad women stand side by side to defend their i believe nothing can beat it.

  • If they are physically and mentally strong enough.

    Yes. If a women is physically and mentally fit to join the military, then who's to stop her? If its been her all life dream to serve her country, then why would ignorant men not allow it? Yes, overall women are generally weaker in the muscle, but not in the brain. Women can come up with excellent ideas on how to do certain things.

    (The men who think women shouldn't be in the military still think they are in the dark ages.)

  • What is this?

    Seriously women in the military should be allowed, but not in combat. They will just be casualties in a real war scenario. We haven't been in a real nation vs nation war in a while. Insurgent terrorist are just not the same thing as a developed nation's highly trained military personnel. Oh well though, it's here now and our society's men are a lot like women in most cities and liberal areas anyways. We'll only live and learn. Putin might have another world war planned out and we'll answer all of these questions then. There's a reason women never joined other wars. There's reasons for a lot of things in this life that people are just recently "debunking" and acting like their new answers are better than ones that have been passed down. There's a reason people think and say the same things throughout time....It's called the truth. And it hurts.

  • Yes of course

    Haha we'll see when we have a real war on our hands....Not just chasing camel jockeys around the desert and calling it war. I believe if they want to, they can, but they need to be required to sign up for conscription also. ^^^Dude said women are smarter and more stable than men...Maybe boys and young men, but not fully developed men. C'mon guy don't play down men you "sexist."

  • Yes yes yes

    Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes

  • Equal rights = equal responsibilities

    Since today women are supposed to be equal with men then they should serve in the army just as men . I do not just believe that women should be allowed in the army i believe it should be mandatory for women to join the army end of the story

  • Women are sometimes stronger and smarter than men.

    I think women should be allowed to serve in the military because since the begging of time, women have always been smarter, and more stable than most men. Honestly, without women, the world fall apart in men's hands. Therefor, the world and military need women because of their strong role in the nation today.

  • Yes they should

    Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes ye sye sye sye yes yes ye sye sye sye sy eys eys eyeye r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r yes yes

  • No they shouldnt

    Wemon are built differently if someone were to get injured that was close to you would you want I don't know Nicki Minaj pulling them off the field no she would not be strong enough to do it quickly you would want a stronger person a male women are not fit for this

  • Women are not fit for the role.

    Okay to be honest, Women are not stronger than men. Women will never be like man and that's the truth. Women are not fir for the job and no matter what other people say, we all know that women and men are different. This is only causing more war casualties, more distraction and more deaths. Sad to say it but it's true. Sorry. Period.

  • If it hurts combat effectiveness then no.

    I'm disappointed that the other side consists of a lot of accusations instead of arguments.

    Look, it's fact that women don't have the muscular strength of men. It takes longer to train them, and they can make men emotionally compromised. A lover dying hurts more then a friend, that pain can distract you and on the battlefield that means death. Pregnancy is also an issue, if you replace players before, the big game how can you expect them to win? And a pregnant women is not a great soldier.

  • If it hurts combat effectiveness then no.

    I'm disappointed that the other side consists of a lot of accusations instead of arguments.

    Look, it's fact that women don't have the muscular strength of men. It takes longer to train them, and they can make men emotionally compromised. A lover dying hurts more then a friend, that pain can distract you and on the battlefield that means death. Pregnancy is also an issue, if you replace players before, the big game how can you expect them to win? And a pregnant women is not a great soldier.

  • We just can't.

    Women simply cannot serve in the military of we want to win. We need them to stay home, take care of the family and work in the factories so we can win the war. This strong cooperative helped us win WWII. I say women in the factory and men on the battle field.

  • We just can't.

    Women are built differently, they can't carry as much things (Gear.) as men can do, yes, they may be smarter, but that dosen't solve anything. Relationships start, and.. You know what happens. They can't leave their children behind! Most of the websites i have seen, everyone has good reasons why not.

  • We just can't.

    Women are built differently, they can't carry as much things (Gear.) as men can do, yes, they may be smarter, but that dosen't solve anything. Relationships start, and.. You know what happens. They can't leave their children behind! Most of the websites i have seen, everyone has good reasons why not.

  • Women Will be In Danger

    This is. It about sexism, this is about safety. Our women can endure more than men, but women are also distractions in the military, the men need to step up to their job. Has our nation sunk so low that we are willing to send our daughters and young mothers into battle?

  • Serving with killers?

    You expect women to serve in the Army, the only place in society where murder Is not only sanctioned but welcomed? Do You realize th├Ęse people are taught to kill for a living? With all the sexual assault on women in the Army That happens nowadays do You really think people whose profession and purpose it is to fight Can resist That urge? You Guys are crazy.

  • Only if we WANT them to die.

    The average man is four times stronger than the average woman, has thicker blood because he doesn't bleed every month, is bigger so that bigger wounds are necessary to kill him, is psychologically consistent, and has a higher capacity for speed and muscle memory. The argument that strength is no longer essential in the military is just dead wrong: even helicopter pilots can find themselves in life or death hand to hand combat. G.I. Jane is going to lose that one every time. Equality is not a concern when people are being torn apart, burned or pushed to killing themselves. War is not pretty, and no amount of makeup will change that. The arguments for women fighting are ideological whereas the ones against their serving are based in biological fact. That should say everything that needs to be said. On top of that, a military without sex is simpler, and subsequently more efficient. I don't want my squadmate doing something stupid because his girlfriend is in trouble. Anyone who has actually fought for any length of time will tell you that they'd rather have another man fighting by their side. In loo of combat experience, any education on the matter should lead one tocome to the same conclusion.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.