Amazon.com Widgets

The UN should be preserved and supported by nations.

Asked by: ReidingIt
  • The UN should be preserved and supported.

    The UN should not be dissolved as it remains the best forum for achieving peace on a global scale, despite being ineffective a concerning amount of the time. The main problem the UN faces is its inability to consistently compromise, which very much stems from its outdated framework. The two main organs that comprise the UN are the General Assembly and the Security Council. The Security Council is comprised of five permanent members (the P5) and a board of ten temporary members, who are elected every 5 years. The P5 were chosen just after WWII came to a close, and have the power to veto whatever, whenever, meaning that the fate of resolutions has thus been in the hands of the same five member states (with the exception of temporary members of the Security Council) since the establishment of the UN. It is no longer 1945 and Europe is no longer in shambles. Present day conflicts are the most prevalent in the Middle East, Africa, and Southeast Asia, none of which have permanent representation on the Security Council.

    On the contrary, the UN is rather effective in its other missions to develop underdeveloped parts of the world and advocate for human rights.

  • The UN has worked tirelessly to achieve quality education for all, and they integrate human rights into societies.

    Education plays a vital role in the advancement of economies, the development of citizens, and therefore it can prevent conflicts by ensuring societies function appropriately. Earlier this decade, the UNDP celebrated successes, with a 50% drop in the number of children out of school. They have organized international conferences that reinforce declarations of human rights with plans of actions. UNICEF organised the World Summit for Children in 1990 to encourage countries to create international policies.

  • The Best forum for peace.

    Dear all, the fellow debate is about whether or not the united nations should be dissolved or not. If we were to dissolve the U.N. what would we do if there is a civil war in Switzerland? How are we going to enforce peace?

    How will the crisis in Syria be solved if we hypothetical got rid of the united nations?

    Over the past century, there are a lot of conflicts that have been both prevented and solved thanks to the united nations here in Geneva. If we were to disband it how would it benefit people around the world?

    The United Nations has had a positive a lot of people learn more about being multicultural, by learning about how many member states there are including the events that keep you informed about how the United Nations is helping the world. By providing peace.

  • Reject conspiracy theories.

    Having reviewed the arguments from the previous debate that called for the dissolution of the UN the International Relations class from Ecolint, Nations in Geneve, Switzerland was surprised at the prevalence of conspiracy theories and high level of ignorance of the form and functions of the UN. See below for more arguments.

  • Despite it's flaws the UN has the potential to be the best forum to achieve peace in the world.

    The UN has been the stepping stones in establishing human rights and endorsing them at an international level. The UN has developed the modern concepts of human rights created international law which prohibits government to break said laws. Furthermore the UN failures aren’t due to the actual entity of the UN but in fact international community’s lack of involvement. Granted the UN is not a perfect system and is far from the endless peace creating forum we would all want, there are plenty of aspects which are in need of a desperate reformation- veto power system which is an unfair division of power, corrupt nations such as Saudi Arabia as members of the human rights council. Nevertheless to dissolve the UN without any other system to replace it would be completely redundant as we would be dismantling the only diplomatic system put in place to establish international peace and fight for human rights. With proper reformations it has the potential to be the best forum to achieve peace in the world.

  • The UN has saved countless lives in the past and avoided a lot of tragedies / catastrophes

    Considering the UN has saved countless lives in the past, whether it is by avoiding the third world war or by simply finding a consensus within its member state. The UN should not be dissolved because if that were to happen nothing could stop a third world war or another major conflict to break lose. Although the UN has had its fails it is still the only organisation stopping the world from crumbling into war and despair. Counting the numerous successes that the UN has achieved such as ending famine in some countries saving countless lives, it should be rewarded not dissolved. By 2030 the UN promises the extinction of extreme poverty in the world, dissolving the UN would mean not giving it the chance to prove itself even further than it already has.

  • Imperfect but Works

    The United Nations is an intergovernmental organization tasked to promote international cooperation and to create and maintain international order. It grew from the disasters that was the WW2 and ever since, we have yet to face another war on a global scale.

    The initial target was always to stem conflict from getting out of hand. Prior to the UN, there were organizations and conferences formed to regulate conflict, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross and the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907. We had the League of Nations that stemmed from WW1 via the Paris Peace Conference. This league lacked representation for colonial peoples and significant participation from several major powers, including the US, USSR, Germany and Japan. It failed to act against the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931, the Second Italo-Ethiopian War in 1935, the Japanese invasion of China in 1937 and German expansions under Adolf Hitler that culminated in the Second World War. Learning from these mistakes, the United Nations has risen from the ashes to control conflict more effectively.

    Peacekeeping efforts have failed in many fronts, the mediation in conflicts such as in the Middle East, Vietnam and Kashmir were ineffective. Additionally, the UN was weak during the cold war as the two major members, Soviet Union and the United States were increasingly hostile to one another. Nonetheless, the lack of a united nations is without a doubt better than no such organization. The "Blue Helmets" have been essential in enforcing terms of peace agreements in many countries and to discourage combatants from resuming hostilities. A Human Security Report documented a decline in the number of wars, genocides and human rights abuses since the end of the Cold War, a big part to do with the peacekeeping efforts of the UN.

    While the UN is limited in holding countries to adhere to the declaration, they lack any real physical power, their principles have been a guiding light or many countries. Even today, countries like the North Korea are widely known to be committing human rights atrocities. Nonetheless the UN has spearheaded the idea of human rights, which impacts policy making in many major countries and sometimes directly/indirectly leads to sanctions, as seen in the case of North Korea. Giving significant incentives to rectify their behavior.

    Additionally, the role of UN goes beyond peacekeeping, security, human rights and economic development. These include the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Food and Agricultural Organization, UNESCO, World Bank and the World Health Organization. All these play a big part in bettering our lives, such as the mass vaccination programme (through WHO), the avoidance of famine and manultrition (through the World Food Programme) and the protection of vulnerable and displaced people (via UNHCR).

    The United Nations might lack real power, but they have a gone long way in bettering our lives in so many different ways. From its initial goal to regulate conflict, it has grown to an international behemoth that helps those in need where it can.

  • The United Nations

    Although the United Nations is not a perfect medium for achieving peace, it is the closest and one of the only attempts that humankind has made towards promoting and achieving world peace collaboratively. Nonetheless, the UN is not perfect, and numerous alterations are necessary in order for the it to become increasingly efficient and effective.

  • The UN should be preserved and supported

    The UN should not be dissolved as it remains the best forum for achieving peace on a global scale, despite being ineffective a concerning amount of the time. The main problem the UN faces is its inability to consistently compromise, which very much stems from its outdated framework. The two main organs that comprise the UN are the General Assembly and the Security Council. The Security Council is comprised of five permanent members (the P5) and a board of ten temporary members, who are elected every 5 years. The P5 were chosen just after WWII came to a close, and have the power to veto whatever, whenever, meaning that the fate of resolutions has thus been in the hands of the same five member states (with the exception of temporary members of the Security Council) since the establishment of the UN. It is no longer 1945 and Europe is no longer in shambles. Present day conflicts are the most prevalent in the Middle East, Africa, and Southeast Asia, none of which have permanent representation on the Security Council.

    On the contrary, the UN is rather effective in its other missions to develop underdeveloped parts of the world and advocate for human rights.

  • The UN is a good role model for future organizations.

    The UN falls apart after many attempts and a lot of effort, but at least it is one of the only organizations who has been trying to do the difficult job of getting countries together to come to some kind of agreement for achieving peace. The UN has great goals and ambitions, but it needs to rethink their strategies and tactics to achieve them such as how the organization itself works as well as their actions.

  • Dissolve the United Nations

    The United Nations is an international group that claims to be necessary, but is, in reality, is a group that can be replaced by isolationism and charity. If you want to prevent war, the countries can resolve it themselves. If there is a world war, the UN could be used, but only as a temporary measure, because that is what the UN should be, a temporary measure. You could mention foreign aid, but that can be done through charity. Also, while the conspiracy theories are fake, it would be wise to make sure they stay fake.

  • Dissolve the United Nations

    The United Nations is an international group that claims to be necessary, but is, in reality, is a group that can be replaced by isolationism and charity. If you want to prevent war, the countries can resolve it themselves. If there is a world war, the UN could be used, but only as a temporary measure, because that is what the UN should be, a temporary measure. You could mention foreign aid, but that can be done through charity. Also, while the conspiracy theories are fake, it would be wise to make sure they stay fake.

  • Dissolving the United Nations is an absolutely horrendous idea which will have severe repercussions

    The mere notion that the UN must be abolished is asinine to the highest degree. Though the UN have been involved in numerous major failure due to their lack of decisiveness, this is to be expected of an organisation which is comprised of 193 autonomous nations which must be heard. Despite what you hear in the news, we live in by far the most peaceful period in human history, with the number of conflict-related death decreasing consistently since 1945, and this is because of the work of the UN regarding conflict resolution.

    Firstly, the UN has facilitated the eradication of disease such as Polio and Smallpox through vaccination programmes. Before the development of the smallpox vaccine, 300 million people died from smallpox in the 1900-1977.

    In addition, despite the world being on the verge of a nuclear war throughout most of the latter half of the 20th century, such an event has been prevent due to the UN's work regarding nuclear non-proliferation and conflict mediation between the US and USSR.

    Thirdly, dissolving the UN is akin to dissolving a health service. Despite the fact the UN has been accused of inefficiency, and has failed many times, it would absurd to abolish such an indispensable framework.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.