Amazon.com Widgets

This House believes that juries should be abolished in criminal trials.

Asked by: Savourymuffin123
  • Yes we should

    Juries are people. Don't you know that? People are always biased in some ways including those people. That way the judgement may be very unfair since opinions from the juries are considered to it. Because of bribes and every problems in the society, isn't it so true that that juries shouldn't be in the court? Therefore, I strongly believe that juries should be abolished in criminal trials.

  • J j j

    H g f d cd ca dm md m dm m cm dc m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m x x xx x x x x x x x x x z \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

  • , kkkkk j

    K j n j h g v g v gh y g h h g hb h h b h g g h h h b b hg g s x a a x \xiwqfdiqfiew fe f eiw fiew f wew fe f e few fh ewi fi fqe f eif eiaq

  • Juries are abolished

    Bruh they change minds quickly in a trial and if the witness is crying they might cry and not say that the criminal did nothing but that he is evel and did something bad.And they are not used to bringing criminals in jail while judjes are used to it. Bruh

  • Jury service can be a stressful process.

    It is not only in the interest of fairness for the defendant that trial by Jury should be abolished but also for the mental of the Jury members. In cases of serious/violent crimes the Jurors can be threatened by family members of the criminal which is very distressing. Therefore Jury members are sometimes given police protection however this impacts on family life and involves innocent people in stressful work with which they should not need to be bothered.

  • The final decision may not be fair.

    Juries can be very biased and far too easily influenced. I do not think juries are necessarily always bad and that thy should be banned however. For criminal trials, though, they can be way too biased.
    Or maybe, with twelve in the jury, there could be seven with one decision and the other five with a different decision.

    I am not too sure about the topic - the motion is for a future debate - so please let me know your opinions.

  • Jury service can be a stressful process.

    It is not only in the interest of fairness for the defendant that trial by Jury should be abolished but also for the mental of the Jury members. In cases of serious/violent crimes the Jurors can be threatened by family members of the criminal which is very distressing. Therefore Jury members are sometimes given police protection however this impacts on family life and involves innocent people in stressful work with which they should not need to be bothered.

  • A jury of peers is essential to the balance of power

    Juries can be biased thats why the selection system is so strict but the system can also be just biased.
    The reason juries are essential is because the decision should be multisource. The defense and prosecution give their case. Then you get different interpretations from all members while theyre discussing the case. This makes it less biased not more.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.