Amazon.com Widgets

Upper oceanic heat transport: Should we risk the health of our oceans in order to try and end global warming?

  • The chineses baes

    Chinese are the masters of global warming and the koreans are lickers and the germans are jew killers and the mexicans are big poor trump haters and hawaians ae bae and the africans are bbc's that run around nude like wierd asses. And most of all EUROPEIANS ARE FUCKING BAE

  • Hose is global warmth

    Hose is my favorite person in the entire world and is better than you and all of your friends combined!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you think you can beat him at something, well you cant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He will be warming the globe forever and there is nothing that you can do about it!!!!!!!!!! He is god's brother!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Chinee are baes

    The chineses baes Chinese are the masters of global warming and the koreans are lickers and the germans are jew killers and the mexicans are big poor trump haters and hawaians ae bae and the africans are bbc's that run around nude like wierd asses. And most of all EUROPEIANS ARE FUCKING BAE

  • Desecrating Oceans Will Not Solve Global Climate Change

    No, we should not risk the health of our oceans in order to try and end global warming. There is little reason to cause another global climate crisis while attempting to stop another one. Shooting ourselves in the foor in order to fix the problem of global warming would solve nothing.

  • Global Warming Won't End Due to Oceanic Heat Transport

    Oceanic Heat Transport could help dissipate the effects of global warming but at a great cost. OHT would damage our world's oceans in various ways without actually defeating global warming. There's no reason we should harm our oceans for a slight reduction in warming, especially because some degree of global warming is naturally occurring.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.