Amazon.com Widgets

Upskirting: Should a person who looks up a woman's skirt in public spend 5 years in prison?

  • Yes They Should

    Yes, I believe that they should because, it is an intentional act! A grown man looking up a Girls skirt in public is just wrong! Also it could possibly be counted as sexual offense. So this is my reasoning that Prople that do that, Should be put in jail for AT LEAST 5 Years.

  • Yes. In-fact, just give the number of years to rise.

    Upskirting is a very sexist thing to do. IT should be punished with AT LEAST 10-20 years of prison. Sexual harassers SHOULD NOT be let off with a 10 year sentence. This should not become a state law, it should become a national law so that it is equal, and not patchy.

  • It's an intentional act.

    Yes, a person who looks up a woman's skirt in public should spend 5 years in prison, because the person who decides to do something like that does it intentionally. That is much worse than hurting someone carelessly. Rather, a person chooses to invade another person's privacy on purpose. 5 years in prison would be fair.

  • Yes, people should be punished for voyeurism.

    People should definitely be punished for voyeurism of any type, and some states (including California and Ohio) have laws about what's been deemed "upskirting," since it's become epidemic. It's especially upsetting if the person committing the act has a video camera, which means that the victim is being filmed without permission, and the video might be shared online (since there are sites devoted to this). More states should enact laws about this.

  • Depends on the scenario

    If the person physically touched the woman or her skirt, then five years in prison is easily justifiable. No one should have their hands on a lady's skirt or her legs.

    If this was a young adult (15-20-ish), and there was no touching, five years in jail would probably screw them up even more. Younger people are still kind of mold-able... Have them pay a big fine. Spend a night in jail. Given that it's a first offence. If it's a second offense of the same nature, then as someone else mentioned, I'd like to see them go to a rehabilitation program.

  • No, although offensive, it isn't serious.

    Think about the amount of space left in prisons. This is an extremely minor crime. We should be saving room in prisons for murderers and rapist, not perverts who may not have even actually touched the person. Instead, charge them a hefty price. 5 years is an unfair amount of time.

  • Too long for looking up a skirt

    Looking up a woman's skirt is, as someone else said, a violation of women's personal space. Though five years in prison is too much for such a minor crime. Maybe some financial charges (and a slap on their face for their pervertness), but not five years. Five years should be for the actual criminals (drugs or attempted rape) But, if it leads to a serious sex offense, then they deserve much more than five years in prison.

  • Depends on the scenario

    If the person physically touched the woman or her skirt, then five years in prison is easily justifiable. No one should have their hands on a lady's skirt or her legs.

    If this was a young adult (15-20-ish), and there was no touching, five years in jail would probably screw them up even more. Younger people are still kind of mold-able... Have them pay a big fine. Spend a night in jail. Given that it's a first offence. If it's a second offense of the same nature, then as someone else mentioned, I'd like to see them go to a rehabilitation program.

  • Way too much time.

    5 years is a serious sentence, in the territory of involuntary manslaughter, aggravated sexual assault, and assault with a deadly weapon. This crime deserves a fine, probation, maybe some time, and possibly classification as a sex offender if repeated.

    Otherwise, it is not "much worse than hurting someone carelessly" and does not deserve a sentence equal to involuntary manslaughter

  • Punished? Of course.

    I simply think that 5 years is too much. I believe that there should definitely be punishment for this act, but for what reason can you justify it being 5 years in prison? That is way too much of a punishment for the crime... Need to fill the space up.

  • No, but they should definitely still be punished

    Looking up a woman's skirt is definitely a violation of her body and her personal space, but five years seems a little excessive - Particularly if this is a first time offense. It's expensive to keep people in prison, and I would much prefer to see them participate in a rehabilitation program and then resume being a contributing member of society. On the other hand, if it is part of a pattern of sexual offenses, they should definitely be locked up for the safety of the public.

  • No, a person who looks up a woman's skirt should not spend 5 years in prison

    No, a person who looks up a woman's skirt should not spend 5 years in prison. Five years in prison is too much for this kind of offence. Although a short term in prison such as a few days and a large fine should be enforced in order to deter the lewd behavior from occurring again.

  • Simply disproportionate for what is mostly antisocial behaviour

    Surely this comes on the back of the new culture of taking extreme offence at anything and everything . What comes next? Staring at cleavage? Women scandalising teenage boys with inappropriate clothing?

    If there is any intimidation or physical violence it must be punished else a prison sentence is simply disproportionate

  • Prison creates criminals

    Who are these people, hiding behind their anonymity, who advocate 5-20 years jail time?
    That’s the sort of sentence a rapist would get.
    Must one therefore conclude that a voyeur, who commits a crime in which the victim’s identity is Unknown, is deserving of the same sentence as a rapist?
    Are we suddenly back in the Middle Ages?
    Community service would be a commensurate punishment.

  • If opportunity is given, then no harm.

    In general, no, if someone chooses to dress in a manner that makes it possible to see their underwear, then what's being photographed is not private. So many people today play the victim after their own complicity it what transpires. The obvious limit is if a perpetrator touches person or clothing.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.