George W. Bush, a man who owned oil companies in Texas, needed a drastic excuse to preserve his industry's interests in the Middle East. The terrorist attacks of 9/11 were completely preventable. How in the heck were four planes hijacked without anyone in the CIA knowing about it beforehand? Give me a break. Yokels from the Middle East couldn't pull of such a thing without help. Religious despots may have been well-funded, but they weren't that smart. People give the terrorists WAY too much credit.
I really hate to have to sit here and say that our country would do such a thing but I tend to think now that it was done for purposes beyond the average Americans understanding. We as a Nation needed to do such a thing to get fellow Americans to back the Original War on Terrorism. We also needed to do it so we could be in that part of the country where there was huge amounts of Oil of which us and other nations needed. I feel that strongly that by America doing this it has allowed for other Nations not only to get Oil at better prices, but has allowed for those countries to in return continue to Buy Our DEBT! It is sad to say that we killed our own Americans for such a reason, but if this was not done we may be in a worse mess than we are now.
All the building fell on its footprint straight down through maximum resistance in almost freefall speed. US attacked Afganistan without valid proof of Osama being involved in it. There were no evidence of airplane crash on any sight black box was not recovered from any of the sight. Why in hell US government had to release only one tape in pentagon attack when the have got security camera from 85 different angles which would have proved their innocence.
Plunder from Iraq and Afghanistan and other places. And that new tower that, had it been proposed in an office, would've inspired an impassioned strike from workers who were fine exercising their jobs within the old time-y towers.
Even if the government didn't plan the attack, they pray everyday for the gods of rain to send a terrorist attack so they can have their ticket for oversees domination and convince the stupid masses to support them because they are in "danger".
But yeah the US government did it, 100%. New York is the capital city of Earth, the center of many political, military, economic powers, yet not even one air section was in the sky to police the rogue aircrafts. NORAD are either a bunch of pussies or downright stupid.
Finally, even if the government wasn't behind it, it's our responsibility to question them and to never fully trust them. Their job is to SERVE the public, that's what they are, servants. We are their masters, and we should always humble them and keep them on their toes, so they get the job done, which they do if and only if it makes their pockets fatter. Much safer to suspect them and be wrong than to trust them and be wrong, at least then we die with honor.
So naive, to blindly trust MEN in power, who have raped the Earth on so many occasions. Especially American men of war, since they are inherently, since the beginning of their "country", terrorists.
In the words of Master Chief Douche-bag 1st Class, Ole Herm:
"The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country."
Research the "operation north woods" document. This is was a proposal to kill our own people and fabricate evidence to make it look like Cuba did it during the Cold War in the 60s by the United States government. It goes into detail on how they would fake airline hijackings with drones painted as airlines. It's similar to what many believe happened on 911. The only difference is its with the Middle East and not Cuba. Keep in mind this proposal was approved by the Central Intelligence Agency so it was not just a couple of goons in the government. The Kennedy administration threw the proposal down. Unfortunately Kennedy was killed a year later.
I've been to New York, and seen the recordings of 9/11. How come you can't see the stars in the 9/11 recordings? Because it was filmed hastily on a sound stage to make the 9/11 deadline. And who recorded 9/11? What idiot wouldn't be running? 9/11 was one of the worst false flags ever and if anyone believes it they are sheeple.
Look at the destruction of evidence: WTC plane black boxes - never recovered according to the 9/11 commission. Only time ever indestructible boxes not found but hijacker passport found on ground in lower Manhattan. NORAD - NEADS key tape 'accidentally' dmaged while being transcribed. Secret service logs about when Cheny brought to bunker - destroyed. And there's more
Yes it was because Lizard people did it. I saw a Youtube video once that had this really suspensful music and it said that Lizard People planned this a thousand years ago and that it would happen. I hope people wake up one day and stop being sheeps and believing everything they are told from the mainstream media.
On 9/11 and 7/7 there just happened to be "training exercises" being carried out that in both cases were replicating what was actually happening in real life as to divert people away from what was actually happening.At the core of the 9/11 Truther movement is the idea that the government staged the attacks to drum up support for a war. So much Truther evidence is laughable that it's easy to dismiss the idea, but there exists a chilling reminder that the U.S. military was once all-too-willing to deceive and attack its own citizens for political reasons. That was the goal of Operation Northwoods.
The US government needed an excuse to go to war, and as other people have said, how was it possible for the CIA to know nothing. And then there was the early warnings such as the one they had on BBC news that WTC7 collapsed. Yet it was still there.
While yes the government does some questionable things to people in other countries, tortured terrorists and such. How anyone came to the conclusion that they orchestrated the killing and destruction of American property and people "to get Americans to back the Original War on Terrorism" is beyond me. So no 9/11 was not an inside job.
Anybody that even briefly entertains the notion that this may have been an act that the United States was at any level intending to happen really needs to seek help. Even if you're willing to go out on a limb of such insanity, the government could have easily performed a similar act of horror without the body count that came with this. There's absolutely nothing that makes it logical to think this was an inside job and as you can see to my left the only reasons being thrown out there are being sensationalized to a downright offensive level.
To suggest that the September 11 2001 attacks were some kind of "inside" job is unbelievably paranoid. There is no possible motivation sufficient to warrant the mass murder of thousands of American citizens that would justify any inside action. September 11 was not the result of an inside terrorist operation.
Please tell me this isnt real? Our government may be corrupt at times but this notion cannot be real. I have faith that most people put into office are trying to do the right thing. And besides there is no evidence to support it plain and simple. Matter of fact why don't we debate whether or not aliens have landed on earth while we are at it.
Why on earth would the government murder so many people. It's kind of disrespectful to go around talking about "9/11" like it's just some date on which an event occurred that causes a lot of conversation. Real people died and real people were affected. Real people work in the government that have kids, and eat breakfast, and sleep at night, and talk to their friends. Why on earth would the government as a whole cause such a terrible attack to happen?
2,753 people died ya we are going to kill our own people yes we wanted in on the war but if we are going to lose that many people trying to why bother 8 months and 19 days to clean it all up and the WTC7 report by the FEMA said that there was relatively light damage to WTC7 prior to it's collapse with the benefit of more time 3 resoures NIST reseacher now support the working hypothesis that WTC7 was farmore compromiesed by falling debris
SO HE BLOWS UP 3000 AMERICANS?? GO AND REVISE YOUR FACTS BECAUSE YOU REALLY DON'T UNDERSTAND POLITICS OR HUMANS FOR THAT MATTER.
1) The steel bars did not melt, and we all know that those temperatures couldn't have melted it, so it was the weight of all the people and building above the impact zone that eventually brought it down, as the framings gave way.
2) These 'controlled demolitions' you speak of, are false. There was huge explosion like blows through windows during the collapse, but this is because as the building collapsed, all the air was pushed downwards, increasing air pressure and resulting in windows blowing out and gusts of air and dust exploding out. NOT A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, JUST AIR PRESSURE.
With an extraordinary phenomenon on the scale of 9/11 there will always be details that cannot be easily explained, if at all. What conspiracy theorists do is they take these unexplained details and create a story to "fit the facts", but without any real positive corroborating evidence. This is akin to the Texas Sharpshooter's fallacy, where by the texan shoots the side of a barn with a gun, and then draws a target around the main cluster of bullet holes and claims to be an expert marksman. It's a logical fallacy. The claim is implausible enough to begin with, but with any real evidence, critical minds dismiss such nonsense out of hand.
Most of the evidence used to support the idea that 9/11 was an 'inside job' is unreliable, mostly edited, altered to make it seem that way, and coming from sketchy extremist sources. My uncle lived in New York at the time, and he witnessed the attack, as he worked in one of the nearby buildings. So you're telling me that what he saw was fake...? And what about what all the other people who were present saw?
Besides, the attack on the twin towers was not the only one. There was one on the pentagon and one aimed at the white house. The latter never reached its destination as the passengers in the plane revolted against the terrorists, ultimately ending in the plane landing in the outskirts of Pennsylvania. There are recorded phone calls from the people in the plane to their loved ones in their moments before dying, and the remains of the plane were found. You're telling me that those who lost their loved ones were merely part of a "fake outside attack"? That their accounts TO THEIR LOVED ONES were lies?
Those who think the United Stated were involved because they didn't blow up the planes; they were COMMERCIAL PLANES, with AMERICAN CITIZENS in them, and besides the exact same thing happened in the Pearl Harbour attack! They were taken by surprise and attacked by planes. If it happened to them one time, who says it wouldn't happen a second?
If you still aren't convinced, you should check this out. http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/debunking-911-myths-planes
Not a single argument made has any facts backing it up. A controlled demolition is impossible with all the security after 1993, and why the F would the government bomb the pentagon, if that's what you suspect happened. There is no evidence to anything you say, other than some idiot looking at low quality video footage and claiming "there is no plane"