Amazon.com Widgets
  • The prince is not so charming.

    Yeah, I am going to have to say yes, Prince Charming was a bit of a pervert. If you consider the three classic fairy tale Prince Charmings, the one from Snow White, the one from Sleeping Beauty and the one from Cinderella, two of these three kissed girls they thought to be dead (I suppose one could claim he thought she was just in a coma, but still, she was not a willing participant in said kiss) and the other had danced with a girl the entire night without noticing anything about her with the exception of her feet. All a bit not right.

  • Child-hood memories don't trump consent

    The "intense" power of love does not trump the need to obtain consent from someone else before kissing them. Prince Charming kissed a random girl who was unconscious for no justifiable reason except that he thought she was hot. Please tell me, in what real life context would that be justifiable? They should have a re-make of the movie where Snow White wakes up and says "Ew why would you just assume I'm into you?" and take him to jail. There's nothing charming about Prince Creeper.

  • The theme surrounding him may be

    Prince Charming as a character wasn't written to be a pervert, but the themes surrounding him are. For one, it disregards the entire notion of consent between romantic partners. It's assumed Snow White automatically want the prince, and the prince gets the girl without any sign that she consents to the deal.

  • No! Stop ruining fairy tales with adult lenses.

    I think that adults miss the point of these stories sometimes. Of course he wasn't a pervert, he is a sweet prince looking for love. It isn't about sexual perversion, but merely the overwhelming power of love and attraction to another. It is meant to be a pure statement, not what this is making it out to be.

  • No! Stop ruining fairy tales with adult lenses.

    I think that adults miss the point of these stories sometimes. Of course he wasn't a pervert; he is a sweet prince looking for love. It isn't about sexual perversion but merely the overwhelming power of love and attraction to another. It is meant to be a pure statement, not what this is making it out to be.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
Truth5 says2014-02-09T07:51:44.497
O stop it. Noticing lower extremities is not "abnormal" or perverted. That is simply an establishment talking point aimed at marginalizing the medicinal & spiritual nature of the humble foot. The humble foot [ & those that recognize their spiritual & medicinal significance ] is singled out for opprobrium because the mass recognizing the true place of the human foot would be a threat tot he establishment. Your foot chakras connect divine energy from the Earth to your soul - without which you would fail to function in the manner you do. Peoples' soles are saturated with their own the soul energy that is picked up by just about any passing person. It is more bizarre to suggest that no one would ever notice a region of the human body that it just teeming with such strong spiritual energies drawing people's attention to the region - particularly if you already feel drawn to the person in question.

Notice that the word soul & sole sound the same reflecting this reality. The healing art of reflexology would heal people of numerous maladies without the use of drugs. This is the main reason why the establishment disparages the humble foot which really should be called the root. Buildings & mountains have a foot but living things have a root. What we are forced to call a human foot is really the human root as it is connected to the Ley Lines / Earth energy grid via the sole chakras. If you ever take the time to look at your foot / root you would notice that its shape corresponds EXACTLY to that of the human body: the big toe represents the head... The ball represents the shoulders... The sloping curving instep represents the back & the robust heel represents the rump & legs. You are all so IGNORANT of the true meaning of the humble foot / root.

This ignorance is perpetuated by the establishment because the pharmaceutical industry would loose too much money if the people realized that they could treat themselves via the manipulation of the pressure points on their own soles & palms as well as taping into the natural flowing soul energy chakras at the soles. There is no such thing as a "foot fetish" as this was a myth cooked up by the establishment in order to promote the skewed & unhealthy dialectic that the natural interest in lower extremities was "abnormal" or perverted when in reality it is quite normal & even essential in order to promote well being. The proper term for erotic interest in the foot was "foot partialist" but that too is an incorrect descriptor for the simple reason that those folks notice the rest of the body as well. You see... They are trying to convince the public that the natural noticing of the humble foot / root is "sick" when in fact the opposite is true. For instance... It is well known that foot rubs raise the vibration of the folks who receive them. Which is a big no-no under the current system that seeks to keep people in a lower state of vibration thus in an unhappier & unhealthy state. Foot rubs are so relaxing & healthy - they increase circulation / vitality / a sense of well being along with raising vibration - that they can even help make you mentally sharper. I urge you all to do a massive rethink of this demonized topic & do some research for yourself to discover how much you have been lied to over this topic.