Waterboarding is valuable to the war on terror and should be used in some extreme cases. I, like the typical citizen do not like the thought of our government being able to legally waterboard people but what you have to understand is, these are bad people. These are people who have claimed their allegiance to terrorist groups and we know have information that would help us help crack terror wide open or to help prevent an imminent attack. And on top of that, waterboarding would be used when these people are being interrogated and are not being cooperative so these are people I, and many people would not have a ton of sympathy for. Waterboarding is wrong and should not be used in a widespread way but when it comes to helping us in the war on terror and keeping us safe, it definitely is valuable and should be legal in some cases.
Would you rather not waterboard a terrorist and let an attack that could kill any number of people slip through our fingers? The fact of the matter is that each time we waterboard a terrorist we get valuable intel from that terrorist that could prevent an attack and save any number of innocent civilian lives.
Yes. I believe that the waterboarding technique has value in the war on terror. Some terrorist really believe their cause is the only way. It sometimes takes physical persuasion to attain information that is need to save lives. It should only be used as a last resort, but that does not make it any less valuable.
Waterboarding was used quite often as a form of torture, to extract information from detainees held by the American government during the Iraq war. Water boarding includes dumping vast sums of water onto a person and is a tactic that proved useful during the war, but overall is not considered morally okay. While we may have gotten some facts, they were more than likely not worth the bad image it has caused.
Yes, waterboarding is valuable to the war on terror because it can make Al Qaida give up their secrets. If Al Qaida gives up their secrets, we will win the war on terror. It might be costly to have to torture them to give up the secrets, but I think it is worth it.
Waterboarding is not valuable to the war on terror. Waterboarding is a form of torture, more specifically a type of water torture, in which water is poured over a cloth covering the face and breathing passages of an immobilized captive, causing the individual to experience the sensation of drowning. Waterboarding can cause extreme pain, dry drowning, damage to lungs, brain damage from oxygen deprivation, other physical injuries including broken bones due to struggling against restraints, lasting psychological damage, and death. This should not be done to anyone.
If anything, waterboarding as a form of torture makes prisoners of war give false information more readily so the torture stops faster. Good interrogations don't need waterboarding or any form of torture to be effective. Sleep deprivation is a far better method of getting information because humans have lapses in judgment when they are tired. The war on terror should be won with electronic surveillance for intel, not torture.
Without a doubt, waterboarding is a terrible thing that shouldn't be used against anyone. This "enhanced interrogation technique" is nothing short of torture and has lasting negative consequences on its victims. Therefore, waterboarding should be banned by all countries in the world because its use is nothing short of a travesty.
No, waterboarding is not valuable to the war on terror as it is a torture technique, and torture has never been proved to produce reliable results. Most people who experience torture will say anything in order to get the torture to stop, and often times the things they say are lies.