Janet Reno dropped the ball because the accused officers were acquitted in the death of Arthur McDuffie. McDuffie was an African-American while the four officers were white. Reno shouldn't have tried to play the race card and instead focus on the evidence. Reno should have said the police were overly violent due to McDuffie's bashed skull as opposed to the fact that the officers were white and the victim was black.
Janet Reno was not the racist during the trial of four white police officers who assaulted a black insurance salesman, resulting in his death. She was the prosecutor. She presented her case, even bringing in an eye witness who had been granted immunity to testify, and his testimony was graphic. It was the jury's decision, and if anyone was racist it was them.
Janet Reno's actions during the 1980 Miami riots trial were not racist. Janet Reno was the prosecutor in the case, which involved 4 white officers who were charged with manslaughter after their pursuit of an African American motorcyclist resulted in the cyclist's death. Certain officers where given immunity in exchange for testimony. The jury was made up of all white males. Janet Reno's actions were not racist because she was arguing on behalf of the African American victim.
No, Janet Reno's actions during the 1980 Miami riots trial were not racist. Her job was to ensure that a guilty verdict was reached, and she did so by influencing the jury by every ethical and procedural means available to her. Prosecutors aren't designed to be nice or likable people.
No, Janet Reno's actions during the 1980 Miami riots trial was not racist, because she was just reacting to a situation that was already there. Janet Reno has done some questionable things in her career (Elian Gonzalez), but she was only prosecuting the case she had based on the evidence she was able to present.