Amazon.com Widgets

Who would win in a fight, a Vampire, or a Basilisk?

Asked by: Amzer
  • Vampires are Immortal

    If we are going by stereotypical Vampires then the reasons why Vampires would win are as follows:
    1. They are Immortal
    By being immortal the Basilisk can not kill them Via staring or biting.

    2. Vampires can turn into bats which are fast and use echo-location
    If the vampire turns into a bat then the Vampire will have the ranged advantage and can simply swoop in whenever it needs to.

    This applies to the Mythological Basilisk (Not the Harry Potter one)
    3.The Basilisk is short and probably couldn't do anything to the Vampire and they can then probably squish it.

    This applies to the Harry Potter Basilisk
    4. By blinding the Basilisk it will then be completely blind and can have trouble finding the Vampire (Bat form) and will therefore not be able to see its next attack especially if in a loud area.

  • Vampire's wouldn't win because

    Basilisks are way bigger. Even though vampires are fast and are immortal, it doesn't make them immune to injury. Vampires can get injured and get drained of blood which make them die because they survive on blood. So if a basilisk bites them and drains there blood, they will die.

  • Vampires are allergic to snake blood

    In the book series cirque du freak it says vampires are allergic. I run out of things to say so the rest of this is nothing.

    Hvhhig ffuhur fhr fbff fffr ff nff fg f f f f ff g fgf g gg gg g g gg g g gg

  • Basilisks are cooler

    Read a book dammit. Twilight sucks ass. S
    s
    s
    s
    s

    s
    s
    s
    s
    s
    s

    s
    s
    s
    s
    s
    s

    s
    s
    s
    s
    s
    s

    s
    s
    s
    s
    s
    s

    s
    s
    s
    s
    s

    s
    s
    s
    s
    s

    s
    s
    s
    s
    s


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.