Amazon.com Widgets

Who would win: Sword with a Gun or Gun with a sword?

Asked by: Atlantic
  • There are the same weapons!

    Both options have the same weapons, however, as long as I'm arguing for sword with a gun, I have a few points. You need a warrant to carry a gun, and gunshots can be traced back to your gun specifically. When you by a gun, it goes on record that you indeed have one. You can buy a sword much more easily, and if you stab someone, you can dispose of the weapon and no one will be the wiser. Swords are also silent, and they look cooler. Most of the people arguing for guns have obviously never fired one, and probably have zero experience with them outside of unrealistic video games.

  • They are the same thing!

    Both options have the same weapons, however, as long as I'm arguing for sword with a gun, I have a few points. You need a warrant to carry a gun, and gunshots can be traced back to your gun specifically. When you by a gun, it goes on record that you indeed have one. You can buy a sword much more easily, and if you stab someone, you can dispose of the weapon and no one will be the wiser. Swords are also silent, and they look cooler. Most of the people arguing for guns have obviously never fired one, and probably have zero experience with them outside of unrealistic video games.

  • Yes would win.

    Both options have a sword in them . A sword has a blade . A blade has both two sides and has a bottom. 2 + 1 = 3 . A triangle has three sides. #ILLUMINATICONFIRMED ( s p a c e f i l l e r ) .

  • Who Would Win? Gun With a Sword = No, Sword with a Gun = Yes

    I think a Sword with a Gun would. The gun is larger than the sword with Gun w/ a sword, and guns need quick movement in order to fire accurately. With Sword w/ a Gun, a sword needs less mobility than a gun allowing quick movement for both weapons. But what do you think?

  • Gun with a sword would win

    The gun is the main weapon in this one but the is sword is a secondary weapon but on the sword with a gun the sword is a primary weapon and the gun is a secondary. But the gun has more range than the sword and can be used for long range battle the sword on the gun with a sword is going to be used more for sneaking up on people and getting melee kills

  • Gun with a sword.

    Back in the revolutionary war they had rifles and a sword together, but mostly the gun was used. A gun will always be used first because it can hit farther away and it you can't really deflect it. Therefore Gun with a Sword! (I also only did this because no one else had said no).

  • A range weapon is (usually) better

    If you use a gun as a primary weapon and the sword as secondary, it honestly depends on the location of the battle.If it is in a small lane where its hard to gain agility, the gun would be slightly harder to use. But if the battle is on an open field, you could move back wards while shooting, slowing the opponent down if he can deflect them which is really rare or immobilising him if you shoot at any point of the body.

  • The Gun with a sword would win, without a doubt

    The gun with a sword would be a long range and short rang fighter. They sword with a gun would only be able to either use the gun or the sword at different times because the sword would have to move it's whole body to swing at someone. The Gun with a sword could use both at the same time.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.