Amazon.com Widgets
  • Yes it will

    Most of the stuff you learn is useless but if it's required you can it in days with Google instead of weeks. I have needed to take 3 weeks to learn the plant cell but I can learn the entire thing about in 5-10 MINTUTES which is better because you can learn complex thing a lot faster and understand it more because most teachers don't explain it well enough for some kids to understand since most teachers only care about the money

  • Our Caring Teachers:

    Teachers are the ones who explain us everything in detail,which a computer cannot.Though the computer serves as a reference in our day-to-day life it does not directly state the topic properly.Whereas on the other hand there are teachers who try to make us understand for our bright future. Yes, i do believe that learning is a process which has no ending,but i would like to say that a teacher shouldn't be replaced with technology.
    Thank You ,
    for reading

  • Our Caring Teachers:

    Teachers are the ones who explain us everything in detail,which a computer cannot.Though the computer serves as a reference in our day-to-day life it does not directly state the topic properly.Whereas on the other hand there are teachers who try to make us understand for our bright future. Yes, i do believe that learning is a process which has no ending,but i would like to say that a teacher shouldn't be replaced with technology.
    Thank You ,
    for reading

  • I really don't know...

    There are many great reasons for both sides so I really don't know. Both sides gave great reasons but since "NO" towers yes, I'll go with yes. I g g g c be g. H. H be the first half of the day man oin I on be in a

  • Yes, I suppose.......

    Technology in its way is the one which cannot be challenged. The amount of knowledge is universal and its been proven that the brain percepts visualistic explanations more than just what the teachers teach. The most important factor is of time. We can access the internet wherever and whenever we want. Its not the same with teachers. There are some limitations to the knowledge that the teachers impart us. This is a competitive era, and most of the teachers inspite of knowing this don't help the students with it. You may say that many children don't have the facility of making use of technology, but our government knows this and it has started many schemes related to this. Although this will take some time to get implemented, the prime minister kind of seems in favor of this. Technology has gained momentum in education and the ones who don't make use of it will be at loss!

  • Yes it is true

    S I m q w e r t y u I o p a s d f g h j k l z x c v b n m q w e r t y u o ip a a d f g h j k like x c v b n m

  • Teachers are obsolete

    Teachers from the elementary level through high school and beyond do an inadequate job of teaching. Many teachers are unqualified to teach, and often times teach straight from a book. I beleive that a well written program could teach a student much more effectively than a teacher, because teachers are prone to human error, teacher procrastination, and inefficient grading of assignments. With computers and technology students could rewind a video or get instant feedback so they can quickly correct their mistakes. A common argument against this is that school teaches students important social skills. Why not have a "school/club" whose sole purpose is to teach students these social skills, and leave the actual education to the computers and technology that can do it best.

    Posted by: B2C
  • Teachers are obsolete

    Teachers from the elementary level through high school and beyond do an inadequate job of teaching. Many teachers are unqualified to teach, and often times teach straight from a book. I beleive that a well written program could teach a student much more effectively than a teacher, because teachers are prone to human error, teacher procrastination, and inefficient grading of assignments. With computers and technology students could rewind a video or get instant feedback so they can quickly correct their mistakes. A common argument against this is that school teaches students important social skills. Why not have a "school/club" whose sole purpose is to teach students these social skills, and leave the actual education to the computers and technology that can do it best.

  • Teachers are obsolete

    Teachers are inefficient. Many children in elementary all the way up to high school recieve inadequate education hindered by unqualified teachers who teach straight from the book. I would argue that a well structured program would insure the kids would understand the information being taught. With a computer the student could rewind a video to listen to the part of a lesson he didn't quite grasp, or more easily find and complete assignments because they are all in one place on the computer. Although it could be argued that school is for social skills, why don't we have a seperate "school/club" thats sole purpose is to teach social skills, and leave education to computers and technology that can handle it best.

  • Teachers who use technology will replace those who do not use technology.

    But technology, by itself, cannot fully engage or properly teach a classroom. It is the variety of different teachers and learning styles that keep students interested. They may complain about their crazy English teacher and their boring science teacher, but it really does keep school exciting. That's only the tip of the iceberg, too. Teachers are role models- especially in a world where at least 50% of marriages end in divorce. Teachers WITH technology are better than teachers without technology since it helps them stay organized and connected with their students.

  • Teachers help in choosing career

    The teacher can give us adive what we do in future by see our interest even robot not its only do by that it programs but teacher do thhey give advice and also tell us how we have to study by seeing our capability they chear up to do more

  • Not now and not ever....

    I being a 15 year old can figure that......It s true that technology gives us more knowledge than our school teacher and they need to update themselves a bit now and then....But honestly does anyone remember being in school the fun and all other stuff....Our teachers who used to scold us ,report us to parents,mentors us,etc....Where is the fun without them...Our parents too are teachers ..Just imagine a child is born and the first face he looks at is a robot....Do you think a child will love going to school like most of us did if the teacher was a robot....OPEN YOUR MIND THINK WIDE AND FAR....

  • Not now and not ever....

    I being a 15 year old can figure that......It s true that technology gives us more knowledge than our school teacher and they need to update themselves a bit now and then....But honestly does anyone remember being in school the fun and all other stuff....Our teachers who used to scold us ,report us to parents,mentors us,etc....Where is the fun without them...Our parents too are teachers ..Just imagine a child is born and the first face he looks at is a robot....Do you think a child will love going to school like most of us did if the teacher was a robot....OPEN YOUR MIND THINK WIDE AND FAR....

  • Not now and not ever....

    I being a 15 year old can figure that......It s true that technology gives us more knowledge than our school teacher and they need to update themselves a bit now and then....But honestly does anyone remember being in school the fun and all other stuff....Our teachers who used to scold us ,report us to parents,mentors us,etc....Where is the fun without them...Our parents too are teachers ..Just imagine a child is born and the first face he looks at is a robot....Do you think a child will love going to school like most of us did if the teacher was a robot....OPEN YOUR MIND THINK WIDE AND FAR....

  • NO! Technology cant replace teachers

    Since technology cant hug us congratulate us or either understand our feelings can only tell us the information's,a teacher explains a topic so well that nobody else can.Neither does a computer laughs or make jokes.I hope u understand and agree with me.Jwduhuh juhujnhu ujuhu uju ujuj ujujuh huj j j

  • Teachers are Very good

    Technology cannot replace teachers the info on Internet comes from where from a teacher, anyone who gives you academic info in detail is a teacher. Without teachers the academic sector of technology would be a trashcan. Teacher doesn't mean only the teacher in the school even our parents are teachers. The one who fills information on Internet is a teacher to the technology

  • We would be doomed

    Technology offers one thing, and that is CANNED RESPONSES. If we teach with canned responses, we lose ALL critical thinking and real problem solving skills. Computers would teach our youth to get stuck when they run into a problem they were not "programmed" for. We would also lose our humanity when human interaction is lost and compassion is not felt. When a Teacher sees a Student struggling on a given task, they can assist with human reasoning and real-world problem solving skills. I saw a dumb comedy movie once, and it scared me A LOT... It was called Idiocracy. If you want to see what a world would be like if we relied too much on technology, you should watch that movie. It is almost a documentary!

  • Our Caring Teachers:

    Teachers are the ones who explain us everything in detail,which a computer cannot.Though the computer serves as a reference in our day-to-day life it does not directly state the topic properly.Whereas on the other hand there are teachers who try to make us understand for our bright future. Yes, i do believe that learning is a process which has no ending,but i would like to say that a teacher shouldn't be replaced with technology.
    Thank You ,
    for reading

  • One who is marvellous

    Teachers are the second mothers of a student..We can never differentiate between a teacher and technology.A teacher tries to give all the information regarding studies and activities.But the technology cannot.The technology cannot explain a student thoroughly whereas a teacher can do so.Teachers have five properties.Mother,friend,one who fulfills your courier,one who teaches you what is right and what is wrong and one who can read a child's mind.

  • Emotions are very important

    Machine can only teach us what is feeded in it. It will not tell us the basic things... Like discipline..Etc. Our teachers tell us everything like.. How to sit.. How to react..How to behave. They understand our problems by just seeing us. They can share their experience with us. They can give us opinions. Machine cant do this.. It will only display its syllabus..


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.