Amazon.com Widgets

Will the Benghazi attacks tarnish Hillary Clinton's legacy as Secretary of State?

  • Not Secretary of State, but as a future candidate for president

    We cannot only blame Clinton for this, but also Obama, and his whole administration. Instead of being a hero and helping to stand up for the Americans, they stood down. Good luck trying to run for president, Hillary. You are a good person, but between you and Obama and his admin. you made 4 innocent Americans die just to blame it on an anti-Islam video. Shame on all of you.

  • No, It Should Not

    The Benghazi attacks should not and probably will not tarnish Clinton's reputation and legacy as U.S. Secretary of State. The Republican held House actually voted to cut security spending for the embassies, and they attempted to lay the blame on Clinton instead of owning up to their own responsibilities. The right wing media tried to make this a bigger deal than it was, but at the end of the day, the fault doesn't lie with Clinton.

  • No, It Should Not

    The Benghazi attacks should not and probably will not tarnish Clinton's reputation and legacy as U.S. Secretary of State. The Republican held House actually voted to cut security spending for the embassies, and they attempted to lay the blame on Clinton instead of owning up to their own responsibilities. The right wing media tried to make this a bigger deal than it was, but at the end of the day, the fault doesn't lie with Clinton.

  • Not at all.

    The Benghazi attacks were not about any one person or any one person's neglect. Hillary has always had her detractors, but even they can pin this on her. She has proven herself to be a most competent, caring, careful Secretary of State, and has most recently defended her record with dignity and integrity.


Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
No comments yet.