I would stop going to Starbucks irrelevant of whether or not Neal Young goes or not. As they are a criminal company who have evaded millions upon millions of $/£ worth of tax, pitilessly forced the closure of smaller independantly owned coffee shops as well as them being a supporter and financier of the terrorist rogue state of Israel.
Those companies are piles of garbage really. I mean really now -- what kinda garbage do these companies make -- McCafe, Dunkin Donuts, Chipotle, Starbucks, etc. If I want real coffee, I'll make some quickie coffee at home. I mean really now, folks. What's to boycott. This is a bum company -- nothing more. Worthless.
No, I would not stop going to Starbucks because Neil Young boycotted them. What celebrities do or do not do never affects what I choose to do. If I want to go to Starbucks then what Neil Young has done will not have any effect whatsoever on my decision to patronize them.
No, I would not stop going to Starbucks because Neil Young is boycotting them. If I felt that there was a reason to no longer go to Starbucks, it would be because I had a personal reason and not because someone like Neil Young or anybody else has a personal reason to.
I would not stop going to Starbucks just because Neil Young is boycotting them unless he has a real good excuse. If they are doing dirty business practices, raising rates too high, or are discriminating in any way, then I would boycott. But, if he's doing this just to become relevant again, then I will not follow the crowd.
I am sick of celebrity causes. They always have to but in and share their often flawed opinions. Neil Young is a minor celebrity at that and should probably keep his opinion to himself. I don't go to Starbucks very often and his boycott will have no effect on my future patronage.