|Online:||1 Year Ago||Name:||Patrick Private|
|Updated:||4 Years Ago||Gender:||Male|
|Joined:||4 Years Ago||Birthday:||August 14, 1993|
|President:||Not Saying||Email:||- Private -|
|Activities:||Debate, Chilling :) LYING IN THE GRASS!|
|Beliefs:||Difficult to summarize|
|Books:||James Bond, Graham Greene novels|
|Movies:||Anything by Scorcese, The Boondock Saints, James Bond|
|Music:||Red Hot Chili Peppers, The Killers, Phoenix, and admittedly, a lot of lame-ass pop|
|Sports Teams:||BEAVERS!!! Bengals, Pats, NOT the Yankees|
|TV Shows:||Anything on usa, The Office, 30 Rock, Bones, House|
Corvallis High School, Class of 2012
Corvallis, Oregon, United States
Resolved: Theism is epistemicly superior to Atheism. Request: If you would be so kind as to post only your case, we can use the second round for direct refutation and proceed to full debate in the final 2 rounds. If you'd rather debate another way, that's fine too. Rule: Evidence found via research must be sourced, so that the context of that evidence may be examined. If a piece of evidence is not sourced by the voting period, it shall be assumed that the evidence was false Note: I will...
Hello, welcome to the debate.The debate is simply as the resolution stands. No squirreling of terminology to change the intended purpose of debate, the division of labour is mostly on myself (though my opponent should present a counterplan).The round structures should be as followed:R1 - Acceptance and any opening remarks.R2 - An explanation of your ethical system. There should not be serious engagement with the opposition's argument, though it can touch upon it.R3 - A riposte to the...
About a month ago, I did a debate on this topic with someone else. The debate did not go as well as I had hoped, and pcmbrown said that he would be willing to accept it if I re-issued it. Now I have. Before I begin, some definitions: Good: conforming to set standards; suitable, sufficient or satisfactory Children's movie: a movie created specifically for viewing by audiences ages 2-14 A children's movie is usually characterized by its witty humor, appropriate content, and a light-he...
Resolved: Grand Canyon National Park should be auctioned off to the highest bidder. My opponent has requested that, in the spirit of traditional forensics, he ought to argue first and last. Further, neither of us may present new arguments in the 5th round, it being a crystallization round. If the debate is still rather heated at that point, we may mutually decide to extend new arguments into the 5th round. My opponent has also accepted the burden of proof. I give the floor, and the definit...
Contradiction: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradiction Rules: 1. In Rounds 1-3, CON will ask PRO ten Yes/No questions. 2. In Rounds 2-4, PRO will answer all of CON's questions with Yes, No, or an explanation as to why neither answer would be completely correct. 3. In Rounds 2-4, CON can point out any contradictions that he or she believes to be present in PRO's answers. 4. When CON points out a contradiction, PRO may use all of the following rounds to defend the accused contradiction u...
|Statistics based on completed debates.|
This list identifies where pcmbrown stands on popular issues. The choices are limited to the following:
- N/O - No Opinion
- N/S - Not Saying
- Und - Undecided
- Con - Against
- Pro - In Favor
You can also click each issue to find other members that agree with pcmbrown's position on the issue.
|•||Global Warming Exists||Pro|
|•||Medicaid & Medicare||Und|
|•||National Health Care||Und|
|•||National Retail Sales Tax||Und|
|•||War in Afghanistan||Pro|
|•||War on Terror||Pro|