<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Debate.org: Atheism's Debates</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/?order=1&amp;sort=&amp;member=Atheism</link>
<description>Customize this RSS feed by going to http://www.debate.org/rss/</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>2013-05-22T21:04:57-08:00</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2013-05-22T21:04:57-08:00</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>This following statement is, at some point in time, false: The Earth sky is yellow.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/This-following-statement-is-at-some-point-in-time-false-The-Earth-sky-is-yellow./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Resolution affirmed. Prove that the Earth sky is always yellow, and you win.
Sky
 1. The expanse of air over any given point on the earth; the upper atmosphere as seen from the earth's surface.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/sky

Yellow
1. The hue of that portion of the visible spectrum lying between orange and green, evoked in the human observer by radiant energy with wavelengths of approximately 570 to 590 nanometers; any of a group of colors of a hue resembling that of ripe lemons and varying in lightness and saturation; one of the subtractive primaries; one of the psychological primary hues.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/yellow

Arguments
1.When I go outside,the sky looks like many colors to me, even yellow at some point, but it always changes colors. As of now, it looks blue to me. I am not, nor have I ever been, colorblind, so this must be true.

2. The argument that this is merely an illusion is one that is baseless. There is no proof th</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/This-following-statement-is-at-some-point-in-time-false-The-Earth-sky-is-yellow./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-06-05T22:09:05-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Is the world without nuclear weapons possible ?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Is-the-world-without-nuclear-weapons-possible/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) It is fresh in our memory that U.S. president Barack Obama made a speech in Prague in April 2009 to try to make a world without nuclear weapons. In this speech he made clear ``the U.S. must seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons.``(1) He also said that ``as a nuclear power, as the only nuclear power to have used a nuclear weapon, the United States has a moral responsibility to act``(2)toward building a world without nuclear weapons.
After the end of World War Second the world has promoted to eliminate the production and possessing of nuclear weapons among the member states of the United Nations. In particular, Nuclear Non proliferation Treaty has played an important role in creating a world without nuclear weapons. Moreover, after the end of Cold War many people in the world have participated in the movement to build a world without nuclear weapons on a global scale. However, unfortunately their objectives and appeals are not realized t</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Is-the-world-without-nuclear-weapons-possible/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-09-22T09:26:11-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Impromptu 9</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Impromptu-9/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) INSTRUCTIONS:
Round 1, opponent will select 1 of the 3 topic choices listed below to present in Round 2. Opponent will also leave me 3 topic choices to pick from for my Round 2 presentation. Judges will decide who made the better presentation.

My OPPONENT's topic choices:

1) The average home school kid will score higher than the average public school kid.
2) DUI equals attempted murder.
3) The Rapture will occur before 15 May 2048.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Impromptu-9/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-06-07T20:54:04-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The cake is a lie.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-cake-is-a-lie./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I assert that the cake at the end of the game Portal is a lie.
Cake definition:A sweet baked food made of flour, liquid, eggs, and other ingredients, such as raising agents and flavorings.
I thank my opponent in advance for providing me with my first debate.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-cake-is-a-lie./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-06-05T12:56:41-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sources for Disease Outbreak Debate</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Sources-for-Disease-Outbreak-Debate/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Round 1:&lt;br /&gt;[1] &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/ajcs9&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/ajcs9&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;[2] &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/33s35a&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/33s35a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;[3] &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/62pqfxg&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/62pqfxg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;[4] &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/6ng4er&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/6ng4er&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;[5] &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/5r5acfg&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/5r5acfg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;[6] &lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/33s35a&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/33s35a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;[7]&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/yyt9by&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/yyt9by&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;[8]&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/zbf57&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/zbf57&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;[9] &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/cwat5&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/cwat5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/stron</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Sources-for-Disease-Outbreak-Debate/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-04-30T22:50:26-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>I'm sexier than you are.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Im-sexier-than-you-are./1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) I'm sexy. I know it, and soon all people will know this as well.&lt;br /&gt;
Just introduce yourself.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Im-sexier-than-you-are./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-01-23T04:11:32-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Is it right for God to punish anyone for their thoughts/beliefs/values etc ?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Is-it-right-for-God-to-punish-anyone-for-their-thoughts-beliefs-values-etc/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Notes: If you have a problem with definitions,rules, etc please post in comments section first

Rule 1: No posting of links like you tube

I wish to have a debate on the common objection of how its wrong for God to punish people for &quot;thought crimes&quot; eg thoughts, beliefs, values, conceptualizations etc

Definition of God - Its existence is uncaused, morally good, all powerful, all knowing, personal, the prime/first mover

As the Pro, I will be arguing that it is right for God to punish for thought crimes

As the Con, My opponent will be arguing that is is wrong for God to punish for thought crimes

Note* It is assumed for this debate that God exists

My opening argument

People would not object for instance if God punished someone for murder, or baby rape or listening to Justin Bieber music, but yet at the same time object that God could or would punish for anyone of their thoughts, beliefs, values, conceptualizations etc.

My argument is as fo</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Is-it-right-for-God-to-punish-anyone-for-their-thoughts-beliefs-values-etc/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-12-04T11:22:02-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>is focusing on making cars more &quot;green&quot; hurting progress in creating improvements for them?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/is-focusing-on-making-cars-more-green-hurting-progress-in-creating-improvements-for-them/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) My argument here is that scientists and designers have worked backwards in attempting to create cars that are safe for the environment when we could potentially have cars that are flying or are near to it if we hadn't been focusing on making everything &quot;green&quot;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/is-focusing-on-making-cars-more-green-hurting-progress-in-creating-improvements-for-them/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-12-01T15:34:35-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Medical Marijuana</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Medical-Marijuana/3/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) ========
Introduction
========
 
I will be arguing that Medical Marijuana should be illegal while my opponent will argue that medical marijuana should be and/or remain legal. For the purposes of this debate, medical marijuana will stand as Marijuana used to help manage, suppress, or reverse symptoms from medical disorders, such as but not necessarily limited to AIDS, cancer, chronic pain, glaucoma, etc.

If my opponent feels that there is something I haven't made clear then tell me during the first round of this debate and I will be more than happy to clarify as best as I can. I want to thank my opponent in advance for accepting this debate.

I will let my opponent start his argument first.

======
Definition
======

Marijuana: The female leaves of the Cannabis plant as used to create a number of euphoriant and hallucinogenic drugs.

Medical: Relating to the study or practice of medicine.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Medical-Marijuana/3/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-11-24T01:33:11-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Marijuana should not be legalized</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Marijuana-should-not-be-legalized/8/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) The legalization of any drug may cause major problems in our society. When a doctor proscribes a drug it is for medical uses, but is sometimes used to get high. The patients that want to use marijuana to get high may crack the system and not need to go see a doctor. The drugs may find there way into our schools and cause a more major drug problems in our schools. If we do not want an increase of drug issues in our society Marijuana should not be legalized.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Marijuana-should-not-be-legalized/8/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-09-07T18:03:11-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>in a fight between pain(nagato) vs madara, pain would win</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/in-a-fight-between-pain-nagato-vs-madara-pain-would-win/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) While speaking derogatorily to Pain, he still recognized his power as the strongest in Akatsuki and for possessing the Rinnegan.--- taken from narutopedia</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/in-a-fight-between-pain-nagato-vs-madara-pain-would-win/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-08-19T14:09:13-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Great Britain- The Anti-Christ's last stand</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Great-Britain-The-Anti-Christs-last-stand/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Great Britain has always influenced the world with its culture, military and economic status. Ever seen a man wear a shirt, tie and a custom made pants- It's British. When you wear a formal suit- it is British. When you talk in English- the language is from England. There is no Empire in the world that has influenced the world as has the Great Britain. Heck! The bible you read is KJV or NKJV- well it is from England. Even during the era of Rome this nation stood toe to toe with the most powerful empire despite its small size. Then it was in the dark ages that this nation slowly started to rise from the ashes like a phoenix. This nation has always run parallel with super powers like US and Europe. If you compare the pound then it is surprising to see that sometimes Euro struggles to keep up with the versatile pound. 

I think I have given enough evidence that Great Britain is strong enough to lead the world if US or China got omitted from the phase of this wor</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Great-Britain-The-Anti-Christs-last-stand/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-06-11T21:20:55-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Existence of God.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Existence-of-God./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) You said in your thread that there is a god, and you can assure me that. Well, I want you to assure me. Please, try to refrain from scripture, as you would need to prove it for it to have any relevance.
By assure, I mean for you to present a very convincing argument, or at least a well thought out one. I want you to present such an argument that it will win you the majority of votes, or at least impress me.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Existence-of-God./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-06-10T02:31:36-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rusiian Military is superpower</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Rusiian-Military-is-superpower/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) My opinion is that Russian military strenght is very overrated.My argument is that a country that barely is able to pay salaries for their service members can not be considered a military superpower.
 
Russian annual military budget from all the world military spending has been only 3.9% compared to 46.5% of USA.

 If country wants to be a military superpower it has to have military sealift and airlift capabilities (real, not on the paper) - russian military doesn`t have any of these if they wanted to quickly transport enough military cargo and troops to war zone to sustain winning warfighting. USA has been involved in many wars in global arena and it has proved it`s logistical capabilities countless times.
 
Russian military is aging - it`s a Cold War relict rather than 21st century warfare capable fighting force. Despite annual arms trade shows were Russia keeps introducing new ``high tec`` weapons platforms actually 95% of those are for export and mili</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Rusiian-Military-is-superpower/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-07-16T12:43:56-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Chuck Norris Is The Ultimate Character In Mugen</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Chuck-Norris-Is-The-Ultimate-Character-In-Mugen/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) My argument is that Chuck Norris is the ultimate Mugen game character. Mugen is an open source computer fighting game for all those who don't know.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MauTTZXQTTA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPJmJrCYQI4&amp;feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyO6EYBcz44&amp;feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L10keHg7wNE&amp;feature=related
http://www.mugenation.com/
http://mugen.en.softonic.com/</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Chuck-Norris-Is-The-Ultimate-Character-In-Mugen/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-09-19T11:55:36-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A chainsaw is the worst weapon in a zombie apocalypse</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/A-chainsaw-is-the-worst-weapon-in-a-zombie-apocalypse/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) The chainsaw has been used widely in zombie movies, video games, etc. However, as proved in The Zombie Survival Guide, the chainsaw is one of the worst weapons to use. 
1. It is heavyweight.
It is exaggerated how a normal person can possibly lift this weapon above their head and use it with ease to slice through a zombie. The people that normally use it are extremely muscular and the people that don't have difficulties welding it. 
2. It is cumbersome.
Why carry around a chainsaw when you can carry that ax and (loaded)pistol you saw a while back? The truth about its weight is that it is difficult to carry to and fro. It will either have to be carried by a strong member or in a vehicle that can support its weight.
3. It uses fuel.
The truth is, that fuel you just poured into your chainsaw perhaps had caused you your life. You will also have to carry that fuel tank will you along with the chainsaw while you are running from a hoard of zombies.
4. Only one </description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/A-chainsaw-is-the-worst-weapon-in-a-zombie-apocalypse/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-12-06T14:58:42-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Impromptu 12</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Impromptu-12/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) In round 1 simply list my 3 choices to present in Round 2.

You will present either side of any of the 3 choices provided in Round 2, no rebuttal.

1) There should be instant replay in baseball.
2) If people do not pay into Social Security, they cannot draw benefits.
3) Elderly people must pass a strict performance exam to renew their driver license.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Impromptu-12/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-07-21T05:15:56-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Existence Of God</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Existence-Of-God/9/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) I argue that God in fact does exist.

Being that I am instigating this debate I would like to give the first round to my opponent. I will in turn take the last round in the debate. 

Please be courteous in this debate. Excess emotion has no place in a debate.
Thank You</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Existence-Of-God/9/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-06-18T15:17:04-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Problem of evil is a good argument against God and Theodicy.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Problem-of-evil-is-a-good-argument-against-God-and-Theodicy./1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) Any times has Atheism stated that the Problem of evil is a good argument against God and Theodicy. Even in a prolonged forum debate on the subject he called ignorance and changed the subject. 

This is Atheism's moment to shine. Arguments come in Round 2. Ready up.

Atheism has this round to explain his &#8216;Problem of Evil', note - your definition has to be similar to the conventional argument.

Thank you and Good luck.


Good = Rational and Logical</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Problem-of-evil-is-a-good-argument-against-God-and-Theodicy./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2010-07-19T14:56:50-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Contradiction Debate</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Contradiction-Debate/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;During this debate the Pro has to try to not contradict himself while I ask questions, he must give a reason why he thinks this way.&lt;br /&gt;1st Round: acceptance.&lt;br /&gt;2-4- questions and answers.&lt;br /&gt;5- violations&lt;br /&gt;No cussing.&lt;br /&gt;No bold letters.&lt;br /&gt;If any of these rules are violated all 7 points go to the other person.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Contradiction-Debate/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-03-15T11:46:27-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
