<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Debate.org: Calvincambridge's Debates</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/?order=1&amp;sort=&amp;member=Calvincambridge</link>
<description>Customize this RSS feed by going to http://www.debate.org/rss/</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>2013-05-21T04:47:38-08:00</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2013-05-21T04:47:38-08:00</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Joseph Meglele is not really 100 years old</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Joseph-Meglele-is-not-really-100-years-old/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;The computer user on DDO round 1 acceptance only no semantics no trolling no ad hom no insulting. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tanks.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Joseph-Meglele-is-not-really-100-years-old/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-09-25T17:00:47-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Devout Christian absent fathers should not pay child maintenance</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Devout-Christian-absent-fathers-should-not-pay-child-maintenance/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Jesus' father, God, impregnated Jesus' mother, Mrs Mary Christ, and then did a runner leaving her and her husband, Mr Joseph Christ, to bring up the parental duty-dodging deity's son on a lowly carpenter's wage.

You may think God was a cad and a bounder for putting a married woman up the duff and then legging it back to Heaven, and that such behaviour would be more befitting a chav on the Jeremy Kyle Show rather than that of a respectable god, but never mind that, pious Christians are supposed to have blind faith in their religion, and not to ask any awkward questions, so devout absent fathers should follow God's example and not pay any money to help bring their kids up.

This may mean they go to prison here on earth but that is better than going to hell in the afterlife for defying God's will.

Thank you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gfsh5NeCeLU</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Devout-Christian-absent-fathers-should-not-pay-child-maintenance/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-07-26T19:24:12-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Race Traitor&quot; is a Fallacy</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Race-Traitor-is-a-Fallacy/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Resolved: The term &quot;Race Traitor&quot; is a fallacy.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Note to the reader: This is a &lt;strong&gt;3 round&lt;/strong&gt; debate designed to be a quick read for voters. Voting on this debate will take very little of your time.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Definition of Terms:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Race:&lt;/strong&gt; 1. any of the traditional divisions of humankind, some being &quot;Asian,&quot; &quot;White,&quot; &quot;African-American,&quot; &quot;Native-American,&quot;&amp;nbsp;&quot;Latino,&quot; etc.&amp;nbsp;characterized by supposedly distinctive and universal physical characteristics:(modified from Dictionary.com)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Traitor&lt;/strong&gt; 1 : one who betrays another's trust or is false to an obligation or duty (Webster's Dictionary)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fallacy&lt;/strong&gt; 1 : a false or mistaken idea &lt;br /&gt;2 : an often plausible argument using false or invalid inference&lt;br /&gt;(Webster's Dictionary)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Organization of Debate&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Round 1&lt;/strong&gt; Acceptance ONLY&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;stro</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Race-Traitor-is-a-Fallacy/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-07-31T19:21:36-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Catholicism is NOT real Christianity</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Catholicism-is-NOT-real-Christianity/2/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Guidelines:

 -This is not an argument over the existence of God, the divinity of Jesus, or the divine inspiration of the Bible, but of the credibility of the Catholic religion
 -Round 1: Opening statement by each person (no arguing/rebuttals in R. 1)
 -Round 2: Rebutting opening statements
 -Round 3: Argument period
 -Round 4: More argument period
 -Round 5: Closing statements. No new arguments in R. 5 are accepted
--------------

I do not believe that Catholicism is real Christianity. My argument will be split in to four points which I will later address: 

1. Catholics pray to dead saints and worship idols.
2. Having a Pope is not Biblical or necessary.
3. Catholics worship Mary.
4. The Catholic Church has pagan and anti-Biblical roots and views.

1) We have all heard Catholics say things like &quot;Saint _____, pray for us&quot;. The Catholics have special prayers for saints, such as &quot;A Parent's Prayer to St. Joseph&quot;, which can be read here: http://w</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Catholicism-is-NOT-real-Christianity/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-08-01T18:48:28-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>God Exists</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/God-Exists/27/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;Resolved: An all-powerful perfect good god exists.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I propose that we debate this resolution. I will be con. The first round will be for acceptance, then we shall begin with opening arguments and rebuttels. I wish you luck if accept. :)&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/God-Exists/27/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-11-06T09:48:13-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>I will contradict myself</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/I-will-contradict-myself/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;Same rules as I will not contradict myself rules.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/I-will-contradict-myself/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-10-11T04:07:22-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The God of the Bible Exists</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-God-of-the-Bible-Exists/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;First round is for opening arguments. The BOP is shared.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;FULL RESOLUTION: It is probable that the Biblical God exists.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;==================&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;OPENING ARGUMENTS&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;==================&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: large;&quot;&gt;Argument from Biblical Defects (ABD)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;(P1)&lt;/strong&gt; If the God of evangelical Christianity were to exist, then the Bible would be God's only written revelation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;(P2)&lt;/strong&gt; Thus, if that deity were to exist, then he would probably see to it that the Bible is perfectly clear and authoritative, and lack the appearance of merely human</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-God-of-the-Bible-Exists/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-09-07T16:40:18-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gay Marriage Should Be Legal In The United States</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Gay-Marriage-Should-Be-Legal-In-The-United-States/5/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'comic sans ms', sans-serif; font-size: small;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'comic sans ms', sans-serif;&quot;&gt;Let's begin by sharing common arguments against same-sex marriages that don't make sense. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong style=&quot;font-family: 'comic sans ms', sans-serif;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;I don't like gays, therefore they should not be able to marry.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'comic sans ms', sans-serif;&quot;&gt;Anyone who says this should not have the right to be involved in such a serious matter. It doesn't matter if you like it or not, it's what is right. There are plenty of people who do want same-sex marriages, therefore why should their wants and needs be ignored?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong style=&quot;font-family: 'comic sans ms', sans-serif;&quot;&gt;&quot;Gays can't have children.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: 'comic sans ms', sans-serif;&quot;&gt;Should an older couple be denied the right to get married just because they can </description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Gay-Marriage-Should-Be-Legal-In-The-United-States/5/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-07-27T13:30:33-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Poseidon is more powerful than Hades.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Poseidon-is-more-powerful-than-Hades./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) This is a simple debate, meant to be interesting/entertaining. By more powerful, I mean that in a one on one match, no sea creatures or undead/harpies/three-headed dogs, Poseidon could defeat Hades.

By more powerful, I do NOT mean that because Hades rules over the underworld and all of it's denizens, he can build up some sort of economic empire using the undead as workers. Nor do I mean that he can pool all the wisdom of the undead, thus amassing more knowledge than Poseidon and therefore being more powerful, at least according to the saying, &quot;Knowledge is power&quot;. This a cage match. Brute power vs brute power.

First round is meant to clear up any questions.

Second and third round- argument/rebuttal.

Feel free to come up with some cheap shot, like Hades using his invisibility cap or stealing Zeus's bolt and using it in the match. This is supposed to be fun!!! Maybe we can posit various scenarios, and the one with most winning scenarios wins?

On a </description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Poseidon-is-more-powerful-than-Hades./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-07-26T09:05:17-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Why apples are better than Oranges</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Why-apples-are-better-than-Oranges/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Why do think that apples are better than oranges</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Why-apples-are-better-than-Oranges/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-05-30T21:05:54-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The non reader</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-non-reader/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) The goal is to refute your opponents points in an argument without reading them</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-non-reader/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-05-23T20:23:19-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Zombies are possible</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Zombies-are-possible/3/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Definitions
Zombies- A reanimated corpse with an appetite for living flesh infected with a virus killing the host and reanimating the corpse.

R1 for acceptance.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Zombies-are-possible/3/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-05-02T16:45:17-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Electric cars should be a priority in plans to fight global warming</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Electric-cars-should-be-a-priority-in-plans-to-fight-global-warming/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) The debate will go in the following order:

Round one: Intro

Round two: main round/ Case

Round three: CX

Round four: conclusion.

My opponent will answer the following questions as well as use these questions as a base for his contentions:
Are electric cars helpful in fighting global warming?
Are electric cars economical?
Are electric cars compatible with electric grids?
Are electric cars reliable?

Thank you.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Electric-cars-should-be-a-priority-in-plans-to-fight-global-warming/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-08-20T12:08:50-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Zombies are possible</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Zombies-are-possible/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) R1 for acceptance.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Zombies-are-possible/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-03-29T21:00:43-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Some cryptids are real</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Some-cryptids-are-real/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;Welcome here is a debate on Cryptids there is proff out there Cryptids are real you will be saying they are not roun 1 acceptance only &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many believe my debates are joke debates most arent this is a serious debate &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;you believe no cryptids are real to accept this &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Cryptid- A creature not yet discovered including &quot;monsters&quot;, ghosts, aliens, ect that have legends to them and alleged sightings that are unconfirmed&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Some-cryptids-are-real/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-09-15T13:04:32-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Should Welfare be removed?</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Should-Welfare-be-removed/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) The argument shall go as follows:

1. Intro (No argument points to be brought up this round)
2. Body/Main Case
3. Cross Examination
4. Conclusion 

I will be arguing as to why welfare should be removed from the political system in the United States.

Experienced debaters need not apply as I am very new to this website.

Thank you</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Should-Welfare-be-removed/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-08-20T12:25:05-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Beatles are best band ever</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Beatles-are-best-band-ever/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;The old debate has been canceled due to my time scudel same debate same round 1 I will bagin debating. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Beatles are still popular&lt;br /&gt;The Beatles have more hits&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Beatles-are-best-band-ever/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-08-02T00:40:19-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gay Marriage Should be Illegal (JOKE DEBATE)</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Gay-Marriage-Should-be-Illegal-JOKE-DEBATE/2/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) No Video, Most lolz wins.

1) Black people have black kids, tall people have tall kids, therefore gay people will have gay kids. Do we really want more gay kids ?

2) God doesn't like gays, we know this cause the bible says so, and we know the bible and our interpretation of the bible is true because...........God just doesn't like gays ok. 

3) Homosexuality is against nature and therefore should be banned, unlike hot dogs, computers and air planes. Things that are for nature include floods, hurricanes and snakes.

4) Jerry Falwell says God hates gay so much, that it helped cause 911 and hurricane Katrina, hey would he lie to you ?

5) Gay marriage doesn't make sense, I mean if you have two men where does the penis go ?

6) Oh I think I just figured 5) out............that ain't right.

7) If gays are allowed to marry, the terrorists win.

8) More gays means more gay actors, and we don't need any more sitcoms like will and grace now do we ?

9</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Gay-Marriage-Should-be-Illegal-JOKE-DEBATE/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-07-27T10:06:05-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yashua is Ha mashiach as spoken of by the prophets</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Yashua-is-Ha-mashiach-as-spoken-of-by-the-prophets/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;Here is a debate on the divinity of Yashua ha mashiach. I will show the Hebrew scriptures proved Yashua to be the Mashiach as told by the prophets of old. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rules &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;New testament is a historacally accurate source&lt;br /&gt;If oral torah is cited Rabbis comments will not be cited but the actual oral torah&lt;br /&gt;Tanakh is will all be equally authorative.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I look forward to this debate.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Yashua-is-Ha-mashiach-as-spoken-of-by-the-prophets/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-10-01T15:38:25-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Southern Europe shoud stop with the Euro</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Southern-Europe-shoud-stop-with-the-Euro/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;As we started it together, I think we should not stop this. I think we should support eachother.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Southern-Europe-shoud-stop-with-the-Euro/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-12-14T20:12:18-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
