<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Debate.org: Contra's Debates</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/?order=1&amp;sort=&amp;member=Contra</link>
<description>Customize this RSS feed by going to http://www.debate.org/rss/</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>2013-05-23T07:58:55-08:00</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2013-05-23T07:58:55-08:00</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Obamacare should be repealed.</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Obamacare-should-be-repealed./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;Obamacare is the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) [1. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act]&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act]&lt;/a&gt;. It is a is a &lt;a title=&quot;United States&quot; href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States&quot;&gt;United States&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a title=&quot;Law of the United States&quot; href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_the_United_States#Federal_law&quot;&gt;federal statute&lt;/a&gt; signed into law by &lt;a title=&quot;President of the United States&quot; href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States&quot;&gt;President&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a title=&quot;Barack Obama&quot; href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama&quot;&gt;Barack Obama&lt;/a&gt; on March 23, 2010. The Act is concerned with health care in the United States. A recent Supreme Court decision upheld the Constitutionality of the legislation. [2. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/blog/168655/obamacare-upheld-how-and-why-did-justice-roberts-do-it#].&quot;&gt;h</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Obamacare-should-be-repealed./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-07-16T23:39:28-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ODT: The Keystone XL Pipeline</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/ODT-The-Keystone-XL-Pipeline/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) This is for the ODT semi-finals. I would like to congratulate Contra for making it this far. 

Full Resolution: The Keystone XL Pipeline should be built in the US. 

Definitions:

Keystone XL Pipeline: &quot;...the 1,897-km (1,179-mile) Keystone XL Pipeline from Hardisty, Alberta to Steele City, Nebraska.&quot;[1]

Should: &quot;Must; ought&quot;[2]

Built: &quot;...past tense of build: To construct (especially something complex) by assembling and joining parts or materials.&quot;[3]

Rules:
 
1. The first round is for acceptance.
2. A forfeit or concession is not allowed.
3. No semantics, trolling, or lawyering.
4. Debate resolution, definitions, rules,and structure cannot be changed without asking in the comments before you post your round 1 argument. Debate resolution, definitions, rules, and structure cannot be changed in the middle of the debate.
 
Voters, in the case of the breaking of any of these rules by either debater, all seven points in voting should be given </description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/ODT-The-Keystone-XL-Pipeline/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-09-08T23:06:58-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The USA should establish a Single-Payer Health Care System</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-USA-should-establish-a-Single-Payer-Health-Care-System/2/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;Round 1 is for acceptance. &amp;nbsp;Good luck.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Single Payer Health Care:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;Single-payer national health insurance is a system in which a single public or quasi-public agency organizes health financing, but delivery of care remains largely private. Under a single-payer system, all Americans would be covered for all medically necessary services, including: doctor, hospital, preventive, long-term care, mental health, reproductive health care, dental, vision, prescription drug and medical supply costs. Patients would regain free choice of doctor and hospital, and doctors would regain autonomy over patient care.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Socialized Medicine: &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;Socialized medicine is a system in which doctors and hospitals work for and draw salaries from the government.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pnhp.org/facts/single-payer-faq#socialized&quot;&gt;http://www.pnhp.org/facts/single-payer-faq#socialized&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-USA-should-establish-a-Single-Payer-Health-Care-System/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-02-07T02:40:14-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Improved Medicare for All (USA)</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Improved-Medicare-for-All-USA/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;R1: &amp;nbsp;Acceptance and Definitions&lt;br /&gt;R2: &amp;nbsp;Arguments&lt;br /&gt;R3: &amp;nbsp;Arguments/ Rebuttals&lt;br /&gt;R4: &amp;nbsp;Rebuttals and Closing&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*No trolling, spamming, bad conduct (new arguments last round, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*To counter net contender advantage, Con shall only be allowed to respond with 7,000 characters in R4.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*Each side must present one witty quote per round regarding the debate topic (starting R2).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Improved Medicare for All:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A health care system in which one payer (the government) funds all medically necessary procedures with a single insurance pool. &amp;nbsp;Financed through a combination of payroll taxes and income taxes, or other methods. &amp;nbsp;Equal access to coverage and patients have free choice of doctor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And with that, I await Con's acceptance.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Improved-Medicare-for-All-USA/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-08-12T22:18:11-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MIG Tourney R5: &quot;Dexter, overall is a better show than Breaking Bad.&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/MIG-Tourney-R5-Dexter-overall-is-a-better-show-than-Breaking-Bad./1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;This is the Semi-Final round for MIG's Tourney!! First off I would like to congratulate my opponent for making it this far in the tourney, and wish him an immense amount of luck for the coming debate!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To start, I think it's best we lay down some framework and rules for this debate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;****FRAMEWORK****&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. This is a tournament debate, so it goes without saying that both debaters will be polite and cordial in the coming clash of words, to the best of their own abilities!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. This debate is based on the concepts and ideas shared by two televisions shows. Both debaters will prove why they think their show specifically is better than their opponents shows. We will be using reasons on concepts, and Ideas, to prove why one show is more interesting than the other, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. This is a tournament debate, so if either party drops or misses a round, it should be counted as a loss of the debate. Coming t</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/MIG-Tourney-R5-Dexter-overall-is-a-better-show-than-Breaking-Bad./1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-09-03T23:00:50-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Progressive Income Tax</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Progressive-Income-Tax/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;This debate is on the progressive tax on individual citizens. &amp;nbsp;I am Pro. &amp;nbsp;The rich should pay more of their share of income than the middle class and poor. &amp;nbsp;You can make moral, economic, or other arguments. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this debate, I will focus on Pro - Progressive Income Tax that is fair and has no loopholes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Plus, do not introduce any new arguments in the third round. &amp;nbsp;First round is acceptance.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In my plan, the system would look like this:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Income Tax&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; .................... &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Applied To&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt; Rate&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;10%-------------------------Up to $15,000&lt;br /&gt;20%-------------------------Up to $70,000&lt;br /&gt;25%-------------------------Up to $250,000&lt;br /&gt;35%-----------------------</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Progressive-Income-Tax/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-02-16T22:43:36-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Everything a Person Does Is Influenced By Society</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Everything-a-Person-Does-Is-Influenced-By-Society/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Society&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;: &amp;nbsp;A&lt;span&gt;n enduring and cooperating&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a class=&quot;formulaic&quot; href=&quot;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/social&quot;&gt;social&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;group whose members have developed organized patterns of relationships through interaction with one another&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Person&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;: &amp;nbsp;An individual human being &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Influenced&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;: &amp;nbsp; To have an effect on the condition or development of&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is a LD debate. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Everything-a-Person-Does-Is-Influenced-By-Society/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-03-10T01:21:29-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Resolved: Obama's performance in the White House has not been successful</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-Obamas-performance-in-the-White-House-has-not-been-successful/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;I thank my opponent for agreeing to debate this topic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Resolved: Obama's performance in the White House has not been successful&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This debate will focus on three main topics:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;1.&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;Jobs&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;2. &lt;/span&gt;Energy&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;3.&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;Foreign Policy&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Layout&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Round 1: Acceptance&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Round 2: Main Arguments&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Round 3: Rebuttals (Rights are reserved to add in more arguments)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Round 4: Rebuttal/Conclusion. To balance out the last word advantage, PRO gets to rebut two points while CON gets to rebut one point.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;No semantic arguments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;May the Odds be Ever in Your Favor!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-Obamas-performance-in-the-White-House-has-not-been-successful/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-04-12T22:01:26-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Rich Should Take a Hike</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Rich-Should-Take-a-Hike/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;The resolution is that the wealthy should take a hike in taxes. &amp;nbsp;I will be advocating for an expiration of the Bush tax cuts on the wealthy, or additional taxation of the wealthy on top of that. &amp;nbsp;I support ending nearly all the tax loopholes and deductions, but that will not likely be a large point in this debate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No semantics or trolling.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;R1: &amp;nbsp;Acceptance and Definitions&lt;br /&gt;R2: &amp;nbsp;Arguments/ Rebuttals&lt;br /&gt;R3: &amp;nbsp;Arguments/ Rebuttals&lt;br /&gt;R4: &amp;nbsp;Rebuttals and Closing*&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since of the net contender advantage of last word, PRO will be able to rebut only 2 points in the last round. &amp;nbsp;CON will be able to only rebut 1 point in the last round.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Good luck!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Rich-Should-Take-a-Hike/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-05-30T22:52:44-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Personal Retirement Accounts should replace Entitlements</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Personal-Retirement-Accounts-should-replace-Entitlements/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;R1: &amp;nbsp;Acceptance and Definitions&lt;br /&gt;R2: &amp;nbsp;Arguments and Rebuttals&lt;br /&gt;R3: &amp;nbsp;Rebuttals and Closing&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Personal Retirement Accounts&lt;/span&gt;: &amp;nbsp;Basically indivividual or jointly owned (say by married couples) accounts in which the owners save money to invest in various securities as they wish.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Entitlements&lt;/span&gt;: &amp;nbsp;The social welfare programs ran by the federal government including Medicare, and Social Security. &amp;nbsp;Mostly financed by payroll taxes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*No new arguments last round&lt;br /&gt;*No semantics&lt;br /&gt;*Forfeit = automatic loss&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Good luck!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Personal-Retirement-Accounts-should-replace-Entitlements/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-11-23T07:53:18-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mitt Romney isn't telling the Truth (as a GOP candidate)</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mitt-Romney-isnt-telling-the-Truth-as-a-GOP-candidate/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span id=&quot;hotword&quot;&gt;&lt;span id=&quot;hotword&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mitt Romney&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;: &amp;nbsp;The guy who is the son of former Michigan Governor George Romney. &amp;nbsp;This dude&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/imgres?q=Mitt+Romney&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;biw=1440&amp;amp;bih=799&amp;amp;gbv=2&amp;amp;tbm=isch&amp;amp;tbnid=tCWkcCCUevZLNM:&amp;amp;imgrefurl=http://www.historyguy.com/politics/mitt_romney_political_biography.htm&amp;amp;docid=MOyBA0E9sHFBoM&amp;amp;imgurl=http://www.historyguy.com/politics/mitt-romney.jpg&amp;amp;w=413&amp;amp;h=310&amp;amp;ei=n1OCT_KKB6L00gHGy5TwBw&amp;amp;zoom=1&amp;amp;iact=hc&amp;amp;vpx=188&amp;amp;vpy=188&amp;amp;dur=1282&amp;amp;hovh=194&amp;amp;hovw=259&amp;amp;tx=222&amp;amp;ty=88&amp;amp;sig=110620478381020958068&amp;amp;page=1&amp;amp;tbnh=139&amp;amp;tbnw=195&amp;amp;start=0&amp;amp;ndsp=32&amp;amp;ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:135&quot;&gt;http://www.google.com/imgres?q=Mitt+Romney&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;biw=1440&amp;amp;bih=799&amp;amp;gbv=2&amp;amp;tbm=isch&amp;amp;tbnid=tCWkcCCUevZLNM:&amp;amp;imgrefurl=http://www.historyguy.com/politics/mitt_r</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Mitt-Romney-isnt-telling-the-Truth-as-a-GOP-candidate/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-04-16T23:16:18-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>should child labor be allowed</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/should-child-labor-be-allowed/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) the rules of the game
1: Explain why you agree child labor should be allowed
2: Post websites/ your information source
3: Debate well and I wish you luck


I am strongly against child labor. so is most of the US Federal Gov't hence why they made child labor laws. these child labor laws states that Teens hired for nonagricultural employment (which is just about everything other than farm work) must be at least fourteen. Other child labor law restrictions, regulating the type of positions young workers can hold and the type of work they can do are also in effect. 

18 Years of Age
Once a youth reaches 18 years of age, he or she is no longer subject to the federal youth employment and child labor law provisions.

16 and 17 Years of Age
Sixteen- and 17-year-olds may be employed for unlimited hours in any occupation other than those declared hazardous by the Secretary of Labor. Examples of equipment declared hazardous in food service establishments inclu</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/should-child-labor-be-allowed/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-10-24T15:09:49-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Everything a Person Does is Influenced By Society</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Everything-a-Person-Does-is-Influenced-By-Society/2/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Society&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;: A&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;n enduring and cooperating&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;social&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;group whose members have developed organized patterns of relationships through interaction with one another&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Person&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;: An individual human being&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Influenced&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;: To have an effect on the condition or development of&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No trolling, no semantics&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;R1:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;nbsp;Acceptance&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;R2:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;nbsp;Arguments and Rebuttals&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;R3:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;nbsp;Rebuttals and Closing&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Good luck. &amp;nbsp;To counter last word argument, in R3 CON can only use 5</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Everything-a-Person-Does-is-Influenced-By-Society/2/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-06-01T21:00:27-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Resolved: Barack Obama is not a Socialist</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-Barack-Obama-is-not-a-Socialist/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) I am arguing that Barack Obama is not a Socialist. Round 1 will be intro, and Round 2 will be the main argument.

Definition of Socialism:
 Any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods

Definition of Socialist:
 A person who advocates or practices Socialism.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-Barack-Obama-is-not-a-Socialist/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-11-29T21:57:23-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MIG'S TOURNY: Contradiction Debate</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/MIGS-TOURNY-Contradiction-Debate/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;This is for round 4 of Man-is-good's tournament. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The rules:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1) In Rounds 1-3, CON will ask PRO 10 Yes/No questions.&lt;br /&gt;2) In Rounds 2-4, PRO will answer all of CON's questions with Yes, No, or an explanation as to why neither answer would be completely correct.&lt;br /&gt;3) In Rounds 2-4, CON can point out any contradictions that he or she believes to be present in PRO's answers, citing all questions and answers involved in the contradiction. No new contradictions may be pointed out in Round 5.&lt;br /&gt;4) When CON points out a contradiction, PRO may use all of the following rounds to defend the accused contradiction until either CON drops the accusation or PRO admits defeat, or when the debate is over.&lt;br /&gt;5) If PRO is never found to have contradicted himself in this debate, PRO wins.&lt;br /&gt;6) If PRO is ever found to have contradicted himself in this debate, PRO loses.&lt;br /&gt;7) It is still important that debaters back up th</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/MIGS-TOURNY-Contradiction-Debate/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-08-02T15:05:52-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Full 50-State Green Retrofit Initiative</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Full-50-State-Green-Retrofit-Initiative/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;R1: &amp;nbsp;Acceptance and Definition(s)&lt;br /&gt;R2-R3: &amp;nbsp;Arguments and Rebuttals&lt;br /&gt;R4: &amp;nbsp;Rebuttals and Closing&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*No semantics or trolling&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;----Background----&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;50-state Green Energy Retrofit Iniative;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;is basically a public/private partnership by some aspects. &amp;nbsp;To put it on a more basic level, a retrofit is when a utility company comes to the customer's property and basically makes it more updated, modern, and efficient by installing more green, clean energy systems to the building in areas such as water, insulation, HVAC, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, to finance this retrofit, which has somewhat large upfront costs but longterm savings, the customer would continue to pay the original energy bill (the rate before the retrofit) or slighty more over time so eventually the cost of the retrofit plus interest comes as a net profit to the utility and the bank. &amp;nbsp;We will assume that utility rates are d</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Full-50-State-Green-Retrofit-Initiative/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-07-31T10:49:14-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Should we cut Welfare</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Should-we-cut-Welfare/1/</link>
<description>(Voting Period) I think that welfare should be cut and looked at for two reasons. 

1. People are abusing the system and using it to get free money and in other words we are giving money to somone who has no problem.

2. One of the issues is that welfare was a good idea when it was first made, but now it can look bad because more money is be put into the system from other Americans.</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Should-we-cut-Welfare/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2011-08-30T13:13:56-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Doctors Should Learn About Sleep Disorders</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Doctors-Should-Learn-About-Sleep-Disorders/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;No semantics or trolling.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;R1: &amp;nbsp;Acceptance and argument&lt;br /&gt;R2: &amp;nbsp;Debate arguments and rebuttal&lt;br /&gt;R3: &amp;nbsp;Closing&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*To counter last word advantage, in the last round CON will only be able to use 5,000 characters.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Doctors-Should-Learn-About-Sleep-Disorders/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-05-30T09:59:29-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Resolved: The US should constitute a Single-Payer Health Care System</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-The-US-should-constitute-a-Single-Payer-Health-Care-System/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) Single payer HC definition:

&quot;Single-payer health care is medical care funded from a single insurance pool, run by the state.&quot;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-payer_health_care

Rules:
1st round acceptance
no semantics with the title
8000 characters</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Resolved-The-US-should-constitute-a-Single-Payer-Health-Care-System/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-03-11T21:05:51-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Use of Money is a form of Free Speech, therefore no Campaign Finance Reform</title>
<link>http://www.debate.org/debates/Use-of-Money-is-a-form-of-Free-Speech-therefore-no-Campaign-Finance-Reform/1/</link>
<description>(Post Voting Period) &lt;div&gt;I am Pro for Campaign Finance Reform. &amp;nbsp;Plus, use of money is not a form of free speech. &amp;nbsp;Round 1 is acceptance, Round 2 main arguments, and Round 3 rebuttals and closing.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.debate.org/debates/Use-of-Money-is-a-form-of-Free-Speech-therefore-no-Campaign-Finance-Reform/1/comments/</comments>
<pubDate>2012-02-01T11:59:03-08:00</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
